sharetrader
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 34567
Results 61 to 69 of 69

Thread: Property rocks

  1. #61
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    20

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Cooper

    quote:Originally posted by PGL
    You've got to ask where this leads for us as a society.
    Well, under the basic scenario you've been describing, under which the demand for capital increases, and the supply of labour similarly increases... All else held constant that results in the relative returns for capital goods growing, and those who hold capital becoming wealthier. Meanwhile the relative returns on Labour have decreased due to increased supply, so those who contribute labour receive less return for their input, in a relative sense. So under that scenario, you work more for relatively less, and those who are already wealthy grow wealthier as the proportion of return for capital input increases and labour costs decrease.

    Not an analysis of the current situation, just an extension of the example discussed here.
    Well, I guess I already knew that in my heart of hearts.

    I was hoping for a more optimistic outlook - revolution perhaps?

  2. #62
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dunedin, New Zealand.
    Posts
    193

    Default

    Maybe, but if that very simple scenario is applicable then there is a point at which the demand for capital goods will reduce, because the market for those goods is predominantly those who provide labour, so the decrease in relative wealth for those whose main input is labour will also lead to a decrease in the demand for capital goods. In this instance it would be in the best interests of all concerned (particularly those providing the capital) to ensure that the discrepancies aren't large enough to warrant revolution. Time and the "invisible hand" would bring it back into equilibrium, in other words.

    Undisputed 2006 World Cup Premierleague Champion

  3. #63
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    20

    Default

    It's late but I guess we are talking 'supply and demand' here

    What troubles me is that we are moving (by stealth) to a different point on the supply demand curve than we were at say 20 years ago - vis-a-vis what the average joe/joess got for the number of hours that he/she worked.

    So at what point does it come to equilibrium, and more importantly, why has the equilibrium shifted - the invisible hand perhaps?


    Disc - no idea whether or not you put a question mark on a rhetorical question. Sad really, I can ask them but I can't punctuate them!

  4. #64
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Dunedin, New Zealand.
    Posts
    193

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by PGL

    It's late but I guess we are talking 'supply and demand' here

    What troubles me is that we are moving (by stealth) to a different point on the supply demand curve than we were at say 20 years ago - vis-a-vis what the average joe/joess got for the number of hours that he/she worked.

    So at what point does it come to equilibrium, and more importantly, why has the equilibrium shifted - the invisible hand perhaps?


    Disc - no idea whether or not you put a question mark on a rhetorical question.
    Yeah... it's too late in the day for me to say much of any intelligence. Why has the equilibrium shifted? Social factors maybe? Living beyond your means; cheap credit and/or expensive credit not being properly preceived as such, coinciding with a more materialistic way of valuing one's worth? Leading to increased indebtedness and the purchase of consumption goods that don't generate an economic return (the lack of ability to differentiate a true need from a perceived need which is actually a want), but which serves to increase a society's productivity, so as to give the perception that average "wealth" is growing. All leading to the individual needing to make the decision to increase their labour supply (working more) whilst also increasing the return on capital (by demanding more capital goods) which subsequently decreases the relative return on labour, leading to a bit of a downward spiral. I'm just making it up as I go but it makes sense at half past 12 on a tuesday morning.

    The argument for why the equilibrium has/has not shifted would probably depend on what the individual would be proposing as a cure (if any!). An economic liberal would just claim it's the symptom of a productive society and the individual's decision to work more to increase their utility, a marxist would claim it's an example of the capitalist class using their might to gain extra leverage over the proletariat. Both would make the diagnosis on the basis of justifying the cure they have in mind to fix it.
    Undisputed 2006 World Cup Premierleague Champion

  5. #65
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Just a note from the field.

    Took a half hour ride on a Auckland ferry to a far flung suburb.

    A 1980's Fibrolite on 1/4 acre with no view going for $510,000.

    Sections in adjacent new development selling for $280,000.

    Assured by ferry boat driver prices still have a long way to go and will double.

    Reminds me of that story about the shoe shine boy who gave a tip to that great share market investor who then immediately sold out of the market that day.

  6. #66
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    , , Australia.
    Posts
    176

    Default

    In answer to your first question, yes very good returns are obtainable by investing in property.
    So if good returns = rocks, then yes property can ‘rock’.

    I disagree with your comment that gearing is gambling. It all depends on what you do with the borrowed money.

    To your example… a share price increase of 3.91x is certainly a very healthy return for a 12 month period. Congratulations!

    If you could have done so, knowing what you knew about that stock a year ago, would you have borrowed $80k for every $20k of your own money and used the funds to buy more of that particular stock? Based on the fact that the share price went up by 3.91x in 12 months the company in question probably had/still has a pretty small market cap, and I’m guessing there’s no way a bank would lend to an 80% LVR on such a stock. A personal loan is always an option though.

    Your example is partly hypothetical because you didn’t actually borrow the money, you just looked back at one particular share you hold that has appreciated a lot in the last year, and concluded that shares must be better than borrowing for real estate.

  7. #67
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    , , Australia.
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Hi aspex.

    Yes you're right, I made a few incorrect assumptions.
    So now I'm eating humble pie. [:I]

    That's a great return! Good on you.

    Perhaps I ought to educate myself on how CFD's work and then if it makes sense and I feel comfortable with it, give it a go, starting small of course.

    What did you do to get educated & started?

    Thanks for posting.

  8. #68
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    , , Australia.
    Posts
    176

    Default

    Thanks.

  9. #69
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Location
    auckland, , Azerbaijan.
    Posts
    31

    Default

    Property on the rocks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •