-
Originally Posted by SBQ
Pension funds like KiwiSaver already have the ability to produce higher returns through leverage (on margin). But using KiwiSaver to invest into a new business or towards school study is entirely a different can of beans. The fact that more than 95% of small businesses fail within 5 years is a good reason why banks shy away from lending for business ventures. Likewise with schooling. If the person takes on a useless degree than where would that leave in terms of wise use of KiwiSaver funds (when it could be kept in the pension to have more growth?).
Sure the KiwiSaver money released for further education may result in failure for the kiwsaver concerned. The money released for real estate purchase may result in further inflating th housing market or it may be used to buy an over priced problem house. My opinion is that Kiwisaver should only be used for retirement and not as a real estate deposit saving scheme.
The government should introduce a second tax concessionary scheme to encourage saving with the ability to withdraw savings (with a write-back of tax concessions for withdrawals over a certain amount and within a set time period) prior to retirement.
Last edited by Bjauck; 14-12-2019 at 09:33 AM.
-
Originally Posted by artemis
Iceman's issue was to do with serviceability rather than security. Banks can have whatever rules they like, but I would have thought a dividend stream was at least as reliable as a household's employment income.
My point exactly artemis. They accept employment income and rental income but ignore 100% of the dividend income. I showed them back 7 years that the dividend income was certainly no less reliable than rental income but "rules are rules". That is the ridiculous part. Then we are told to diversify our savings and investments but the whole system is geared towards housing artificially maintaining worryingly high prices. And our young first home buyers and families are the biggest sufferers of this stupid policy.
-
Originally Posted by iceman
My point exactly artemis. They accept employment income and rental income but ignore 100% of the dividend income. I showed them back 7 years that the dividend income was certainly no less reliable than rental income but "rules are rules". That is the ridiculous part. Then we are told to diversify our savings and investments but the whole system is geared towards housing artificially maintaining worryingly high prices. And our young first home buyers and families are the biggest sufferers of this stupid policy.
Yes, employment income can fluctuate - and disappear - just as dividend income can. But if the worst happens the value of the equities usually disappears but the mortgage on the real estate remains.
-
Originally Posted by macduffy
Yes, employment income can fluctuate - and disappear - just as dividend income can. But if the worst happens the value of the equities usually disappears but the mortgage on the real estate remains.
Too true. Banks mitigate some risk by using a higher than actual interest rate to calculate serviceability.
However employment income takes a big hit when the household of two with two incomes becomes a household of three with one income. Certainly very common with first home buyers. They usually make it through the tough years, often with free government money, and into calmer waters.
-
Originally Posted by Bjauck
Sure the KiwiSaver money released for further education may result in failure for the kiwsaver concerned. The money released for real estate purchase may result in further inflating th housing market or it may be used to buy an over priced problem house. My opinion is that Kiwisaver should only be used for retirement and not as a real estate deposit saving scheme.
The government should introduce a second tax concessionary scheme to encourage saving with the ability to withdraw savings (with a write-back of tax concessions for withdrawals over a certain amount and within a set time period) prior to retirement.
If you really want to curb the rising real estate prices.. just tax it. Don't allow those owning more than 1 house to sell (after holding for more than 5 years) where the gains are tax free. Those that have made gains in Kiwi Saver would be a fool not to use those funds to put into their 1st home. (ie transferring from 1 asset pool that is taxable vs the house asset that has tax free capital gain). This reminds me again, i've asked local financial advisors if they worked out the difference between owning a Kiwi Saver fund vs owning a house (where they can leverage). They always come back saying "that depends".
-
Originally Posted by SBQ
If you really want to curb the rising real estate prices.. just tax it. Don't allow those owning more than 1 house to sell (after holding for more than 5 years) where the gains are tax free. Those that have made gains in Kiwi Saver would be a fool not to use those funds to put into their 1st home. (ie transferring from 1 asset pool that is taxable vs the house asset that has tax free capital gain). This reminds me again, i've asked local financial advisors if they worked out the difference between owning a Kiwi Saver fund vs owning a house (where they can leverage). They always come back saying "that depends".
Why the one house limit? Either tax capital gains - or don't.
-
Originally Posted by macduffy
Yes, employment income can fluctuate - and disappear - just as dividend income can. But if the worst happens the value of the equities usually disappears but the mortgage on the real estate remains.
In the unlikely and very extreme event of a diversified share portfolio "disappearing", IŽd say our housing market would be in serious trouble also. Best for the banks not to lend anything, just in case the sky falls in !!!
-
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
Why the one house limit? Either tax capital gains - or don't.
'Special' treatment for rental owners is having an effect.
Last few headlines from Trademe's monthly rental price report -
Rental prices continue their surge toward summer
Rents in the main centres warm up with summer on the horizon
Demand soars for rentals across the country
Tenants in Wellington paying $60 more per week in rent
Rents rise countrywide
Rents rocket in the region
-
Originally Posted by artemis
'Special' treatment for rental owners is having an effect.
Last few headlines from Trademe's monthly rental price report -
Rental prices continue their surge toward summer
Rents in the main centres warm up with summer on the horizon
Demand soars for rentals across the country
Tenants in Wellington paying $60 more per week in rent
Rents rise countrywide
Rents rocket in the region
What is 'special' treatment?
-
15-12-2019, 11:30 AM
#100
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
What is 'special' treatment?
Bright line test, ring fencing of rental losses, removal of building depreciation for starters. None of those apply to other businesses, including commercial property.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks