-
26-01-2022, 04:37 PM
#4791
Originally Posted by davflaws
Well that's very clever, but doesn't address my point. So (in the hope that you will be willing to actually engage) let me restate it as best I can.
I have spent the last 50 years as a psychotherapist and employment advocate, dealing latterly with Family Violence and workplace bullying, and involved in the menz movement.
I have found that the majority of the people I have met hold other people to a higher moral standard and judge them more harshly than they judge themselves. I have observed that this is especially true of people who hold their own moral views particularly rigidly.
I was inviting you to examine your own beliefs and behavior.
I disagree that the majority of people hold other people to a higher moral standard and judge them more harshly than the judge themselves. On the surface they appear to do this, but if you look deeper judging other people’s moral failings is usually projection when people deny their own dark side and project it onto others. You will probably find that people who have rigid moral views have a lot of self-hatred.
Shaming people is a common practice in society. As a child I was called stupid, useless and given other negative labels. I wasn’t stupid but my behaviour may have been stupid. Often self-hatred is called low self-esteem or feeling insecure. But when I don’t meet my expectations, in other words when I don’t measure up, or when I’m not good enough then I have feelings of self-hatred. I get angry and I may blame other people and get angry at them, but if I am honest, I am angry at myself for not being “perfect.”
A person with genuine high self-esteem does not shame and judge other people’s moral failings. They accept that the person was doing their best at the time.
-
26-01-2022, 05:37 PM
#4792
Originally Posted by moka
I disagree that the majority of people hold other people to a higher moral standard and judge them more harshly than the judge themselves. On the surface they appear to do this, but if you look deeper judging other people’s moral failings is usually projection when people deny their own dark side and project it onto others. You will probably find that people who have rigid moral views have a lot of self-hatred.
Shaming people is a common practice in society. As a child I was called stupid, useless and given other negative labels. I wasn’t stupid but my behaviour may have been stupid. Often self-hatred is called low self-esteem or feeling insecure. But when I don’t meet my expectations, in other words when I don’t measure up, or when I’m not good enough then I have feelings of self-hatred. I get angry and I may blame other people and get angry at them, but if I am honest, I am angry at myself for not being “perfect.”
A person with genuine high self-esteem does not shame and judge other people’s moral failings. They accept that the person was doing their best at the time.
We are in agreement - mostly. But your explanation dives into "what is really going on" and that is ultimately unknowable in any particular case.
For myself - I have wrestled with my own internal processes all my adult life (latterly with more success).
Usually I can accept that everyone is doing their best with what they know and feel (even me), but most people I observe make excuses for themselves and judge other people at least some of the time, and I continue to catch myself doing just that more often than makes me comfortable.
-
26-01-2022, 05:40 PM
#4793
Originally Posted by davflaws
We are in agreement - mostly. But your explanation dives into "what is really going on" and that is ultimately unknowable in any particular case.
For myself - I have wrestled with my own internal processes all my adult life (latterly with more success).
Usually I can accept that everyone is doing their best with what they know and feel (even me), but most people I observe make excuses for themselves and judge other people at least some of the time, and I continue to catch myself doing just that more often than makes me comfortable.
You are writing about yourself - so keep it at that.
Meanwhile, in the fantasy world that Clueless Cindy, her supporters & you live in :
-
26-01-2022, 05:42 PM
#4794
Originally Posted by Panda-NZ-
It already has ended well, low unemployment and life savings protected.
Supply chain issues being resolved will help bring down the inflation.
If there is low or full employment as claimed, why would there be poverty out there?
Keep your lies & Cindy's spins & BS to yourself.
Last edited by Balance; 26-01-2022 at 05:55 PM.
-
26-01-2022, 06:18 PM
#4795
Labour fast-tracking about 150,000 people into residency to try to keep the housing market propped up.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-z...cy-scheme.html
Thousands become New Zealand residents under new fast-track skilled migrant residency scheme
By Gill Bonnett, 26/01/2022
About 5000 people have become residents under a fast-track government scheme launched last month, with migrants from India, South Africa, and Philippines topping the approvals.
Almost 30,000 people have so far applied for the one-off residence visa, and up to 165,000 may be eligible by the end of the year.
Migrants are eligible if they are settled (three years-plus in New Zealand including a minimum number of days), a skilled worker (based on wages) or scarce (in short supply).
Immigration statistics show migrants from India topped the approvals in the scheme's first month, followed by South Africa, Philippines, UK, and Sri Lanka. One in five applications was rejected.
-
26-01-2022, 06:18 PM
#4796
Originally Posted by Sir Ten
Ayesha gives me very little confidence these monkeys are capable of anything other than picking fleas off each other and eating them.
Using the word monkey is an intentional racial slur. It comes from a belief that brown people are lesser, sub-human, not fully evolved, savages, animals. And it is not okay, and it is not true. It is misinformation.
-
26-01-2022, 07:30 PM
#4797
Originally Posted by moka
Using the word monkey is an intentional racial slur. It comes from a belief that brown people are lesser, sub-human, not fully evolved, savages, animals. And it is not okay, and it is not true. It is misinformation.
\
Actually, referring to the nincompoops in government as monkeys is an insult to monkeys as monkeys are intelligent animals, compared to the drongos in Cindy's cabinet.
Last edited by Balance; 26-01-2022 at 09:00 PM.
-
26-01-2022, 07:56 PM
#4798
Member
Originally Posted by moka
Using the word monkey is an intentional racial slur. It comes from a belief that brown people are lesser, sub-human, not fully evolved, savages, animals. And it is not okay, and it is not true. It is misinformation.
You're a monkey too, given, like monkeys, you lack basic English comprehension skills.
Reference was to "these monkeys" - i.e. the Labour party, which includes monkeys of all races.
-
26-01-2022, 08:57 PM
#4799
Originally Posted by moka
Using the word monkey is an intentional racial slur. It comes from a belief that brown people are lesser, sub-human, not fully evolved, savages, animals. And it is not okay, and it is not true. It is misinformation.
I am at a complete loss to see how you consider Sir Ten's comments as racial in any way. Perhaps your race-obsessed, sub-concious mind automatically sees 'monkey' as an inferior brown person. Is this a case of the kettle calling the tea-pot black?
Last edited by fungus pudding; 26-01-2022 at 09:00 PM.
-
26-01-2022, 09:16 PM
#4800
Originally Posted by fungus pudding
I am at a complete loss to see how you consider Sir Ten's comments as racial in any way. Perhaps your race-obsessed, sub-concious mind automatically sees 'monkey' as an inferior brown person. Is this a case of the kettle calling the tea-pot black?
I see your dog whistle about the black tea-pot. Incipient racism everywhere. There are no grey areas anymore, we have to see everything in mauve and white.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks