-
25-07-2020, 10:39 AM
#101
Member
The NZX will have to go to the back room and find the wet bus tickets left over from the Watson days
-
25-07-2020, 10:41 AM
#102
Originally Posted by MarineSalvage
The NZX will have to go to the back room and find the wet bus tickets left over from the Watson days
Nothing will happen with the directors and managers because if anything is found to be in breach of NZX rules, the company pays - not the directors or executives.
-
25-07-2020, 11:50 AM
#103
Member
Originally Posted by Balance
Nothing will happen with the directors and managers because if anything is found to be in breach of NZX rules, the company pays - not the directors or executives.
The directors will have some kind of responsibility if it involves wilful blindness. Re: Mainzeal case.
$0.0015 x 100,000. shares = $150 as compare with
$0.15 x 100,000 shares = $ 15,000.
The mistake is obvious to the question of whether there are elements of wilful blindness and disregard. All these involve quality of forensic investigation and preparation.
Last edited by SpaceZ; 25-07-2020 at 11:56 AM.
-
25-07-2020, 12:39 PM
#104
Member
In the end the directors sign off the accounts...
-
25-07-2020, 03:28 PM
#105
Originally Posted by MarineSalvage
In the end the directors sign off the accounts...
Reminds me of a company not too long ago ( within the last year or so ) that I had shares in of a similar ilk as BGI that had a similar ( mistake !) in their published accounts that were ( released ) to the S Hers and public, when I noticed that ( mistake ) I notified the fish head on the board and reported to him my discovery , how can this be correct as to my mind the amount was two decimal points out, he said straight away , of course you are correct and withdrew the accounts for correction and rerelease .
So why did not this happen this time, do people not thoroughly read accounts that they have shares in when released, and if found to be incorrect notify the fish heads in the company?
-
25-07-2020, 04:09 PM
#106
What a great well planned heist!
-
25-07-2020, 06:13 PM
#107
Originally Posted by whatsup
Reminds me of a company not too long ago ( within the last year or so ) that I had shares in of a similar ilk as BGI that had a similar ( mistake !) in their published accounts that were ( released ) to the S Hers and public, when I noticed that ( mistake ) I notified the fish head on the board and reported to him my discovery , how can this be correct as to my mind the amount was two decimal points out, he said straight away , of course you are correct and withdrew the accounts for correction and rerelease .
So why did not this happen this time, do people not thoroughly read accounts that they have shares in when released, and if found to be incorrect notify the fish heads in the company?
ALF -- Allied Farmers was another one, post Share consolidation which had a NZX recorded NTA per share which also looked to be a complete screw up & that situation from memory went on unchanged for months afterwards on NZX Company data page..
-
25-07-2020, 06:19 PM
#108
Last edited by nztx; 25-07-2020 at 06:22 PM.
-
25-07-2020, 10:22 PM
#109
-
26-07-2020, 08:21 AM
#110
Originally Posted by MarineSalvage
In the end the directors sign off the accounts...
It's a wonder the auditors did not pick this up?
Ah, I see later that the accounts were correct, somewhere human error transposed a decimal point a few spaces along. Can happen, not the worst thing. But if in the interim some insiders sold their shares that is a bit naughty.
Last edited by blackcap; 26-07-2020 at 08:22 AM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks