-
16-06-2015, 05:08 PM
#3701
Member
Originally Posted by Lola
Seems the Super boys have a different view on the stock than Milfie did. By the way where's that FMA file gone ??
Disappeared into the too hard basket I suspect. They may have shat in their own nest over this because I can't see how they can treat Milford any differently than the way Hulich was treated in a similar "manipulation" issue. That's a fine and losing their licence to operate as a kiwisaver provider. I doubt they will go that far though and likely come up with some politically correct bull**** to prevent that.
I think that the fact that NZSF is staying in there with a reasonable holding is a good sign though (as long as it lasts) I think they just wanted to get under the 5% threshold. Who knows!
-
16-06-2015, 09:40 PM
#3702
Member
Originally Posted by Harrie
Disappeared into the too hard basket I suspect. They may have shat in their own nest over this because I can't see how they can treat Milford any differently than the way Hulich was treated in a similar "manipulation" issue. That's a fine and losing their licence to operate as a kiwisaver provider. I doubt they will go that far though and likely come up with some politically correct bull**** to prevent that.
I think that the fact that NZSF is staying in there with a reasonable holding is a good sign though (as long as it lasts) I think they just wanted to get under the 5% threshold. Who knows!
Well if FMA can their goose chase , then if I was Milfie Id be mad as hell and get a QC on the job.
-
17-06-2015, 07:32 AM
#3703
Bounced off resistance at 59 again,i wondered whether there would be a catalyst to push the stock higher,but the opposite happened yet again,could this be the most predictable trading stock at the mo,at the risk of getting egg on my face I'm going to have a go.
-
17-06-2015, 11:26 AM
#3704
Member
It will remain in the $0.53 to $0.58 range (maybe 0.59 given the NZ$ depreciation) until we get some information on sales volume numbers in target markets.
-
17-06-2015, 12:55 PM
#3705
FYI Bella Katz: a2 Milk sues ABC, but still lacks evidence
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/n...ectid=11465965
-
17-06-2015, 05:54 PM
#3706
Originally Posted by silu
Bella Katz is not a scientist but a brand and marketing consultant out to promote herself or possibly to sow confusion among the public on behalf of a client (perhaps one of a2MC's rivals?). She's ignorant of the science and her opinion will count for nothing if and when the case goes to court.
-
17-06-2015, 05:56 PM
#3707
Member
Originally Posted by silu
Inconclusive evidence does not win court cases.
-
17-06-2015, 06:37 PM
#3708
Originally Posted by Harrie
Inconclusive evidence does not win court cases.
Well I don't think we really know at this stage who has to prove what. If ABC has to prove A2 Milk is outright BS, it might have a problem, even if it is able to prove there are still differences of opinion over some scientific details (actually there aren't many).
-
18-06-2015, 01:33 PM
#3709
NZ First Capital getting in on the act. SSH of 33,324,572 about 5%
-
18-06-2015, 01:39 PM
#3710
Originally Posted by see weed
NZ First Capital getting in on the act. SSH of 33,324,572 about 5%
Good on them
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks