-
28-02-2021, 01:06 AM
#651
-
01-03-2021, 09:32 AM
#652
Originally Posted by Balance
Oh dear! How is Cindy going to explain this one of her Coalition partner?
Why would she need to.
He applied, was turned down as the 'system' worked correctly.
No harm in trying.
-
01-03-2021, 09:47 AM
#653
Originally Posted by dobby41
Why would she need to.
He applied, was turned down as the 'system' worked correctly.
No harm in trying.
Because she has an answer for everything. Oops - excuse.
-
01-03-2021, 10:18 AM
#654
Originally Posted by Balance
Because she has an answer for everything. Oops - excuse.
Seems that you do too.
-
01-03-2021, 10:18 AM
#655
Originally Posted by dobby41
Why would she need to.
He applied, was turned down as the 'system' worked correctly.
No harm in trying.
Ms Ardern doesn't need to explain, and maybe nobody needs to do more explaining. Bad optics though when there are really heartbreaking stories in the media nearly every day. Which this one wasn't. Heartbreaking that is.
-
01-03-2021, 10:29 AM
#656
Originally Posted by artemis
Ms Ardern doesn't need to explain, and maybe nobody needs to do more explaining. Bad optics though when there are really heartbreaking stories in the media nearly every day. Which this one wasn't. Heartbreaking that is.
The media loves these stories which amount to nothing really - unless you have an axe to grind.
Since the Greens are just a support party what is there to explain (for Ardern) anyway?
Originally Posted by Balance
Oh dear! How is Cindy going to explain this one of her Coalition partner?
By the way balance - they aren't in a coalition.
-
01-03-2021, 11:22 AM
#657
Originally Posted by dobby41
The media loves these stories which amount to nothing really - unless you have an axe to grind.
Since the Greens are just a support party what is there to explain (for Ardern) anyway?
By the way balance - they aren't in a coalition.
What about Trevor Mallard?
-
01-03-2021, 12:01 PM
#658
Originally Posted by Balance
What about Trevor Mallard?
You have a habit of conflating things - I kept it to the topic at hand.
-
01-03-2021, 01:45 PM
#659
Originally Posted by dobby41
By the way balance - they aren't in a coalition.
They near as dammit are. They are a 'support party' with ministerial portfolios. What's in a name?
-
01-03-2021, 02:50 PM
#660
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
They near as dammit are. They are a 'support party' with ministerial portfolios. What's in a name?
They aren't!
What's in a name - as a support party Jacinda would have less interest in something like one of their members asking for preferential treatment at the border.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks