sharetrader
Page 71 of 115 FirstFirst ... 216167686970717273747581 ... LastLast
Results 701 to 710 of 1147

Thread: Power shares

  1. #701
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Chrischurch
    Posts
    40

    Default

    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political...ration-by-2030

    Labour wants 100% Renewable Energy Generation by 2030..

  2. #702
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gains View Post
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political...ration-by-2030

    Labour wants 100% Renewable Energy Generation by 2030..
    Electioneering fantasy land stuff in my opinion.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  3. #703
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    NEW ZEALAND
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Electioneering fantasy land stuff in my opinion.
    How are they coming along with the 100,000 houses. Roughly 30 a day I reckon.

  4. #704
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gains View Post
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political...ration-by-2030

    Labour wants 100% Renewable Energy Generation by 2030..
    Well if they really do that, we will be having blackouts at regular intervals when the lakes are low...

  5. #705
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,438

    Default

    They also promised to electrify the Government fleet of 15,000 cars. Have delivered 108 in 3 years or 0.7% of the fleet. So yes like Beagle said, "electioneering fantasy land stuff"

  6. #706
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,887

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by iceman View Post
    They also promised to electrify the Government fleet of 15,000 cars. Have delivered 108 in 3 years or 0.7% of the fleet. So yes like Beagle said, "electioneering fantasy land stuff"
    You are right, and it looks like the uptake of EV's is on the decline big time. Less EV's registered last month than 2 years ago.

    https://www.transport.govt.nz/mot-re...registrations/

  7. #707
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gains View Post
    https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/political...ration-by-2030

    Labour wants 100% Renewable Energy Generation by 2030..
    Be bad for Genesis's div yield that wouldn't it?

  8. #708
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Electioneering fantasy land stuff in my opinion.
    Quote Originally Posted by blackcap View Post
    Well if they really do that, we will be having blackouts at regular intervals when the lakes are low...
    This is one policy that is achievable. It would not be cheap, but certainly possible. The lake Onslow Pumped Storage scheme is what would ensure the lights stay on during a dry year. If taken to its maximum potential it would treble NZ's available storage at a cost of $4B.

    The point to remember is that Onslow would not produce any new energy, but would store energy at times of excess and release it again at times of shortage. The additional new energy would need to come from wind farms, like the 860 MW Castle Hill one.

  9. #709
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Chrischurch
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jantar View Post
    This is one policy that is achievable. It would not be cheap, but certainly possible. The lake Onslow Pumped Storage scheme is what would ensure the lights stay on during a dry year. If taken to its maximum potential it would treble NZ's available storage at a cost of $4B.

    The point to remember is that Onslow would not produce any new energy, but would store energy at times of excess and release it again at times of shortage. The additional new energy would need to come from wind farms, like the 860 MW Castle Hill one.
    My thoughts exactly, starts to make sense why government started talking about Lake Onslow a month or so ago.

    Castle Hill would be a must, but Onslow is the why such a project would get enough security to make it feasible.

  10. #710
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaa View Post
    Be bad for Genesis's div yield that wouldn't it?
    Probably not.
    By 2030 all the Rankine units will be retired and unit 5 will be nearing the end of its economic life.

    Replacing those will be the Castle Hill wind farm, but that only becomes fully economic if there is a method of storing that wind energy at times of high generation. This is where the Onslow scheme helps. It can store energy, and at the same time apply a floor to the price that wind farms get for their generation. This would be doubly effective if Genesis was to own and/or operate the Onslow scheme.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •