-
10-02-2022, 09:14 AM
#5021
 Originally Posted by fungus pudding
A party that doesn't oppose every single utterance from the govt, will acheive a level of credibility. Opposing is a skill - and jumping up to rubbish everything as soon as the speaker is finished is predictable and silly. Better to agree ocasionally and find the right spots to wade in with a knock-out blow.
Like thats going to come from Goodfellows
team of woke losers. Yea Right !
Time for a change.
-
10-02-2022, 09:26 AM
#5022
Both parties are all-in on the 'Great New Zealand Housing Ponzi'. I'll be interested to see the choice that now gets made between saving the over-leveraged - including many recent first home buyers - or allowing inflation to rampage. And it was all going so well for Labour until inflation (inevitably) showed up.
-
10-02-2022, 09:30 AM
#5023
Amazing that if you go to the 'kiwibuild' website there are zero available homes. The page on the 'Mountview Green' development was last updated on 15 December 2021, and the page on the 'Cessna Place' development was last updated on 4 October 2021. An effective opposition would be hammering Megan Woods every day on this kind of thing.
-
10-02-2022, 09:49 AM
#5024
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
Amazing that if you go to the 'kiwibuild' website there are zero available homes. The page on the 'Mountview Green' development was last updated on 15 December 2021, and the page on the 'Cessna Place' development was last updated on 4 October 2021. An effective opposition would be hammering Megan Woods every day on this kind of thing.
Absolutely. How many chances are you prepared to give National. They are dead. Time for a change NZ.
-
10-02-2022, 09:58 AM
#5025
Originally Posted by ynot
Absolutely. How many chances are you prepared to give National. They are dead. Time for a change NZ.
They do seem to be far too timid at question time. Why aren't they hammering Labour for the absolute waste of $51 million paid out for a cycle bridge that will never be built? What about the $1 Billion annual bill for consultants and contractors? No opportunity to attack? Maybe they believe the '9 years of neglect' stuff themselves(?) Or maybe they can't attack Labour because they essentially have the same plan: run a giant property ponzi scheme & hope for the best.
-
10-02-2022, 11:18 AM
#5026
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
They do seem to be far too timid at question time. Why aren't they hammering Labour for the absolute waste of $51 million paid out for a cycle bridge that will never be built? What about the $1 Billion annual bill for consultants and contractors? No opportunity to attack? Maybe they believe the '9 years of neglect' stuff themselves(?) Or maybe they can't attack Labour because they essentially have the same plan: run a giant property ponzi scheme & hope for the best.
Drastic times call for drastic measures. I swore I would never say this but maybe its time to fight fire with fire.
Bring back Winston.
-
10-02-2022, 11:42 AM
#5027
Originally Posted by ynot
Drastic times call for drastic measures. I swore I would never say this but maybe its time to fight fire with fire.
Bring back Winston.
...so he can help prop up Labour. No thanks.
-
10-02-2022, 12:24 PM
#5028
Originally Posted by Logen Ninefingers
...so he can help prop up Labour. No thanks.
Do you have a better idea ?
-
10-02-2022, 12:42 PM
#5029
Bring back Whinney is a nightmare, not an idea.
-
10-02-2022, 12:59 PM
#5030
Winnie sold us this country down the river in 2017.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks