sharetrader
Page 5 of 240 FirstFirst 1234567891555105 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 2400
  1. #41
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,895

    Default

    thx phaedrus-your chart is clear and now is not the time to buy whilst they are on a steep downtrend .

  2. #42
    Senior Member ananda77's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,465

    Default

    ...cen approaching key-support @575

    ...set your cen trading strategy

    Indicators:

    DMI40
    W%R150


    <center></center>

  3. #43
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    Chart update. CEN has now broken below its long-term trendline, confirming the medium-term trendline break "Sell" signal posted on 12/10/2005. (Medium-term trendlines are shown in magenta)


  4. #44
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    PHAEDRUS, My time line system is in total agreement. If you take the starting price at $2-20 as the starting point at the jan 2000 year then draw a 20pc time line in advance look at all the trouble you would save yourself.
    Lets have a bit of fun in hindesight and compare. 2001 = $2.64,
    2002 = $3.16, 2003 = $3.79, 2004 = $4.54, 2005 = $5.44, 2006 = $6.52,
    Jan 2007 I require the sp to be $7,82 less what ever level i placed my stop loss. I would be holding with it on close watch at this moment in a long term portfolio. It has been a great share to hold long term i chose TPW to best it in this sector, which is proving so far to be the better choice from when i bought in oct 2004 at an average $4.84. macdunk

  5. #45
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    Ah yes Duncan, but there is a big difference.
    I posted my Sell signal way back when it was triggered.
    You are only just now telling us about yours!

  6. #46
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Phaedrus

    Ah yes Duncan, but there is a big difference.
    I posted my Sell signal way back when it was triggered.
    You are only just now telling us about yours!
    PHAEDRUS, My one has not triggered so far but it is close.
    Draw the line at jan 2006 at$6.52 to jan 2007 at $7.82 then allow with a long term hold like this a 10pc stop loss. I am not saying i am right or wrong i dont hold this share but that would be my sell point. I think that a close to seven year hold at 20pc plus dividends deserves a bit of leeway with a 10pc stop loss. If your system says sell, then sell, my system says hold on close watch. What i found interesting is the closeness of the sell point after six and a half years. macdunk

    macdunk

  7. #47
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,936

    Default

    "My time line system is in total agreement"
    Well, no it's not, actually.

    "If you take the starting price at $2-20 as the starting point at the jan 2000 year then draw a 20pc time line in advance look at all the trouble you would save yourself"
    Well Duncan, you would certainly have saved yourself all the trouble of holding CEN for 6 years! Using the startpoint specified above, you would have sold in 2000!

    "My one has not triggered so far but it is close...... I would be holding with it on close watch at this moment in a long term portfolio".
    No you wouldn't. You would have been flicked out in 2000 - and about ten times since then. The current price is WAY below your "timeline" - even if you totally disregard all previous breaks.

    "It has been a great share to hold long term" It certainly has. Trouble is, with your "timeline" system, you would not have held it long term.

    Duncan, I have said this before, but what you have here is an idea, rather than a system. The whole thing swings from a completely arbitrary start point (Why Jan 2000? Why $6.52?) and runs up at a completely arbitrary slope (Why 20%?) This total lack of precise definition enables you to draw a "timeline" pretty much anywhere you want to.

    It is absurdly easy for you to relocate your timeline to prove/disprove anything you like. All you have to do is shift the start point.


  8. #48
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,314

    Default

    PHAEDRUS, Absolute one eyed rubbish. The lengths you go to with all the twisted facts, to prove someone wrong does you no credit. You Miss out the stop loss level to try and prove your arguement why dont you do it again, or be big enough to say you are wrong. You tried the same rubbish with TPW go back to your charts and have another go. In all fairness i would not have bought CEN at that time it was only the point where you started your long term trend. If you look at the chart CEN was on a confirmed downtrend at your start point which i definately would not buy in to. it was only to show you how close our exit signals were from your start time, not mine. I remember the lengths you went to to discredit a time line system it seems you think it steals your thunder, grow tall man dont be petty.
    I do like your charts keep them coming but dont talk rubbish. macdunk

  9. #49
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,860

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by duncan macgregor about Contact

    Now is a good time to buy. The sp for a moment dropped below TPW sp giving me a real buy signal. The market swings to high some times and to low others with the basic fundamentals unchanged. I was dead right picking trust power over cen at the time, now it looks like cen will join my portfolio. macdunk
    Look Phaedrus you may think you are so clever with your graphs and rigourous approach to buying and selling but all this charting is so yesterday. Look at the brilliant technical analysis of this deluded scotsman, you just can not argue with such an original approach as that.
    Look timelines (tm) are easy and make you millions you just have to know when to ignore them. You forgot the 10pc leeway, and he forgot I raise the line as the price exceeds 20% pa.

    So leave the man alone otherwise he might post again and no one wants that, do we?

    Disc: All in fun and sarcasm
    om mani peme hum

  10. #50
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,860

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by duncan macgregor

    PHAEDRUS, Absolute one eyed rubbish. The lengths you go to with all the twisted facts, to prove someone wrong does you no credit. You Miss out the stop loss level to try and prove your arguement why dont you do it again, or be big enough to say you are wrong. You tried the same rubbish with TPW go back to your charts and have another go. In all fairness i would not have bought CEN at that time it was only the point where you started your long term trend. If you look at the chart CEN was on a confirmed downtrend at your start point which i definately would not buy in to. it was only to show you how close our exit signals were from your start time, not mine. I remember the lengths you went to to discredit a time line system it seems you think it steals your thunder, grow tall man dont be petty.
    I do like your charts keep them coming but dont talk rubbish. macdunk
    But first remove the plank from thine own eye.
    om mani peme hum

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •