-
26-02-2015, 10:54 PM
#11541
-
27-02-2015, 07:52 AM
#11542
-
27-02-2015, 09:08 AM
#11543
Originally Posted by couta1
Nice clip Balance did you borrow it from the boys at Rakon by any chance? must be their theme song
Very good, haha.
Gotto hand it to those Rakon Robinson boys - nothing fazes them because of the shades they wear?
-
27-02-2015, 09:11 AM
#11544
Originally Posted by MAC
Well that's entirely a moot point as the future looks absolutely bright for Pacific Edge.
As I understand, they don’t’ provide buy or sell recommendations, they just analyse the market, crunch the numbers on valuation and sensitivity analysis, evaluate the risks and offer business information.
Not my job to speak for them, just making an observation.
Goes toward the reliability of the witness,,your honor..
-
27-02-2015, 09:21 AM
#11545
Originally Posted by skid
Goes toward the reliability of the witness,,your honor..
Same witness who reckon CRP was worth $1.89 and Snakk is worth 11c to 15c?
And no update whatsoever from Edison on CRP - good times buddies?
-
27-02-2015, 01:35 PM
#11546
Originally Posted by MAC
I’ve been advised by Pacific Edge that Edison will be their primary vehicle for providing shareholder information.
I think most shareholders and prospective shareholders do probably appreciate that effort, the cost of Edison reports, as I understand is circa $60k per throw, not something Pacific Edge have to provide, or a cost they have to incur.
Initiating Edison report here, updates available on their website
My very frank opinion to PEB is that they are better off spending the $60,000 on a good investors' communication person.
Edison has zero credibility with the institutions who are ultimately going to drive PEB's sp.
-
27-02-2015, 01:50 PM
#11547
Originally Posted by Balance
Edison has zero credibility with the institutions who are ultimately going to drive PEB's sp.
Interesting. How do you measure that?
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
-
27-02-2015, 02:27 PM
#11548
Originally Posted by BlackPeter
Interesting. How do you measure that?
You would have heard of the term 'top ranked analyst' and 'top rated stockbroking firm for research'.
Fund managers rank stockbroking firms every year by research, ideas and deal generation and trade execution as primary considerations. Depending on their rankings, stockbroking firms are then 'rewarded' with a certain level of business by the fund managers.
Edison does not figure in the rankings.
A fund manager or an analyst with a fund manager has to provide justifications to the investment committee why a stock is included in an investment portfolio - using Edison's research is not one of them!
If a top rated analyst recommend a stock, you better hope you are the first on his 'heads up' list!
Last edited by Balance; 27-02-2015 at 02:35 PM.
-
27-02-2015, 03:12 PM
#11549
Originally Posted by Balance
You would have heard of the term 'top ranked analyst' and 'top rated stockbroking firm for research'.
Fund managers rank stockbroking firms every year by research, ideas and deal generation and trade execution as primary considerations. Depending on their rankings, stockbroking firms are then 'rewarded' with a certain level of business by the fund managers.
Edison does not figure in the rankings.
A fund manager or an analyst with a fund manager has to provide justifications to the investment committee why a stock is included in an investment portfolio - using Edison's research is not one of them!
If a top rated analyst recommend a stock, you better hope you are the first on his 'heads up' list!
As an interested bystander would it be possible to learn who rates the fund managers. Presume there is Fund Manager of the year as well. Is there some overall Oracle, "She who shall be heard", overseeing these Stock Market Oscars.
-
27-02-2015, 03:23 PM
#11550
Originally Posted by Balance
You would have heard of the term 'top ranked analyst' and 'top rated stockbroking firm for research'.
Fund managers rank stockbroking firms every year by research, ideas and deal generation and trade execution as primary considerations. Depending on their rankings, stockbroking firms are then 'rewarded' with a certain level of business by the fund managers.
Edison does not figure in the rankings.
A fund manager or an analyst with a fund manager has to provide justifications to the investment committee why a stock is included in an investment portfolio - using Edison's research is not one of them!
If a top rated analyst recommend a stock, you better hope you are the first on his 'heads up' list!
Thank you - fair enough. Haven't seen enough of their reports so far to be able to assess their credibility myself (though they look professional) and noted as well that they are the largest equity research provider in the UK. How do you become the largest if your product has no value?
BTW - found a relevant link for this discussion: http://www.irmagazine.com/articles/s...uity-research/
----
"Prediction is very difficult, especially about the future" (Niels Bohr)
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks