sharetrader
  1. #16801
    Divorced from logic Hectorplains's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    684

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pierre View Post
    Run for your lives - the sky is falling!
    Awesome rebuttal that, eh! Reduced the debate to but a cliche. Paradoxically, it's one that best applies to both PEB's share price and how the company remains an ongoing concern.

  2. #16802
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Below is a portion of someones post on a Patient Cancer Forum, I have been noticing more posts regarding the use of Cxbladder. I would not take the below as fact, just a patients experience.

    PacificEdge is the company that offers the test and they have an office in PA. They will file & appeal the insurance on your behalf and have an assistance program based on income. You will be told up front what the maximum exposure is which I think can range from $100-500 and is only due in the event the insurance company does not pay. I believe it is now covered my Medicare.


    This is another persons experience from two weeks ago.

    I'm a believer! Diagnosed with TaG1 nonmuscle-invasive end of 2012. Then several TURBTs and BCGs and Cystoscopy. Started CxBladder molecular tests June 2015 all showing 'low' scores, but May of 2016 had one 'high' CxBladder test result. Sure enough, cystoscopy indicated a single 3cm tumor recurrence.

    After TURBT and BCGs again, restarted CxBladder tests Feb. 2017 which have been very 'low' past two years. My urologist also believes in this test. A simple urine sample is certainly much easier than a cystoscopy! I'm 78.

    The mystery is that Medicare still refuses to pay for these tests, yet I am never charged by "Pacific Edge Diagnostics USA". From what I know this is a generally accurate test. It has been for me. I am continuing with the test every 4 or 5 months. So far so good. I don't think my urologist is paid for his time handling CxBladder samples. But I'm not making waves, I'm happy, if you call cancer problems happy.

  3. #16803
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    The mystery is that Medicare still refuses to pay for these tests, yet I am never charged by "Pacific Edge Diagnostics USA". From what I know this is a generally accurate test. It has been for me. I am continuing with the test every 4 or 5 months. So far so good. I don't think my urologist is paid for his time handling CxBladder samples. But I'm not making waves, I'm happy, if you call cancer problems happy.
    Mystery?

    Nothing mysterious about how PEB has attempted to commercialize CxBladder in the US with the 'cart in front of the horse' approach!

    We all know about the accounting 'sales' which proved to be non-sales, the receivables which had to be written off and of course, the tens of millions of dollars squandered on salaries etc as PEB peddled its 'Unauthorised' & 'Unapproved' test all over the freaking US!

    And resorted to 'free' tests, test programs etc etc.

    And there are those who still believe in the board and management of this company to deliver!

    Where's Kaiser btw?
    Last edited by Balance; 08-04-2019 at 09:04 AM.

  4. #16804
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Mystery?
    We all know about the accounting 'sales' which proved to be non-sales, the receivables which had to be written off and of course, the tens of millions of dollars squandered on salaries etc as PEB peddled its 'Unauthorised' & 'Unapproved' test all over the freaking US!
    Not a holder, not even interested in buying into PEB, but wow sales that turned out to be non-sales and had to be written off?! I read about this ASX company BIG and it was talking about the similar stuff, sales recorded when there was no real agreement to be sales from customers. It was in the end delisted leaving a lot of investors hopeless. Sorry, as a non-holder, I shouldn't have really given a care but it just didn't sound good at all! Maybe there have been more than that, would be interesting to find that out.

  5. #16805
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    486

    Default

    I'd love to see a timeline of the non-sales, bet it increases close to the end of the HY/FY. 'Channel Stuffing' is a common technique by those less-than-honest in the pharma/health industry.

  6. #16806
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pg0220 View Post
    Not a holder, not even interested in buying into PEB, but wow sales that turned out to be non-sales and had to be written off?! I read about this ASX company BIG and it was talking about the similar stuff, sales recorded when there was no real agreement to be sales from customers. It was in the end delisted leaving a lot of investors hopeless. Sorry, as a non-holder, I shouldn't have really given a care but it just didn't sound good at all! Maybe there have been more than that, would be interesting to find that out.
    Well, PEB was recording tests carried out in the US (under test programs, trials etc) right until 30 September 2017 as 'sales' and booking said 'sales' to receivables in their books.

    There were some of us who did NOT fall for their accounting practice as their receivables were increasing faster than their increase in sales!

    For example, sales to 31 March 2017 were reported to be $8.1m (wow! 62% increase on 2016) and receivables increased to $6.5m.

    Then, PEB changed their accounting practice in 2018 to recognize sales on a 'cash' basis under NZ IFRS 15 and had to restate their accounts :

    Sales in 2017 were reduced down to $3.2m (down 60%) and get this, receivables down to $663k (down 90% !!!!!!!!).

    Why? Because IFRS 15 requires one of the key conditions of contracts to be ENFORCEMENT between 2 parties before sales can be recognized!

    https://www.bdo.nz/getmedia/07649d5f...RS-15.pdf.aspx

    What does that say about the so-called tests PEB had been carrying out in the US?

    In some industry, it is called freebies - test samples. But not according to PEB obviously.
    Last edited by Balance; 08-04-2019 at 02:34 PM.

  7. #16807
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    190

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Well, PEB was recording tests carried out in the US (under test programs, trials etc) right until 30 September 2017 as 'sales' and booking said 'sales' to receivables in their books.

    There were some of us who did fall for their accounting practice as their receivables were increasing faster than their sales!

    For example, sales to 31 March 2017 were reported to be $8.1m (wow! 62% increase on 2016) and receivables increased to $6.5m.

    Then, PEB changed their accounting practice in 2018 to recognize sales on a 'cash' basis under NZ IFRS 15 and had to restate their accounts :

    Sales in 2017 were reduced down to $3.2m (down 60%) and get this, receivables down to $663k (down 90% !!!!!!!!).

    Why? Because IFRS 15 requires contracts to be ENFORCEMENT between 2 parties before sales can be recognized!

    https://www.bdo.nz/getmedia/07649d5f...RS-15.pdf.aspx

    What a crock of ......
    Thanks mate, holy.....very interesting, yet disgusting story. I am just so amazed that there are still people hanging onto this company with all this deceptive practice done by them.....

  8. #16808
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,589

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pg0220 View Post
    Thanks mate, holy.....very interesting, yet disgusting story. I am just so amazed that there are still people hanging onto this company with all this deceptive practice done by them.....
    You are new so you have no idea how much abuse some of us were subject to for highlighting the unsustainable and dodgy way that the receivables were piling up against the 'sales'! One poster even went as far as to accuse us of attempting to sabotage PEB (a great Kiwi story!) to benefit their competitors, or to facilitate a takeover on the cheap by them! Yet another wrote that PEB did not do 'free' tests in the US - on good authority!

    Guess the institutions and their lemon-sucking fund managers who underwrote the last 4 rights issue don't have much of a choice - they have put in too much money, so donkey deep and they have to hope the company is going to deliver. What else can they do?
    Last edited by Balance; 08-04-2019 at 12:28 PM.

  9. #16809
    always learning ... BlackPeter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default "on the edge of glory"

    Don't follow this stock anymore - but just came in an unrelated search across this fine piece of Edison analysis:

    https://www.edisoninvestmentresearch...ID=12799&LANG=

    Thought it might be interesting for long term shareholders - a memory of the good old days (2014)? Just wondering how long this edge really is?

    Just kidding - I don't.
    ----
    "Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)

  10. #16810
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Posts
    4,881

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BlackPeter View Post
    Don't follow this stock anymore - but just came in an unrelated search across this fine piece of Edison analysis:

    https://www.edisoninvestmentresearch...ID=12799&LANG=

    Thought it might be interesting for long term shareholders - a memory of the good old days (2014)? Just wondering how long this edge really is?

    Just kidding - I don't.
    Pacific Edge (PEB). We expect meaningful sales from
    Cxbladderdetect in calendar 2015 and positive cash flow for the company in
    calendar 2016.

    That aged well.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •