sharetrader
  1. #17021
    AWOL
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vacation
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Same Kaiser that PEB was waxing lyrical about as being the game changing transformative customer - until it all went quiet last year and flat like Jacinda's Kiwibuild?

    Excerpt from Sep 2016 report :

    "However, we are well advanced in our commercial progress with these organisations,
    having signed the Federal Supply Schedule and entered into contract with the VA, entered into contract with TRICARE
    and successfully completed the Kaiser Permanente User Programme. While this has taken longer than we originally anticipated
    , each one of these could result in a quantum leap in sales revenue as we bring them on board as commercial customers.”

    The quantum leap turned out to be a leap back into the abyss - fictitious sales wrote off!
    That just shows you how long it takes from getting a programme completed to getting it published, along with 2001 other contenders all trying to get their results published on 2001 other items.
    And that is just page 1.
    And published/peer reviewed it must be to be considered by others as qualifying for consideration.

    Possibly the great numbers of researchers and programmes needing validation by publication that have proliferated over recent years would account for the delay as they are all trying to get in the door at once.

    Bit like ex PEB shareholders when the time comes.

  2. #17022
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Minerbarejet View Post
    That just shows you how long it takes from getting a programme completed to getting it published, along with 2001 other contenders all trying to get their results published on 2001 other items.
    And that is just page 1.
    And published/peer reviewed it must be to be considered by others as qualifying for consideration.

    Possibly the great numbers of researchers and programmes needing validation by publication that have proliferated over recent years would account for the delay as they are all trying to get in the door at once.

    Bit like ex PEB shareholders when the time comes.
    Delays indeed but actually, only for PEB with its bumbling management & directors.

    Bunch of highly paid clowns running the company like a circus with an ever diminishing audience (shareholders) who are sick and fed up to the back teeth watching the same chimp juggling tricks of getting the audience to suck ever bigger lemons (capital raisings).
    Last edited by Balance; 25-06-2019 at 10:50 AM.

  3. #17023
    AWOL
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vacation
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    WOW
    And I dont mean World of Warcraft.

  4. #17024
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Mid of Middle_earth
    Posts
    1,024

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Delays indeed but actually, only for PEB with its bumbling management & directors.

    Bunch of highly paid clowns running the company like a circus with ever diminishing audience (shareholders) who are sick and fed up to the back teeth watching the same red-arsed monkey tricks of sucking lemons.
    By golly, you're really back and on to PEB with gusto. Good on you Balance

  5. #17025
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    415

    Default

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033563/

    This link might help investors understand the differences between FDA and LDT. And vast benefits to LDT.

  6. #17026
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5033563/

    This link might help investors understand the differences between FDA and LDT. And vast benefits to LDT.
    Useful article which glaringly shows that PEB chose the wrong path, and has no basic understanding of how the medical industry works in the States :

    Excerpt from article :

    "While CMS is in the best position to address these gaps using the existing CLIA framework, it has shown a reluctance to do so and the FDA has stepped in. Nonetheless, it is hard to believe that the tools available to the FDA are a better fit for the task. While the FDA's goals are admirable in trying to bring regulatory coherence to the genetic testing industry, the FDA is imposing an undue regulatory burden that will change the industry in a way that harms providers and patients while not addressing the greatest problems."

    Note that the article was published in 2015 !!!!! Plenty of notice to PEB that they must go the FDA way but what did the clowns do?

    PEB sought to circumvent the FDA and has paid the price. Or rather, the audience (shareholder) has been sucking lemons and paying the price.

    It's only been in recent months that we have seen only two directors put in some of their own money!!!!!!!
    Last edited by Balance; 25-06-2019 at 11:04 AM.

  7. #17027
    AWOL
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vacation
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Useful article which glaringly shows that PEB chose the wrong path, and has no basic understanding of how the medical industry works in the States :

    Excerpt from article :

    "While CMS is in the best position to address these gaps using the existing CLIA framework, it has shown a reluctance to do so and the FDA has stepped in. Nonetheless, it is hard to believe that the tools available to the FDA are a better fit for the task. While the FDA's goals are admirable in trying to bring regulatory coherence to the genetic testing industry, the FDA is imposing an undue regulatory burden that will change the industry in a way that harms providers and patients while not addressing the greatest problems."

    Note that the article was published in 2015 !!!!! Plenty of notice to PEB that they must go the FDA way but what did the clowns do?

    PEB sought to circumvent the FDA and has paid the price. Or rather, the audience (shareholder) has been sucking lemons and paying the price.

    It's only been in recent months that we have seen only two directors put in some of their own money!!!!!!!
    I would be hard pressed to call the CMS approval of a CLIA laboratory for the purposes of processing US based Triage outside of their home country as "showing reluctance."
    The FDA would still be stuffing around with stage one because any slight alteration ie same test, different algorithm would require a complete restart.

  8. #17028
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Posts
    1,073

    Default

    PEB took too long from the time their test was proven to getting to a broad market. In that time competing companies and new innovations have superceded their product. Doctors being doctors also, just cant help themselves by investing any surplus cash in further R and D. So PEB will never reap any rewards. Shareholders are really just using their funds for the good of mankind.

  9. #17029
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    415

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bottomfeeder View Post
    PEB took too long from the time their test was proven to getting to a broad market. In that time competing companies and new innovations have superceded their product. Doctors being doctors also, just cant help themselves by investing any surplus cash in further R and D. So PEB will never reap any rewards. Shareholders are really just using their funds for the good of mankind.
    bottomfeeder, please provide some evidence of another company that has 4 diagnostic tests specializing in BC. Or could you please enlighten me of these products that have superseded our product?

  10. #17030
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    bottomfeeder, please provide some evidence of another company that has 4 diagnostic tests specializing in BC. Or could you please enlighten me of these products that have superseded our product?
    Interesting!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •