-
28-06-2021, 04:25 PM
#1511
A scathing article in the Herald as well, written by Audrey Young, starting like this:
"In the four days since the Government outlined changes to "hate speech" law, it has become obvious from comments by the Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, that she does not understand them."
-
28-06-2021, 04:50 PM
#1512
Originally Posted by iceman
A scathing article in the Herald as well, written by Audrey Young, starting like this:
"In the four days since the Government outlined changes to "hate speech" law, it has become obvious from comments by the Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, that she does not understand them."
We don't need hate speech laws. Fair enough to legislate against inciting violence or vandalism. But if I decide to hate something, or someone, I'll dam well say so. (Not that I do - currently, but you never know who or what is going to get right up your nose). So legislate by all means but start by forgetting the inappropriate and corny 'hate speech' moniker. (Which would be close to impossible to define for a kick-off)
Last edited by fungus pudding; 28-06-2021 at 04:51 PM.
-
28-06-2021, 05:14 PM
#1513
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
We don't need hate speech laws. Fair enough to legislate against inciting violence or vandalism. But if I decide to hate something, or someone, I'll dam well say so. (Not that I do - currently, but you never know who or what is going to get right up your nose). So legislate by all means but start by forgetting the inappropriate and corny 'hate speech' moniker. (Which would be close to impossible to define for a kick-off)
The PM's position on the Christchurch call dictates some action must be announced.
Anyway, apparently the courts will be deciding. Which depends on what Police decide to prosecute.
(Planning to load up on popcorn company shares. )
-
28-06-2021, 05:49 PM
#1514
Originally Posted by artemis
The PM's position on the Christchurch call dictates some action must be announced.
Anyway, apparently the courts will be deciding. Which depends on what Police decide to prosecute.
(Planning to load up on popcorn company shares. )
I'd certainly hate to be the test case!
Perhaps the first case could be brought due to backlash against antivaxers if we fail to meet heard immunity targets, and are forced to continue fortress NZ? Hopefully not.
-
28-06-2021, 05:55 PM
#1515
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I'd certainly hate to be the test case!
Perhaps the first case could be brought due to backlash against antivaxers if we fail to meet heard immunity targets, and are forced to continue fortress NZ? Hopefully not.
I'd love to see a backlash against antivaxers ...
Hope loving is allowed in the proposed law?
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
28-06-2021, 05:59 PM
#1516
Originally Posted by tim23
Its never that simple, a nurse may own a home here or be with a partner with good income or may simply prefer to live in NZ - pure speculation on your part
I specificaly mentioned starting nurse, because young people without any ties are the most likely to leave. I did the same thing. However much I might like my place of origin, if I can make better living somewhere else, I'd be stupid not to.
-
28-06-2021, 06:02 PM
#1517
Originally Posted by Zaphod
I'd certainly hate to be the test case!
Perhaps the first case could be brought due to backlash against antivaxers if we fail to meet heard immunity targets, and are forced to continue fortress NZ? Hopefully not.
I wonder if the hate law is going to be universal or if it will specifically allow hate against middle aged white guys
-
28-06-2021, 08:09 PM
#1518
Originally Posted by peetter
I wonder if the hate law is going to be universal or if it will specifically allow hate against middle aged white guys
Of course it will. After all discrimination laws allow discrimination but only if it favours a minority.
Last edited by fungus pudding; 28-06-2021 at 08:13 PM.
-
29-06-2021, 08:35 AM
#1519
Originally Posted by peetter
I wonder if the hate law is going to be universal or if it will specifically allow hate against middle aged white guys
Young people are affected too. Admission to some University Courses can be determined by "verified" racial or national ancestry under the "Mirror on Society" selection policies. It will be interesting to see how criticism of such policies will be tolerated, and to what extent, under the new proposals.
-
29-06-2021, 09:09 AM
#1520
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
Of course it will. After all discrimination laws allow discrimination but only if it favours a minority.
Positive discrimination (which is what you are talking about) is quite different to hate speech.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks