sharetrader
Page 31 of 37 FirstFirst ... 21272829303132333435 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 310 of 368

Thread: SCY Chart

  1. #301
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Sold ..or given away

    No value remaining for shareholders ...warned of that a while ago

    Never never fall in love with a share trading at a big discount to NTA ...wasn’t Smiths reported NTA 77 cents. Hope none of you were tempted ...PERCY and me tried to warn you off.


    http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...225/322677.pdf
    Most people keeping their jobs so a very good outcome.

    I hope you haven't fallen in love with MET and are just hanging in there for the 6 bucks... or was that 7 bucks now?

  2. #302
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,897

    Default

    Polar Capital’s Colin Neal said: “Smiths City has been part of the New Zealand retail landscape for more than 100 years. It is a trusted brand that has been synonymous with providing great quality, excellent value and attentive no-nonsense service.”
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #303
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    LA/ChCh/AKL
    Posts
    1,231

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Polar Capital’s Colin Neal said: “Smiths City has been part of the New Zealand retail landscape for more than 100 years. It is a trusted brand that has been synonymous with providing great quality, excellent value and attentive no-nonsense service.”
    Why buy it, can't see the value.

  4. #304
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Raz View Post
    Why buy it, can't see the value.
    Some might say Freightways gave them too too much for Big Chill ...ands theyve got to spend it somewhere

    But good on them anyway
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  5. #305
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    South of the Bombays
    Posts
    289

    Default

    I am surprised this is not a major transaction in terms of section 129 of the Companies Act 1993 requiring shareholder approval by 75% majority.

    If it isn’t due to some technicality, the legislation needs beefing up.

  6. #306
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,247

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Hope Big Chill man makes a go of the remains

    Methinks he’ll need a lot of luck

    But Smiths City survives eh PERCY
    Colin Neal's portfolio is not what I would call blue chip.Would certainly give me the "BIG CHILL".Hope springs eternal.?
    Mercer Group,Moa Group and now Smiths City.

  7. #307
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    103

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Sold ..or given away

    No value remaining for shareholders ...warned of that a while ago

    Never never fall in love with a share trading at a big discount to NTA ...wasn’t Smiths reported NTA 77 cents. Hope none of you were tempted ...PERCY and me tried to warn you off.


    http://nzx-prod-s7fsd7f98s.s3-websit...225/322677.pdf

    The transaction values the assets to be transferred to Polar Capital at around $60 million, however
    with the purchaser assuming some debt and other liabilities, the net amount expected to be received
    is $8 million.

    Would this not equate to 15 cents per share? Roughly the amount they are/were trading at...

  8. #308
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Lad View Post
    I am surprised this is not a major transaction in terms of section 129 of the Companies Act 1993 requiring shareholder approval by 75% majority.

    If it isn’t due to some technicality, the legislation needs beefing up.
    Agreed. Let her burn I say.

  9. #309
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,897

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyTheHorse View Post
    Most people keeping their jobs so a very good outcome.

    I hope you haven't fallen in love with MET and are just hanging in there for the 6 bucks... or was that 7 bucks now?
    No Johnny ...just punting with MET. Heads you win tail you don’t lose they say.

    In tandem with NTA suppose you’ve got to consider Net Realisable Value. Is the paper value worth thst in a fire sale?

    Always dodgy with Smiths but with MET it’s real property and even in a ‘fire sale’ they’d get real cash.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #310
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Southern Lad View Post
    I am surprised this is not a major transaction in terms of section 129 of the Companies Act 1993 requiring shareholder approval by 75% majority.

    If it isn’t due to some technicality, the legislation needs beefing up.
    I think it went into liquidation first. That's the technicality.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •