sharetrader
  1. #17891
    Alley Cat Brain's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Hoagy’s Alley
    Posts
    1,055

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yoda View Post
    CxBladder test is much safer for medical staff during this Covid times, rather than close contact cystoscopy. More money can be made for a dr doing a cystoscopy, but the test might be done for social distancing? ( I think thats been covered before, but just thinking out loud)
    It depends I guess on who drives this. Insurance companies and paying patients would go for the cheapest option.
    Can doctors insist on going down the more expensive cystoscope route?
    Last edited by Brain; 13-07-2020 at 09:18 AM.

  2. #17892
    On my rounds and just a little behind..
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    272

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brain View Post
    It depends I guess on who drives this. Insurance companies and paying patients would go for the cheapest option.
    Can doctors insist on going down the more expensive cystoscope route?
    Yes, they can if the guidelines recommend cytoscopy. Urologists will do what they want, but if CxBladder makes its way into any guideline recommendation then it will really take off.
    This will be an interesting pt come August, when one would should be asking strongly how much uptake have they gathered already by Kaiser and CMS? And what the plan is to get the urologists fully on board.

  3. #17893
    AWOL
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Vacation
    Posts
    2,782

    Default

    My bet is they have 16 sales people out there, armed with the CMS approvals for Detect and Monitor and KP adoption of Triage as convincing arguments, doing the rounds of previously hesitant and or unconvinced urologists, physicians, LUGs, etc.

    On the cash side, CMS had 5600 tests done last year coming through for their approval.
    As this rate has been climbing steadily in recent years (without approval) I think that now Peb has those approvals from CMS the very least they can expect is getting 5600 tests paid for in this coming year.
    At 1000 bucks apiece $NZD 5,600,000 makes quite hole in the cashflow deficit based on the current Full Year 2020 stated throughput alone.
    Last edited by Minerbarejet; 13-07-2020 at 11:51 AM. Reason: clarity

  4. #17894
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,617

    Default

    Interesting to review what was said about a year ago :

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...ectid=12254670

    "As well as Medicare, other major bodies the firm is targeting include Johns Hopkins Medicine, veterans' healthcare groups VA and Tricare, and Kaiser Permanente. Pacific Edge reduced its US sales force to 12 last year to contain costs, but sales growth had slowed as a result, Gallaher said. The board yesterday agreed to take that up to 16, which would still leave three lower-priority regions uncovered, he noted."

    Now that Kaiser is in, guess next announcement about a deal could be Johns Hopkins, VA or Tricare.

  5. #17895

  6. #17896
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Location
    great barrier island
    Posts
    410

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    Thanks for posting that joe.Very informative

  7. #17897
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    382

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    Thanks. So at the 34 minute mark, David states the new guidelines for Triage and imaging have moved sensitivity to 97% and NPV to 99.7%.

    Not sure if these relate only to NZ guidelines as that seems to be the context in which he states these new figures.

  8. #17898
    Outside thinking.
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,563

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Carpenterjoe View Post
    Thanks for posting. A comprehensive update on PEB, its achievements and the potential ahead. Exciting.

  9. #17899

  10. #17900
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    18

    Default

    PEB has quite the competition. Some values of negative predictive values and other things mentioned in the article:

    1) Xpert Bladder cancer monitor: 93% all bladdder cancers and 97.6% high grade tumours - done in a self-contained cartridge with 90 minutes turnover.
    2) Bladder EpiCheck test: 99.3% overall and 95.1% for non-low grade Ta occurrrence - not influenced by infections.
    3) Cxbladder: 97%.
    4) ADXBLADDER-MCM5: 93%.
    5) Uromonitor-V2: 95.3%.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •