sharetrader
Page 13 of 297 FirstFirst ... 3910111213141516172363113 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 2969
  1. #121
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    175

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Gryffyn

    k - hardly overpaid given the returns to shareholders to date. What would you base their pay on?
    Berkshire Hathaway.

  2. #122
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    175

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Gryffyn

    k - hardly overpaid given the returns to shareholders to date. What would you base their pay on?
    Berkshire Hathaway.

  3. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Dunedin, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    299

    Default

    I'm out. So much for support at $2.

  4. #124
    Muppet Placebo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Lower Hutt, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    435

    Default

    LG: Given the price is the same as last year and they do a 1 for 10 split, you're actually up 10 percent? Correct me if I'm wrong.

    Interesting observation the other day, when I plotted by portfolio's performance on a month-to-month basis, the lines of four of my stocks (I have six) all described identical downward paths (CEN, AIA, WAM, FBU). Now, none of those shares had any particular news of note, the only common factor was the interest rate rise and general market sentiment.

    Oddly enough, the one I was sweating on the most (SKC) showed the least reduction in the period...

    Funny old world
    Marriage isn't a word. It's a sentence

  5. #125
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Dunedin, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    299

    Default

    Your point with reference to the split is a valid one. I hold FBU & WAM, but while the market is generally weak, there is no falling OBV etc. for those stocks. Also, although I know that I've held GPG over a longer term than say FBU & WAM, GPG was slowly becoming a weaker and weaker part of my portfolio. I'd happily consider buying back in, but I'd want to see some signs of returning strength. Assuming it dips below $1.90, I'll be up if I do end up buying back in.

    I purchased on August 14 1998, and calculated as annualised interest compounded monthly (so as to be comparable with the floating component of my mortgage), I've made 13.76% per annum. Not spectacular, but it's more than made up for some poorer ill-informed calls from the past.

  6. #126
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    Ted2 - You ask "Are you still holding most of your stocks or is the overall market trend reason enough to have got rid of many, even if there is no other reason for a particular stock going down than just being a victim of the overall market?"
    Ted, I sell purely on the technical aspects of each individual stock. As such, I do not concern myself with the "reasons" (known or unknown) for the weakness triggering the Sell. I worry about the overall market trend when/if buying, but do not attempt to factor that in when selling. I would not get rid of any stock on the basis of an overall market trend downward.
    So, I am still holding stocks like AIA, WAM, CEN. I have sold down others like FBU. I have completely sold out of FPA, NPX, STU and the like, including GPG of course - as per the chart in this thread.
    If you look at the individual charts I have posted for these stocks, I believe you could tell exactly when or if I have sold, and, more importantly, why.

  7. #127
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Heads up.

    If you've elected to receive script instead of divvies then my reading of the documents suggest that it is better to revoke your script mandate this year as the share price has fallen since the calculations etc.
    Fantasy Premier League 2006/07, 2007/08, and 2008/09 Champion :-)

    "The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." - C&H

  8. #128
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    639

    Default

    GPG
    29/04/2005
    GENERAL

    REL: 0856 HRS Guinness Peat Group Plc

    GENERAL: GPG: Information regarding Subsidiary

    Guinness Peat Group plc

    The following unaudited results of Coats Group Limited ("the Company") for
    the year to 31 December 2004 are released by Guinness Peat Group plc ("GPG")
    for information only. The Company, which became a subsidiary of GPG on 1
    April 2004, is the holding company of the Coats Group. The operations of the
    Coats Group comprise almost entirely the operations of Coats Holdings
    Limited, previously named Coats Ltd, which was acquired by the Company's
    subsidiary, Coats plc, on 7 April 2003.

    Richard Russell
    Company Secretary
    Guinness Peat Group plc

    28 April 2005

    Contact:
    Blake Nixon (UK) 020 7484 3370
    Gary Weiss (Australia) 00 61 2 8298 4302
    Tony Gibbs (New Zealand) 0064 9 379 8888

    28 April 2005

    Coats Group Limited: unaudited results* for the year to 31 December 2004

    Financial Summary

    2004
    US$m
    Like-for-like1
    2003
    US$m Period ended
    31 December
    2003
    US$m
    Turnover - Thread
    - Total 1,588
    1,712 1,535 1,139
    1,236

    Operating profit before reorganisation, impairment
    of fixed assets, goodwill amortisation and
    exceptional items - Thread
    - Total 105
    103 110 94
    89

    Operating Profit 36 69

    Pre-tax (loss)/profit (4) 47

    Net cash inflow from operating activities 200 135

    Capital expenditure 94 47

    Net debt 402 672

    Net gearing 86% 193%

    1 The 2003 like-for-like comparatives include a full twelve months for 2003
    and exclude the impact of exchange translation, acquisitions and disposals.

    *See note 8 for basis of preparation of this statement.

    Contacts:
    Roger Bevan Coats plc 020 8210 5000
    Blake Nixon Guinness Peat Group plc 020 7484 3370

    Chairman's statement

    Results

    In 2004, Coats Group Limited, in line with its operational objectives,
    delivered an exceptionally strong cash performance, albeit at the expense of
    underlying profit which was slightly lower.

    Net cash inflow from operating activities was US$199.7 million, including
    US$93.0 million due to improved management of working capital, and net debt
    was reduced by US$270.8 million. Although cash generation was the main
    priority, good progress was made in sales. Good growth of industrial thread
    in low-cost markets and strong crafts sales in North America more than offset
    the expected continued decline in industrial thread markets in Western Europe
    and North America. Overall, like-for-like growth in sales was 3% (see
    Operating and financial review), with 6% in crafts and 2% in industrial.

    The main disappointment was a slight decrease in underlying Thread operating
    margin - from 7.2% to 6.6% (as set out in the Operating and financial review)
    - due almost entirely to a sharp decline in activity in certain Western
    European industrial thread plants, as a result of accelerated migration of
    customers to low-cost regions and our stock reduction program. This offset
    benefits from earlier reorganisation projects. All other regions outside
    Europe delivered underlying growth in operating profit.

    The Company became a subsidiary of Guinness Peat Group plc on 1 April 2004.
    The operations of the Coats Group ("the Group") comprise almost entirely the
    operations of Coats Holdings Ltd, previously named Coats Ltd, which was
    acquired by the Company's subsidiary, Coats plc, on 7 April 2003. The
    reported comparative figures in the profit and loss and cash flow statements
    for 2003 therefore reflect Coats Holdings operations since that date. However
    in order to assist understanding of changes in underlying trading
    performance, pro-forma full year figures for 2003 have been provided in the
    segmental analysis in the Operating and financial review.

    Investment, reor
    Fantasy Premier League 2006/07, 2007/08, and 2008/09 Champion :-)

    "The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." - C&H

  9. #129
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    639

    Default

    And agan about the divvy / script - anyone else taking the cash over the script?
    Fantasy Premier League 2006/07, 2007/08, and 2008/09 Champion :-)

    "The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." - C&H

  10. #130
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Wellington, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    639

    Default

    Market seems to be reacting favourably to the result.
    Fantasy Premier League 2006/07, 2007/08, and 2008/09 Champion :-)

    "The surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." - C&H

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •