In recent annual reports, the table figures are derived from section C7. Note figures in italics in table below are estimates
Doubtful Debt Provisions {A} Current Trade and Other Receivables (before provisioning) less Other Receivables (Estimates comes from FY2016) equals Current Trade Receivables {B} {A}/{B} EOFY2014 $0.377m $24.677m $3.637m $21.040m 1.79% EOFY2015 $0.342m $27.996m $3.637m $24.349m 1.40% EOFY2016 $0.589m $33.706m $3.637m $30.069m 1.96% EOFY2017 $0.897m $46.430m $5.332m $41.098m 2.18% EOFY2018 $0.143m+ $0.160m(*) $42.133m $4.149m $37.984m 0.38%
(*) Doubtful debts for 'other receivables' as separated out in FY2018 results are not included in trade receivable doubtful debt calculation.
On the surface there seems to be a big percentage drop off in the doubtful debt provision, all due to management's resolve to keep a close eye on doubtful debts. I am not clear what the 'other' receivables are., and why there is a doubtful debt provision against those for the first time.
The $1.3m write off that Winner alludes to happened in the FY2016 year. It doesn't tally with making an appearance in the above table though. Did it come in a hurry after being swept under the carpet in double quick time so as not to tarnish the end of year table? I think all hope is lost for a return of any of that money.
SNOOPY
Bookmarks