sharetrader
Page 44 of 201 FirstFirst ... 344041424344454647485494144 ... LastLast
Results 431 to 440 of 2009
  1. #431
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    hastings, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    635

    Default

    So Lawso.... are you saying you would be happy to give all your money.. to Chris Lee.. to clip the ticket..and then invest on your behalf in a company run by Kev... your starting to sound like a Tui advert mate !!!! or maybe you did !

  2. #432
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    765

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lawso View Post
    Croesus, you should find about a bit more about the topic before posting such posting such utter tosh.
    With you Lawso
    BB

  3. #433
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    , Auckland , New Zealand.
    Posts
    337

    Default

    Croesus: I do my own research and my own investing, mostly online. I've only once been in a managed fund and I've never paid for financial advice. But if I did want to hand all the responsibility over to a broker or adviser Lee would be one of my first choices. IMO he rates at or near the top for integrity and know-how. Repeat, integrity.
    Last edited by Lawso; 18-04-2009 at 12:04 PM.

  4. #434
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    hastings, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    635

    Default

    Integrity ?? Lawso... hmmp

    Lawso
    I guess you are entitled to your Opinion... as are Clare and John Lindsay.. retired .... who on asking Chris Lee for a conservative portfolio.. ended up with a worthless bundle of St Laurence notes, Dorchestor debentures, Hanover Capital Pref Shares.. thats good... North and South notes... shakes Head.. ( theres more.. but the point is made)

    Chris Lee's work was rubbished by a Senior Spicers Planner....as a portfolio a DIY newbie would present.....

    Read Rob Stocks article in Sunday Star Times.. a couple of weeks back...

    Integrity.... yeah right..

    cheers Lawso, and Bob.

    ps... hav'nt seen any legal action against Sunday Star Times or Spicers yet... wonder why

  5. #435
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    , Auckland , New Zealand.
    Posts
    337

    Default

    So let's agree to disagree. I see no point in continuing this silly argument.

  6. #436
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    hastings, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    635

    Default

    Fair enough.... Lawso I am getting bored with this....I just get peeved with so called advisors who put themselves on a pedastal.... and then the misguided preaching "integrity" to me .. so lets stop now....on the evidence I have presented....you obviously agree your original statement was in your words " utter tosh".....

    no hard feelings.... to be fair to Chris Lee we all foul up every now and then....and it was probably one of his staff who wrote the afore mentioned disaster of a portfolio.... and compared to the Blue Chip scum he is a Saint.

    cheers Croesus.

  7. #437
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Can someone give me a quick lesson on what is meant by Cap Rate which is frequently referred to in LPT literature, I know that when NAV falls the Cap Rate rises but what exactly is it - a ratio?

  8. #438
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Excelsior View Post
    Can someone give me a quick lesson on what is meant by Cap Rate which is frequently referred to in LPT literature, I know that when NAV falls the Cap Rate rises but what exactly is it - a ratio?

    It's the capitilisation rate. Yes it's the ratio formed by the price relative to income. A building with a rental income of 100,000 capitalised at 10% makes the building worth $1 mlllion.
    If the prevailing cap rates for say an industrial building in Boomtown is 8% then by knowing the rent, you can quickly establish it's value. An 8% cap rate means the bldg is worth 12.5 times the rent. (100 divided by 8 = 12.5) So if it's returning 60k the value will be 750k.
    It all gets a bit confusing as most commercial bldgs are net leases (tenant pays outgoings) so cap rate is accurate. Unfortunately most residential properties quote cap rates on the gross income, which strictly speaking is incorrect. Should be on the net.

  9. #439
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Thnx for that. Thinking of buying some KIP at current levels but came across a Herald article from Feb 4 with Bruce Sheppard quoted as below

    Shareholders Association chairman Bruce Sheppard criticised the LPT sector generally and warned against it.
    He said reading research reports without taking into account the somewhat unusual structure of LPTs or the future of their businesses was flawed.
    "The NTAs are the asset values unencumbered by a management contract," Sheppard said. "The discount has always been an issue with these stocks as the management arrangements, in essence, encumber the assets by the unbreakable costs of management which are often not value for money."
    LPTs appeared to be good value now but he questioned how long this would last because the sector depended on rents flowing regularly, and current rates were unrealistic, particularly in large shopping centres.
    "The divided yields are currently attractive and may well be reasonably sustainable until the tenants start falling over which is likely, especially for retail funds which all have grossly over-sold retail space and are a disaster just waiting to happen."

    Is situation any worse for LPTs than other companies. Management still does well as shareholders suffer.

  10. #440
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Excelsior View Post
    Thnx for that. Thinking of buying some KIP at current levels but came across a Herald article from Feb 4 with Bruce Sheppard quoted as below

    Shareholders Association chairman Bruce Sheppard criticised the LPT sector generally and warned against it.
    He said reading research reports without taking into account the somewhat unusual structure of LPTs or the future of their businesses was flawed.
    "The NTAs are the asset values unencumbered by a management contract," Sheppard said. "The discount has always been an issue with these stocks as the management arrangements, in essence, encumber the assets by the unbreakable costs of management which are often not value for money."
    LPTs appeared to be good value now but he questioned how long this would last because the sector depended on rents flowing regularly, and current rates were unrealistic, particularly in large shopping centres.
    "The divided yields are currently attractive and may well be reasonably sustainable until the tenants start falling over which is likely, especially for retail funds which all have grossly over-sold retail space and are a disaster just waiting to happen."

    Is situation any worse for LPTs than other companies. Management still does well as shareholders suffer.
    To answer last point first: no worse, but in my view a hell of a lot safer because owning buildings doesn't really require great skill, therefore lower risk. Shepard is partly right; there are management costs, but unavoidable for an individual who wants to get involved with substantial commercial properties. I'm not sure that retail rents are as vulnerable as he thinks, it's anyone's guess, but NZ seems to be reasonably safe. At current prices I reckon some LPTs are a steal, KIP being one. I like ING. I only invest in real estate, and real estate shares. Don't know the first thing about other shares, except they all seem too risky to me compared to a pile of bricks on a commercial or industrial site..

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •