Labour govt 2020-23

[Balance]

Clueless Cindy’s soul mate, Finland’s PM, voted out.

Must admit Cindy is very smart about one thing and one thing only - self preservation.

She jumped before she got booted out.

Useless and fallen woman.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe...tight-election

[SBQ]

Clueless Cindy’s soul mate, Finland’s PM, voted out.

Must admit Cindy is very smart about one thing and one thing only - self preservation.

She jumped before she got booted out.

Useless and fallen woman.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/world/europe...tight-election

Watch for the WEC goons cry out that the world is not doing enough and insist people must support their WEC narrative.

[Balance]

Not a squeak from Labour and NZ First to questions about anti-corruption measures :

https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS8sk4ynr/

Very telling!

[Balance]

Andrea Vance calling a spade a spade. Labour's "grubby irony".

"This was an administration obsessed with keeping an iron grip on the control of information, despite farting out promises to be the most open, honest, and transparent in history."

https://www.stuff.co.nz/opinion/1316...t-nash-scandal

Maybe Andrea's been reading sharetrader!

Hipkins and the Labour Party along with their spin artists are trying to make fools of NZers with their 'cock-up' explanation for Stuart Nash's email cover-up. Fortunately, their deceitful behaviour has been uncovered along with their arrogance.

" Only the hopelessly jejune can take this explanation at face value.

It relies on the assumption that Stuart Nash’s ministerial advisors and two of Jacinda Ardern’s staffers could not recognise a very blatant breach of cabinet confidentiality.

Nor could they properly classify a document and apply freedom of information laws, even under the looming threat of an investigation by official information guardian, the chief Ombudsman.

(The email was withheld for being “out of scope” – Nash arguing it was sent in his capacity as an MP, which is not covered by official information rules, even though it explicitly discussed information he held as a minister).

Implausibly, none of this was picked up during at least three separate conversations between the prime minister’s office, Nash’s office and the Ombudsman?

Lastly, we would have to believe that two experienced aides at the heart of government could not spot a glaring political risk."

jejune - naive, simplistic and superficial

[Bill Smith]

Hipkins and the Labour Party along with their spin artists are trying to make fools of NZers with their 'cock-up' explanation for Stuart Nash's email cover-up. Fortunately, their deceitful behaviour has been uncovered along with their arrogance.

" Only the hopelessly jejune can take this explanation at face value.

It relies on the assumption that Stuart Nash’s ministerial advisors and two of Jacinda Ardern’s staffers could not recognise a very blatant breach of cabinet confidentiality.

Nor could they properly classify a document and apply freedom of information laws, even under the looming threat of an investigation by official information guardian, the chief Ombudsman.

(The email was withheld for being “out of scope” – Nash arguing it was sent in his capacity as an MP, which is not covered by official information rules, even though it explicitly discussed information he held as a minister).

Implausibly, none of this was picked up during at least three separate conversations between the prime minister’s office, Nash’s office and the Ombudsman?

Lastly, we would have to believe that two experienced aides at the heart of government could not spot a glaring political risk."

jejune - naive, simplistic and superficial

Vances writings will make the labour shills on sharetrader apoplectic.
Previously I have classed her as an ardern sycophant. Maybe she is further proof that wise people gravitate to the conservative spectrum as they get older.
Unlike dobby, bs, panda and tim.23 et al.

[jonu]

Our PM struggles when asked the most basic question. What is a woman? Says he hadn't come prepared for that question.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/amLibEgaqSs

This is what happens when you give into the lie of gender ideology. He literally doesn't know whether he's Arthur or Martha.

Emperor's New Clothes.

[ynot]

Our PM struggles when asked the most basic question. What is a woman? Says he hadn't come prepared for that question.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/amLibEgaqSs

This is what happens when you give into the lie of gender ideology. He literally doesn't know whether he's Arthur or Martha.

Emperor's New Clothes.

Classic mate. This one response from this idiot tells all you need to know.

[peetter]

Our PM struggles when asked the most basic question. What is a woman? Says he hadn't come prepared for that question.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/amLibEgaqSs

This is what happens when you give into the lie of gender ideology. He literally doesn't know whether he's Arthur or Martha.

Emperor's New Clothes.

Haha good question, you can see his brain erroring real time. Trying to figure out which way he's losing more voters. If he grew a pair and identified as a man, he might have actually gain couple percent of voters.

[nztx]

Our PM struggles when asked the most basic question. What is a woman? Says he hadn't come prepared for that question.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/amLibEgaqSs

This is what happens when you give into the lie of gender ideology. He literally doesn't know whether he's Arthur or Martha.

Emperor's New Clothes.

Even Cunliffe managed better some time back with his curious apology than Hipkins seems
to, in avoiding going anywhere near now .. the fractions in between must have Hipkins confused

[nztx]

You are a first class idiot - you have had some competition on this site but you win.

Oh look .. a mention in dispatches from the Village Idiot