-
Member
 Originally Posted by Rawz
Am i reading it wrong? looks to me like they hold 53m and are selling 53 mill via jarden as the underwriter ?
I concur. But last year they sought to or even did increase their stake in the jet fuel supply business. (?) My knowledge based on about 15 seconds googling max.
-
Originally Posted by ronaldson
The 53.76m share sell-down is a "relatively" small proportion of Mobil's holding, but perhaps a canary for what is to come from the major players.
Yes, my bad. I should read SPH Notices more carefully! It is a total sell down of Mobil's holding.
-
Member
Major shareholder is able to sell out complete holding, 50 odd million shares, in one hit and the share price sits relatively still?
-
Member
Originally Posted by Bikeguy
Major shareholder is able to sell out complete holding, 50 odd million shares, in one hit and the share price sits relatively still?
Hopefully Jarden doesn’t start doing a MFB on their 50m shares
-
Member
Originally Posted by JSwan
Hopefully Jarden doesn’t start doing a MFB on their 50m shares
What is MFB?😅 cheers
-
Member
Originally Posted by Bikeguy
What is MFB?😅 cheers
My Food Bag? Apologies
-
debt/debt+equity= 37% for this bad boy. Too close to my 40% rule
-
Originally Posted by Rawz
debt/debt+equity= 37% for this bad boy. Too close to my 40% rule
Your rule is absolutely stupid and totally irrelevant.
Prior to the write downs what was the equity 'value' that your rule would have looked at??
Get your head out and start doing some real analysis
Apple debt to equity is too high for your stupid 'rule'
Get with the programme.
-
Originally Posted by SailorRob
Your rule is absolutely stupid and totally irrelevant.
Prior to the write downs what was the equity 'value' that your rule would have looked at??
Get your head out and start doing some real analysis
Apple debt to equity is too high for your stupid 'rule'
Get with the programme.
Lol, dont worry about it 
-
Originally Posted by Rawz
Lol, dont worry about it
Sorry for being harsh but damn this is about more than some arcane accounting ratio that has zero place in the real world.
It's debt to the assets ability to sustainable earn cash returns after all expenses that matters.
Some of the bet companies in the world require no equity.
Some of the worst are loaded with 'equity' that is worth nothing.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks