-
25-10-2018, 10:11 PM
#11351
Originally Posted by Muppett
I like it.
The Trougher is seeking election to the Board. Maybe she doesn't get on!
The larger the company the less the need for a CEO to be a Director. She has shown a lack of foresight with the sale of 100% of her shares which ought to put her CEO job at risk. This instantly disqualifies her for consideration for a Board position. The money aside (how big a deck has she got) she should not need a Director role - she should recognize her CEO role should consume 100% of her business attention. If she has spare time she should take a pro-rata drop in CEO rem.
-
25-10-2018, 10:18 PM
#11352
Member
Originally Posted by minimoke
The larger the company the less the need for a CEO to be a Director. She has shown a lack of foresight with the sale of 100% of her shares which ought to put her CEO job at risk. This instantly disqualifies her for consideration for a Board position. The money aside (how big a deck has she got) she should not need a Director role - she should recognize her CEO role should consume 100% of her business attention. If she has spare time she should take a pro-rata drop in CEO rem.
I stand corrected, but I am pretty sure it was stated a couple of days ago in an AGM resolution to the market/shareholders for the forthcoming AGM that the Trougher has the full backing of all current Board members in seeking election to the Board as a Director. If passed, she will be a Managing Director and CEO.
-
25-10-2018, 10:22 PM
#11353
Question for the agm. Is the CEO role a full or part time position?
-
25-10-2018, 10:22 PM
#11354
Originally Posted by 777
Just did my voting for AGM online. Voted against all current directors up for re election.
Ditto, felt especially good voting against the increase in Directors fees and Herd Licker.PS-Can we now have a vote on the CEO position please.
-
25-10-2018, 10:23 PM
#11355
Originally Posted by minimoke
Question for the agm. Is the CEO role a full or part time position?
Come on mini, the lady needs her tennis time.
-
25-10-2018, 10:33 PM
#11356
Member
I stand somewhat corrected from my previous post:
A quote from the ATM website: "Jayne commenced as Managing Director and CEO of the Company on 16 July 2018."
So she is currently an MD and CEO but is seeking re-election (???) as an MD at the next AGM.
As already stated: she has the full support of the current Board members for this.
She is also currently a non-executive President of Tennis Australia.
Last edited by Muppett; 25-10-2018 at 10:34 PM.
-
25-10-2018, 11:26 PM
#11357
Member
Minor holder, voted.
Yes to freeze fee and no to all. Won’t make a difference as minor holder but this is all i can do.
-
26-10-2018, 07:01 AM
#11358
Originally Posted by couta1
Come on mini, the lady needs her tennis time.
Too busy to take a governance role as a Director then
-
26-10-2018, 07:01 AM
#11359
Originally Posted by ohpark0119
Minor holder, voted.
Yes to freeze fee and no to all. Won’t make a difference as minor holder but this is all i can do.
Always worth voting. Gives us the moral ground to bleat.
-
26-10-2018, 08:54 AM
#11360
Member
Originally Posted by minimoke
The larger the company the less the need for a CEO to be a Director. She has shown a lack of foresight with the sale of 100% of her shares which ought to put her CEO job at risk. This instantly disqualifies her for consideration for a Board position. The money aside (how big a deck has she got) she should not need a Director role - she should recognize her CEO role should consume 100% of her business attention. If she has spare time she should take a pro-rata drop in CEO rem.
Couldn't agree more, she has no loyalty to the firm, being a Director and a CEO of the same company, isn't that called double dipping.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks