sharetrader
  1. #16961
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    In the trough
    Posts
    766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    Good points. Obviously - nobody can foresee the future ... and if for some reason their biggest market (China) decides to discriminate against NZ product (as they currently do against US and Australian product), then EPS (and with it share price) trend well might take a dip.

    Not saying this is going to happen, but just one risk shareholders need to be aware of. A2M is a classical high risk - high reward story.
    Some Aussies seem to think it's theirs anyway (the dangers of being on the ASX). Hopefully the Chinese are able to discriminate (the differentiate meaning of the word of course ).

  2. #16962
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclical View Post
    It's effectively another form of shorting is it not, something that you seem to be the master of. I've done it on the odd occasion myself, although usually I get the timing completely wrong and it comes with regret!
    Exactly, its basically shorting your own shares, done in a controlled manner it is an excellent strategy and a good way to stay positive during difficult times.

  3. #16963
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    In the trough
    Posts
    766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    Exactly, its basically shorting your own shares, done in a controlled manner it is an excellent strategy and a good way to stay positive during difficult times.
    Umm, noob question here...it's something I've been struggling to find the answer on but keen to know. From a tax perspective, and I know it's very grey in NZ, but your strategy there could potentially realise a loss on the books, which would be mean less tax to pay (assuming you're classified as a trader) come return time, which would be a nice little bonus to such a strategy (especially if you manage to buy back in at a lower price). But would tax be calculated on the realised gain/loss only, or are we supposed to work it out on capital gain too, or are there different options for calculating, or is it all just too grey?

    Sorry for the deviation from topic.

  4. #16964
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclical View Post
    Umm, noob question here...it's something I've been struggling to find the answer on but keen to know. From a tax perspective, and I know it's very grey in NZ, but your strategy there could potentially realise a loss on the books, which would be mean less tax to pay (assuming you're classified as a trader) come return time, which would be a nice little bonus to such a strategy (especially if you manage to buy back in at a lower price). But would tax be calculated on the realised gain/loss only, or are we supposed to work it out on capital gain too, or are there different options for calculating, or is it all just too grey?

    Sorry for the deviation from topic.
    Tax would only be payable on any realised trading gain and yes a loss on the books means less or no tax to pay, capital gains are not taxable if there is no sole profit intent upon purchase, our current system is however as you say grey.

  5. #16965
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by couta1 View Post
    So it is possible to teach an old bull new tricks, sure you can just hold and wait until the price comes back to your avg buy in price or you can be proactive and end up with more shares once it does come back up, every extra 100 shares equals 2 grand approx, you have gained money because you end up holding more shares than you originally had.
    eh so your buy more shares after selling them for a loss and hope like hell they go up because if they go down after your brought more then your just be making more big losses with those extra shares. sounds very risky you must be very good at timing the market to make this work.

    i would think a better strategy would be to own the stock and short it with cfd's in another account .
    if you think its going to decline that way you protect your capital position. take off the short when you think its going to go back up and wohoo not only have you lost nothing but your enjoy even more gains on the way up. of course if it continued to go up you would lose. so no strategy is without risks to some degree
    Last edited by bull....; 18-09-2020 at 12:00 PM.
    one step ahead of the herd

  6. #16966
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    In the trough
    Posts
    766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    eh so your buy more shares after selling them for a loss and hope like hell they go up because if they go down after your brought more then your just be making more big losses with those extra shares. sounds very risky you must be very good at timing the market to make this work.

    i would think a better strategy would be to own the stock and short it with cfd's in another account .
    if you think its going to decline that way you protect your capital position. take off the short when you think its going to go back up and wohoo not only have you lost nothing but your enjoy even more gains on the way up. of course if it continued to go up you would lose. so no strategy is without risks to some degree
    He's hoping to sell at ~$18, then spend the same amount of money to buy ~5% more shares at ~$17. I'm not sure how that is hard to understand. Sure there's risk, it might bump back up and he has to buy back in at ~$19 and effectively have ~5% less shares for the same money. But no more or less risky than shorting as far as I can see. Plus a potential tax advantage as discussed above.

  7. #16967
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclical View Post
    He's hoping to sell at ~$18, then spend the same amount of money to buy ~5% more shares at ~$17. I'm not sure how that is hard to understand. Sure there's risk, it might bump back up and he has to buy back in at ~$19 and effectively have ~5% less shares for the same money. But no more or less risky than shorting as far as I can see. Plus a potential tax advantage as discussed above.
    being able to claim a tax loss is not something i would consider good because it means you actually lost a lot more capital. i would rather pay tax
    one step ahead of the herd

  8. #16968
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    850

    Default

    According to AFR

    "Bortolussi will take up the top job early in 2021, just as Babidge prepares for the delivery of his new motor cruiser boat. Babidge also recently purchased a home in the NSW Southern Highlands, where he will spend time with family, although it might be a while until his son, daughter-in-law and two grandchildren can visit from New York City.

    Seems like a legit reason to cash in some shares......

  9. #16969
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    In the trough
    Posts
    766

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    being able to claim a tax loss is not something i would consider good because it means you actually lost a lot more capital. i would rather pay tax
    Let's say you've been busy trading since April the 1st and in that time you'd realised a $100k gain (we'll run with easy numbers for argument's sake). You're in the top tax bracket, so you're currently staring down the barrel of a $33k tax bill for your trading efforts. You've got $1m worth of ATM stock with an average buy of $20/share. It pulls back to $18, you sell, booking a loss of $100k. You buy back in tomorrow at about the same price. You've still got the same assets (capital) as you had the day before, plus you won't be paying a $33k tax bill next year. Meanwhile the shares are at $25 come March 31 next year, but you won't be selling them, so still no tax.

    Have I got that right, Couta? Beagle, you're our resident accountant, no? Am I off the mark?

  10. #16970
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    8,516

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cyclical View Post
    Let's say you've been busy trading since April the 1st and in that time you'd realised a $100k gain (we'll run with easy numbers for argument's sake). You're in the top tax bracket, so you're currently staring down the barrel of a $33k tax bill for your trading efforts. You've got $1m worth of ATM stock with an average buy of $20/share. It pulls back to $18, you sell, booking a loss of $100k. You buy back in tomorrow at about the same price. You've still got the same assets (capital) as you had the day before, plus you won't be paying a $33k tax bill next year. Meanwhile the shares are at $25 come March 31 next year, but you won't be selling them, so still no tax.

    Have I got that right, Couta? Beagle, you're our resident accountant, no? Am I off the mark?
    You understand.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •