-
27-11-2014, 09:53 AM
#10361
Yup, and I was told he never made that statement.
But it is a moot point. MAde or not made, the statement relates to number of tests, not tests sold.
But we've done this to death already right?
-
27-11-2014, 09:56 AM
#10362
Originally Posted by Balance
Yes Balance me old mate
Like it or not PEB head honchos have anchored all thinking about the future around 'several tens of thousands of tests during 2014' and achieving $100m of revenues in 5 years (start/end date keeps moving)
So progress ( and commentary) will always come back back to those anchors.
I still believe that 'successful commercialisation' in PEB terms does not mean making a profit ....aim to get it used and a source of funds for the next project. They are scientists after all.
The payday for punters, if there is one, will be when the science is bought by somebody else.
-
27-11-2014, 09:59 AM
#10363
Originally Posted by winner69
Yes Balance me old mate
Like it or not PEB head honchos have anchored all thinking about the future around 'several tens of thousands of tests during 2014' and achieving $100m of revenues in 5 years (start/end date keeps moving)
So progress ( and commentary) will always come back back to those anchors.
I still believe that 'successful commercialisation' in PEB terms does not mean making a profit ....aim to get it used and a source of funds for the next project. They are scientists after all.
The payday for punters, if there is one, will be when the science is bought by somebody else.
So you don't believe they can scale this and are waiting for a saviour to bail them out?
-
27-11-2014, 10:03 AM
#10364
Originally Posted by Hancocks
Hmm, that photo of David taken yesterday and a quick assessment of his body language, facial expression and posture does NOT bode well for tomorrows news. Hopefully I'm wrong but my gut instinct says otherwise...
-
27-11-2014, 10:03 AM
#10365
Originally Posted by Balance
Exactly!!!
I would probably have sold my lot by now if CS, DD & co were anything other than "confident" in their product.
The definition of "Confident" does not equal "Guarantee".
-
27-11-2014, 10:05 AM
#10366
Originally Posted by psychic
Yup, and I was told he never made that statement.
But it is a moot point. MAde or not made, the statement relates to number of tests, not tests sold.
But we've done this to death already right?
Been around too long to fall for that BS from a company - it is significant and material enough to seek a retraction or issue a statement from the company.
Especially when it led to a price spike and the Chairman sold into that spiked price.
Question of trust, integrity and transparency.
And I AM writing as a shareholder.
-
27-11-2014, 10:08 AM
#10367
Let it go Balance.
We have no idea how many tests they may have put through under the User programmes etc
-
27-11-2014, 10:10 AM
#10368
Originally Posted by winner69
Yes Balance me old mate
Like it or not PEB head honchos have anchored all thinking about the future around 'several tens of thousands of tests during 2014' and achieving $100m of revenues in 5 years (start/end date keeps moving)
So progress ( and commentary) will always come back back to those anchors.
I still believe that 'successful commercialisation' in PEB terms does not mean making a profit ....aim to get it used and a source of funds for the next project. They are scientists after all.
The payday for punters, if there is one, will be when the science is bought by somebody else.
Let's hope you are right there and the directors also have that in mind.
I bought into 42Below on the same basis when they cracked 100,000 cases - the directors were very clear that when at that success level, someone would buy them.
A takeover happened within months.
-
27-11-2014, 10:11 AM
#10369
Originally Posted by psychic
Let it go Balance.
We have no idea how many tests they may have put through under the User programmes etc
The Chairman needs to explain.
This will not go away.
-
27-11-2014, 10:15 AM
#10370
Originally Posted by youngatheart
Hmm, that photo of David taken yesterday and a quick assessment of his body language, facial expression and posture does NOT bode well for tomorrows news. Hopefully I'm wrong but my gut instinct says otherwise...
Still reckon he should tuck his shirt in ......playboy pose not good for a leader of such an esteemed NZX listed company
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks