sharetrader
Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 289101112
Results 166 to 172 of 172
  1. #166
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2018
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    261

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiora View Post
    Doesn't seem like much CGT for all those audits
    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/118...3+January+2020
    Which goes to show that the tax laws in NZ are not on a fair playing field. As a matter of comparison, in Canada when you purchase property you have to disclose to the lawyer / conveyance person why you're buying it? there's a tick box list of things like 'your 1st home', 'vacation home', non-resident home, and many others. NZ's taxing of property speculators is no different than in Canada. Actually there are 3 major categories that the tax authority views on house / land purchase. If you're in the business of dealing with buying and selling real estate, then of course the gains on the sale of your assets (the houses) will be taxed at same business income rates (no different to in NZ). If you bought the house as an individual and it turns out you're in the building trade, then the gains would be classed as regular individual income tax rates. If you bought the house and made improvements to the house in a renovation, then the 'adjusted cost base' would have to be changed and the house would get revalued for taxation and of course, the intent is the key ; auditors will ask did you renovate with intention to sell? If so, then the gains on the sale will be at capital gains rates. So what i'm getting at is what IRD has done is they have not spelled out clearly (as in that article) what is taxable when making gains on the sale of property. Too many loops holes in my opinion because something like this would never happen in Canada ; they don't even have such a brightline test criteria - the declaration status is determined at the time of purchase and at time when the house is sold.

    @ Bjauck:

    What I was getting at is at school, the smart students that do so well (and of course work hard) are well rewarded and those that fall behind... they just get left in the corner. But in the realm of investments in NZ, it's only those that have the $ are the ones that can take advantage of buying NZ residential properties and be able to sell near retirement with tax free capital gains. Those that are on the low end class status in NZ have only... Kiwi Saver for which is subjected to a lot more taxes throughout the entire investing scheme. That's unfair and that's why Canada addressed this issue decades ago. The rich shouldn't be the only ones that can make $ and 'be advantaged'. Just like at uni, the smart or clever students are the only ones that can get scholarships. It's all wrong.

  2. #167
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    SBQ - I agree with you on the Kiwisaver/investment real estate unfairness in burden of tax.
    Last edited by Bjauck; 23-01-2020 at 07:41 PM.

  3. #168
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    10,867

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron View Post
    $12.5mill taxes or $37.8mill in profits (assuming the top tax rate) possibly closer to $50mill. assuming an average of 25% tax rate for one year.

    Better than a kick in the pants.
    Then there are those who ‘voluntarily’ agree to pay tax on their property gains after becoming aware of that audits.

  4. #169
    Permanent Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,007

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Then there are those who ‘voluntarily’ agree to pay tax on their property gains after becoming aware of that audits.
    True, because the extension of the bright line test to 5 years was a recent adjustment, I had heard the IRD contacted people to tell them they may have missed something from their tax returns and if you don't want late payment and shortfall penalties maybe you want to revisit your calculations before we audit. The bright line test is pretty cut and dried in many cases so it would be interesting to know how much was voluntarily disclosed after contact from IRD prior to being audited.

  5. #170
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    UN housing expert calls for NZ rent freeze and CGT to end 'significant human rights crisis'

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/h...-rights-crisis

    Does the UN expert realise the electoral hurdle that exists to overcome the entitlement of boomer investors in residential housing?

  6. #171
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,642

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bjauck View Post
    UN housing expert calls for NZ rent freeze and CGT to end 'significant human rights crisis'

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/h...-rights-crisis

    Does the UN expert realise the electoral hurdle that exists to overcome the entitlement of boomer investors in residential housing?
    She certainly hasn't studied the effect of rent-freezes, which has always proved disastrous; even NZ's last rent freeze under Muldoon.

  7. #172
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,931

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fungus pudding View Post
    She certainly hasn't studied the effect of rent-freezes, which has always proved disastrous; even NZ's last rent freeze under Muldoon.
    Muldoon was a divisive figure?

    Maybe she thought that given the current circumstances in NZ, a rent freeze although imperfect was better than letting the current situation to continue.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •