sharetrader
Page 147 of 240 FirstFirst ... 4797137143144145146147148149150151157197 ... LastLast
Results 1,461 to 1,470 of 2400
  1. #1461

  2. #1462
    Divorced from logic Hectorplains's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    684

    Default

    What put the rocket under the sp? Nearly 5% leap on the day. Genesis on the move too.

  3. #1463
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hectorplains View Post
    What put the rocket under the sp? Nearly 5% leap on the day. Genesis on the move too.
    These 2 do well in a dry year with high prices.
    The situation we have now
    Both can generate more than their needs from thermal so should be maximising profits as demand is up 3%
    roughly thermal costs say $50 but market price $180+megaprofit plus rise in profits from future contracts.
    I think craigs have cen as a buy at up to 630 so probably someway to go yet

  4. #1464
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    474

    Default

    As solar and batteries come in ,which they are doing, the spot prices get more volatile at least for a start. Contact is the big benificiary. To see it at work you only have to look at the AU markets.

  5. #1465
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    1,895

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by horus1 View Post
    As solar and batteries come in ,which they are doing, the spot prices get more volatile at least for a start. Contact is the big benificiary. To see it at work you only have to look at the AU markets.
    It always seems a pity to me that there isnt more incentive to invest in solar alone without the need for expensive and inefficient batteries.
    We are so lucky that we have hydro to store energy and solar generation would reduce the daily draw on hydro and reduce the need to burn carbon

  6. #1466
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fish View Post
    It always seems a pity to me that there isnt more incentive to invest in solar alone without the need for expensive and inefficient batteries.
    We are so lucky that we have hydro to store energy and solar generation would reduce the daily draw on hydro and reduce the need to burn carbon
    I heard somewhere that NZ's topography is not that efficient for solar. In that our land costs too much as it is used predominantly for agriculture. The vast deserts in China and Australia are more suitable habitats for solar and therefore you will never really see solar take off in NZ.

  7. #1467
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    474

    Default

    You are seeing solar starting to increase markedly. The power cos have spread a lot of disinformation about solar. There is plenty of land for it plus a large no of roofs.

  8. #1468
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by horus1 View Post
    You are seeing solar starting to increase markedly. The power cos have spread a lot of disinformation about solar. There is plenty of land for it plus a large no of roofs.
    That maybe, but its not as efficient as solar in Australia or China where there are also more direct sun hours in comparison to NZ. NZ also has other alternate forms of generation that are comparable cheaper and more environmentally friendly. Huge 1000 hectare solar farms will never eventuate here.

  9. #1469
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    474

    Default

    It is not about cost it is about customers and PRICE to customers. The real deal is to leave the networks and not pay transmission,distribution or energy prices ever again. Those that have left , and there are many, are happy they left.

  10. #1470
    Missed by that much
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    898

    Default

    As New Zealand does not have interconnection to other grids in different time zones our generation mix must take into account the daily demand profile and the intermittancy of solar and wind generation. We are already at the stage of wind generation causing our grid to reach load stability limits. Any additional solar without accompanying storage would only exacerbate that situation.

    There is a solution, but one that none of the power companies are interested in. That is Pumped Storage Hydro. For every 1 MW of PSH the country can accept a further 2 MW of intermittant generation. PSH can pump water to storage when there is an excess of intermittant geneation, and generate withit when there is a deficit.

    This thread is obviously the right place for this discussion as the two best sites for PSH are both in Contact's catchments. Lake Onslow could increase NZ's energy storage by 200% and provide 1200 MW, allowing up to a further 2400 MW of intermittant generation. This scheme would cost between $3.5 and $4 billion. The Neck between Hawea and Wanaka would only be 1/10 the size and cost around $400 million. Either of these would allow a huge increase in wind or solar and decrease the reliance on gas fired generation.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •