OCA or MPG Mk11

[Maverick]

Can’t see MPG being 45 cents in 2 years

ok, need a maths teacher guy to clarify this, being a competition and all we need to understand the rules.(plus being a maths based website , its good to be speaking the same language elsewhere too).
im thinking 3 times more means $1.80 is 3 times more than $.60.
i think W69 (sorry if I'm getting this wrong Matey) is suggesting $1.80 is 3 times more than $.45.
Now, to me winners take is not 3x more , rather he is thinking 300 % more....
According to my wife , I am actually not always right.
Beagle, you started this, what say you?

[Ggcc]

ok, need a maths teacher guy to clarify this, being a competition and all we need to understand the rules.(plus being a maths based website , its good to be speaking the same language elsewhere too).
im thinking 3 times more means $1.80 is 3 times more than $.60.
i think W69 (sorry if I'm getting this wrong Matey) is suggesting $1.80 is 3 times more than $.45.
Now, to me winners take is not 3x more , rather he is thinking 300 % more....
According to my wife , I am actually not always right.
Beagle, you started this, what say you?

I think what winner is indicating is that OCA will be worth roughly $1.35 in two years nothing more........

[Beagle]

ok, need a maths teacher guy to clarify this, being a competition and all we need to understand the rules.(plus being a maths based website , its good to be speaking the same language elsewhere too).
im thinking 3 times more means $1.80 is 3 times more than $.60.
i think W69 (sorry if I'm getting this wrong Matey) is suggesting $1.80 is 3 times more than $.45.
Now, to me winners take is not 3x more , rather he is thinking 300 % more....
According to my wife , I am actually not always right.
Beagle, you started this, what say you?

According to my wife she is always right so I checked with (she it is better not to argue with).
3 times MPG share price or more means exactly that. For example, if MPG is 60 cents in 2 years time, will OCA be more or less than $1.80 ?

[Filthy]

as hilarious as this thread is, we should really be pitting OCA vs its industry peers (i.e. SUM or RYM) and MPG vs the likes of FBU or STU.
at least make it comparable & a fair fight. in my mind, putting a high-growth stock up against ('what should be') a reasonable divi paying stock (in a currently beaten down segment) is not that useful. other interesting match-ups could be POT vs AIA, SML vs ATM, SEK vs SCL, etc
would be great to get some punters thoughts on what might outperform when it is actually an equal footing.

[Beagle]

This thread is just meant to be a bit of fun and my way to help people think about the effect of strong headwinds v strong tailwinds.

[minimoke]

I have given MPG some very serious consideration which consumed all of 5 seconds of my time. The result being I've bought more OCA today at $1.15

[Beagle]

I have given MPG some very serious consideration which consumed all of 5 seconds of my time. The result being I've bought more OCA today at $1.15

LOL We should probably have another fun poll. Which sector mutt has more fleas, FBU, MPG or STU...in fact I might do just that.