sharetrader

View Poll Results: Should the 2018 Picks Comp allow for the impact of rights issues?

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    14 51.85%
  • No

    13 48.15%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    CEO, NZ Shareholders Association
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    594

    Default Poll - 2018 Stock Picks - Include Rights?

    This poll is what it says on the tin...do we include the impact of rights issues in the 2018 stock picks?
    (ie, increase in investment, time-weighted %age)

  2. #2
    Guru
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    3,247

    Default

    Bumped.....

  3. #3
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,862

    Unhappy There are rights issues and then there are rights issues

    There are currently two 'rights issues' in progress on the NZX and they are very different:

    HBL where the right can not be traded (use it or lose it);

    TWR where the right can be sold on market.


    So for the 2017 contest:

    the HBL instance I intend to ignore (where does the money come from to buy extra shares?);

    the TWR rights will be 'sold' at the closing price on the last day of trading and either new shares purchased on market with the proceeds or the cash amount treated like a dividend.

    You can always rely on me to complicate the issue .
    om mani peme hum

  4. #4
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,907

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paper Tiger View Post
    There are currently two 'rights issues' in progress on the NZX and they are very different:

    HBL where the right can not be traded (use it or lose it);

    TWR where the right can be sold on market.


    So for the 2017 contest:

    the HBL instance I intend to ignore (where does the money come from to buy extra shares?);

    the TWR rights will be 'sold' at the closing price on the last day of trading and either new shares purchased on market with the proceeds or the cash amount treated like a dividend.

    You can always rely on me to complicate the issue .
    And often when you 'lose it' you get a little bonus cheque if they sell the shortfall for more
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  5. #5
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,862

    Arrow elapsed turn around time 0.0003 seconds

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    And often when you 'lose it' you get a little bonus cheque if they sell the shortfall for more
    Forgot HBL doing that, (I applied for all mine) I will include that when we know what it is then.
    om mani peme hum

  6. #6
    CEO, NZ Shareholders Association
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    594

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paper Tiger View Post
    There are currently two 'rights issues' in progress on the NZX and they are very different:

    HBL where the right can not be traded (use it or lose it);

    TWR where the right can be sold on market.


    So for the 2017 contest:

    the HBL instance I intend to ignore (where does the money come from to buy extra shares?);

    the TWR rights will be 'sold' at the closing price on the last day of trading and either new shares purchased on market with the proceeds or the cash amount treated like a dividend.

    You can always rely on me to complicate the issue .
    That's exactly why (if we do it) I thought its fair to assume you take them up in the comp - HBL's were not traded, so can't ascribe a value.
    So...

    base investment at January 1st = $10,000 comprising $10,000 shares.
    rights issue on June 30th 2018 for 2 for every 10, at a price of $1.10 each.
    => new base investment = $10,000 + $2,200 = $12,200 comprising 12,000 shares
    at end of year, shares are $1.20 - or $14,400

    $ return = $14,400 - $10,000 - $2,200 = $2,200
    %age return:
    - base: $2,000 / $10,000 = 20%
    - rights: $200 / $2,200 = 9.1% x 2 for half a year = 18.2%
    total return %age = 10,000/12,000 * 20% PLUS 2000/12000 X 18.2 %
    = 19.7%

    The power of spreadsheets make this all very easy...

  7. #7
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,862

    Exclamation Seems to be better to have not taken up the issue

    Quote Originally Posted by SylvesterCat View Post
    That's exactly why (if we do it) I thought its fair to assume you take them up in the comp - HBL's were not traded, so can't ascribe a value.
    So...

    base investment at January 1st = $10,000 comprising $10,000 shares.
    rights issue on June 30th 2018 for 2 for every 10, at a price of $1.10 each.
    => new base investment = $10,000 + $2,200 = $12,200 comprising 12,000 shares
    at end of year, shares are $1.20 - or $14,400

    $ return = $14,400 - $10,000 - $2,200 = $2,200
    %age return:
    - base: $2,000 / $10,000 = 20%
    - rights: $200 / $2,200 = 9.1% x 2 for half a year = 18.2%
    total return %age = 10,000/12,000 * 20% PLUS 2000/12000 X 18.2 %
    = 19.7%

    The power of spreadsheets make this all very easy...
    I see that you can complicate it even better than I can.

    If you are going to buy an 2,000 new shares @ $1.10 ($2,200) then you need to sell sufficient existing shares to provide that $2,200.
    So if the market price at that time is (for example) $1.15 you sell 1,913 shares to buy 2,000 shares and you gain is 87 shares.

    End of year = 10,087 shares at $1.2 = $12,104.35 or 21.0435%

    [Then remember to handle the interim dividend on 10,000 shares before 30-jun and the final dividend on 10,087 after 30-jun)
    om mani peme hum

  8. #8
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,907

    Default

    Snoopy had a good suggestion as to how to handle rights

    Can't quite recall what it was but it was good
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  9. #9
    Membaa
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Paradise
    Posts
    5,350

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Snoopy had a good suggestion as to how to handle rights

    Can't quite recall what it was but it was good
    For the sake of a competition, can one assume 'rights' are taken up by all shareholders and therefore accrue to the value of the (their) SP performance, if not or maybe the head share (?) which is the measure of performance. What happens to those who do not take up their 'rights', should they be penalised, or is 'rights' treated as a blanket gain on a SP? Confusing, which is probably why it has been left out of previous PS comps.

    I don't think discretionary gains through rights should be incorporated into SP performance.

  10. #10
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,301

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Snoopy had a good suggestion as to how to handle rights

    Can't quite recall what it was but it was good
    The discussion may be found here.

    https://www.sharetrader.co.nz/showth...-Contest/page2

    To put this in the context of Sylvestor's theoretical Heartland cash issue of June 2018

    $10,000 worth of base shares at $1 per share means each share is worth $1 at the start of the year (I prefer to think on a 'per share' basis).

    On 30th June 2018, new shares were offered at $1.10, in a ratio of '2 for every 10' (one share for every 5 held). Put another way, this means that for every 1 share held, each shareholder was entitled to 0.2 of a new share at a price of $1.10.

    Translating this into algebra for any time after the cash issue, leads to the following equation for determining the equivalent rights issue value adjusted price from any future subsequent market price 'P' on any future date.

    P + 0.2(P-1.10)
    =1.2P-0.22

    Note that in the equation above, the $1.10 rights issue price is subtracted out of the equation. Thus the end result only reflects the market premium to the cash issue price that applies on competition close date. The $1.10 that the investor put in to buy each new share is not counted.

    As an example, with an end of year 2018 market closing price of $1.20, this equates to a 'rights issue adjusted closing price' of:

    1.2($1.20) - 0.22 = $1.22 (*)

    All of the above assumes that the new shares are retained by the investor. If the new shares are sold by the investor then you could treat that sale price above the cash outlaid as an 'extra dividend' as some others have suggested. But then of course you have the extra complication of determining what the sale price is....

    SNOOPY

    (*) This is slightly different to Sylvestor's answer of 19.7%. Sylvestor has taken into consideration the 'time value of money' and doubled the annual percentage return on the rights shares because they were held over only six months, which I haven't done. But he has also included the full return on the new capital required to take up the new shares. That's not 'wrong'. But I don't think it is within the spirit of the rules to introduce new capital into the competition for only those competitors who happen to pick a share with a rights issue that comes up later. I prefer my approach where the new capital is subtracted out. That means my calculated return is from the 1st January shareholder capital only, which is I think the fairer approach.
    Last edited by Snoopy; 07-12-2017 at 04:47 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •