-
01-02-2021, 12:09 PM
#19781
Goes to show how it is a box-ticking, virtuous looking, nationalistic agenda, rather than really trying to do what is best and has the lowest emissions. Making sure we meet our obligations to climate accords, no matter how little difference it will make, or what economic damage it will do.
On a farming/A2 perspective, part of the issue is the emissions falls back on the producer. But with oil, it falls on the consumer.......don't see the Saudi's trying to plant pine tress.
-
01-02-2021, 12:21 PM
#19782
Originally Posted by Gregnz
How does it end up that our politicians are so out of touch with reality, that their proposed climate initiatives actually have the opposite affect to what the world is trying to achieve.
Im no scientist, no politician, if normal everyday people like me are questioning these things, I’m very concerned at what our future holds.
As a scientist, I can assure you the answer is simple: reduce the human population to one hundredth of its current size. That is likely the only answer, but it is at that point that the politicians get involved and start complicating things again.
-
01-02-2021, 01:30 PM
#19783
Maybe its better to walk?
The amount of emissions' to produce a 1 kg eye fillet in Denmark is the same emission's as driving from Denmark to Paris
-
01-02-2021, 01:38 PM
#19784
Are we entitled to ask what Rod Carr's qualifications are to chair the climate change commission? Previously a Reserve Bank economist - on the one hand this, but on the other .... - and last heard of, the Vice Chancellor of Canterbury University. Eminently suitable for the climate change role?
-
01-02-2021, 01:52 PM
#19785
Member
Originally Posted by kiora
Maybe its better to walk?
The amount of emissions' to produce a 1 kg eye fillet in Denmark is the same emission's as driving from Denmark to Paris
Fake news ?
-
01-02-2021, 02:03 PM
#19786
Originally Posted by freddagg
Fake news ?
No sadly for real
-
01-02-2021, 03:41 PM
#19787
outta the short , why bubs result not too bad as far as sales go and the gme thing makes holding shorts risky now. great trade anyway $20 to just under $11
one step ahead of the herd
-
01-02-2021, 03:55 PM
#19788
Originally Posted by kiora
Maybe its better to walk?
The amount of emissions' to produce a 1 kg eye fillet in Denmark is the same emission's as driving from Denmark to Paris
Does it take more emissions to grow a kg of eye fillet than to grow a kg of rump steak?
-
01-02-2021, 04:48 PM
#19789
Originally Posted by bull....
outta the short , why bubs result not too bad as far as sales go and the gme thing makes holding shorts risky now. great trade anyway $20 to just under $11
Well done bull....... I like and have a sizable holding in Bubs also
-
01-02-2021, 10:27 PM
#19790
Originally Posted by Biscuit
Does it take more emissions to grow a kg of eye fillet than to grow a kg of rump steak?
No
why would it?
They are both only muscle
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks