-
08-07-2015, 12:44 PM
#12811
Member
Originally Posted by kiwidollabill
Having interacted with the senior management team of this company in the past and having some idea of the industry they work in. A retail investor shouldn't touch this with a 10 ft pole (unless you only want to be left with 6"). Nuff said.
Thanks for all your inputs so far! With your knowledge of the industry, I can't help but having an opportunistic question here—if you had to pick a biotech company for investment, which one would it be? It would also be great to hear your point of view on the “why”.
Cheers!
-
08-07-2015, 12:59 PM
#12812
-
08-07-2015, 01:02 PM
#12813
Originally Posted by blu3
Thanks for all your inputs so far! With your knowledge of the industry, I can't help but having an opportunistic question here—if you had to pick a biotech company for investment, which one would it be? It would also be great to hear your point of view on the “why”.
Cheers!
These guys reckon they specialise in bio picks.
http://www.edisoninvestmentresearch....books&field=19
Oh wait, out of all those intern Bio Stocks covered, they pick PEB?
Nutters
-
08-07-2015, 01:36 PM
#12814
Originally Posted by RGR367
You can probably start a new thread based on your question so we can leave the muddled comms here purely for PEB Seriously, I find this thread the most enjoyable one to read. And though I make it a point not to participate on a thread for which I don't own a stock, I'm making just this one exception. TY Guys and yes, keep it up. Everyone is just contributing to make it really entertaining. Thanks.
I admire your principles RGR - I too comment only on shares I either own or don't own.
-
08-07-2015, 01:53 PM
#12815
Originally Posted by snapiti
Certainly don't mind being wrong..... before one is foolish enough to to claim "this was clearly wrong" and crow about a 5% gain on a share that's has been absolutely smashed in the last 12 months, for good reasons, one should take into account that we are only 1 week into the 4-6 week period I indicated it would take to disburse the underwriters shares if they were to end up with the large amounts I was alluding too in my post(which they did)
Sit back and relax TJ........little bit to keen/early to say I told you so don't you think...........we do know the underwriter has plenty of shares to work with so only 5 more weeks to go before you can say I told you so.
But according to First, the stock has gone..
From NBR
First NZ investment banking director Dave Watt says he is comfortable with the level of shortfall within the offer and is happy
with the outcome.
“The offer was well supported by local institutions, which is a really good sign of the support the New Zealand capital markets
show for genuine New Zealand growth stories.
“Because First NZ underwrote the offer, we’re essentially responsible for the third of the shares that didn’t sell. But we had subunderwritten
them out to a broad range of existing and new institutional investors who have taken that stock.”
They happy. Insto's happy. Yappiti wrong - again
-
08-07-2015, 01:56 PM
#12816
Originally Posted by psychic
Attachment 7465
I'll try post one but dammit I suck at this.
So you really think WYN Holders would have stumped more than 65% of the full CR had WYN gone direct as PEB did huh?
You forget to reply to this yappity?
-
08-07-2015, 02:08 PM
#12817
Yes as I said just above where you quoted me snapiti, the stock has already been sold (or "dumped" if you like)..
With buy orders slowly mounting up, sells orders slowly decreasing (from the looks of it), and no underwriter to "dump" shares on the market, what would cause the stock to decrease over a 4-6 week period?
(Assuming there is no further announcements, which is a big assumption as I think [like I have mentioned before] there will be a, potentially positive, announcement regarding one of the user programmes potentially in this time frame)
Maybe another huge, unforeseen seller will come to the market and depress the price, but this seems a bit unlikely...
(on a side note, what I also found quite amusing is that immediately after the capital raising, when the shares went to 60c and 59c, some people were already congratulating snapiti that he had "got it right this time", clearly that was extremely premature as this has now completely reversed, BUT maybe it will reverse again and somehow go back down? who knows... like I've said before, its interesting times)
Last edited by trader_jackson; 08-07-2015 at 02:11 PM.
-
08-07-2015, 02:18 PM
#12818
Member
I no longer work for any company associated PEB.
I can try to add information pertaining to the company, their science and the industry they are associated with if members want to hear my insights.
Otherwise I'll contribute to other threads (I have had alot positive to say about A2 for some time....)
-
08-07-2015, 03:00 PM
#12819
Yes I also encourage anyone to post, keep it up. I also think name calling, however funny, is also a bit low...
So snapiti you are implying that local institutions, who First NZ was able to easily and very quickly sell it off to as quoted before, are all stupid for buying it? I don't think it was a case of "being desperate not to be stuck with this dog", but quite the opposite, ie NZ institutions more than happy to buy it, and First NZ, who's job really is not to hold stock, was happy to sell it to them (although would probably have to hold if the share price dropped away). The recent share price performance (increase) would also reinforce this theory...
-
08-07-2015, 03:51 PM
#12820
Junior Member
Underwriter says Pacific Edge could reach $100m sales target quickly
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks