-
12-06-2018, 08:12 PM
#16421
Spoke to an ex-executive of one of the big international pharmaceutical companies.
He was totally scathing of the accounting 'trickery' used by PEB to inflate sales (and obviously, inflate profits or in this case, lower losses) to impress the market and investors to put in ever more capital to burn.
Now that's nothing new as similar sentiments have been expressed since PEB announced the write-offs of receivables and the change in accounting policies to recognise revenues.
What is new (to me anyway) is that he said ICP Bio (blast from the past listed NZX biomed stock) also used accounting trickery to obtain capital and funding from the market - ICP Bio would record revenues from 'sale or return' product consignments to customers and in several instances, even to its partly owned overseas affiliates! History records that ICP Bio went broke and its assets were sold for scrap value.
History tells us a lot if but we care to learn.
-
12-06-2018, 08:29 PM
#16422
Originally Posted by Balance
Spoke to an ex-executive of one of the big international pharmaceutical companies.
He was totally scathing of the accounting 'trickery' used by PEB to inflate sales (and obviously, inflate profits or in this case, lower losses) to impress the market and investors to put in ever more capital to burn.
Now that's nothing new as similar sentiments have been expressed since PEB announced the write-offs of receivables and the change in accounting policies to recognise revenues.
What is new (to me anyway) is that he said ICP Bio (blast from the past listed NZX biomed stock) also used accounting trickery to obtain capital and funding from the market - ICP Bio would record revenues from 'sale or return' product consignments to customers and in several instances, even to its partly owned overseas affiliates! History records that ICP Bio went broke and its assets were sold for scrap value.
History tells us a lot if but we care to learn.
it was plain to see BEFORE they announced the writeoffs wasn't it Balance
I remember a few dedicated followers trying to tell me once that real sales were what was reported as revenues PLUS what was in trade receivables. They would have got an even biggershock how poor sales really were
“ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”
-
13-06-2018, 12:14 AM
#16423
It was one of those screaming shorts you get once every so often, I was just scared of that one solid announcement that could kill me no matter how small the chances.
|
FY15 |
FY16 |
FY17 |
1H18 |
|
|
|
|
|
PRODUCT REVENUE |
1,899 |
4,976 |
8,062 |
4,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIPTS FROM CUSTOMERS + GRANTS |
1,184 |
3,648 |
4,616 |
1,880 |
- GRANT REVENUE |
-1,110 |
-1,281 |
-1,105 |
-538 |
|
|
|
|
|
RECEIVABLES |
2,584 |
5,730 |
6,519 |
8,027 |
BAD DEBTS |
xx |
xx |
-2,635 |
-674 |
DOUBTFUL DEBTS |
xx |
xx |
-613 |
-752 |
Last edited by hardt; 13-06-2018 at 12:40 AM.
-
13-06-2018, 07:24 AM
#16424
Originally Posted by trader_jackson
How scary is this?
Forsyth Barr forecast 2017 operating revenues of $16.1m way back in October 2016.
The company reported $9.5m in May 2017 - 41% lower than forecast. Then, in May 2018, the figure was adjusted for non-sales to $4.7m - 70% less than Forbar forecast.
Share price then was 48c - so sp now should be 14c, all things being equal.
And that's not accounting for the dilutionary effect of the 2 capital raise in 2017!
Last edited by Balance; 13-06-2018 at 07:25 AM.
-
13-06-2018, 07:31 AM
#16425
Last edited by Balance; 13-06-2018 at 07:40 AM.
-
13-06-2018, 09:11 AM
#16426
https://soundcloud.com/nbr-radio/pac...-breakthroughs
Just a month away from a breakthrough with one or two of transformative customers!
-
13-06-2018, 11:00 AM
#16427
Member
Originally Posted by Balance
Spoke to an ex-executive of one of the big international pharmaceutical companies. <br>
<br>He was totally scathing of the accounting 'trickery' used by PEB to inflate sales (and obviously, inflate profits or in this case, lower losses) to impress the market and investors to put in ever more capital to burn. <br>
<br>Now that's nothing new as similar sentiments have been expressed since PEB announced the write-offs of receivables and the change in accounting policies to recognise revenues. <br>
<br>What is new (to me anyway) is that he said ICP Bio (blast from the past listed NZX biomed stock) also used accounting trickery to obtain capital and funding from the market - ICP Bio would record revenues from 'sale or return' product consignments to customers and in several instances, even to its partly owned overseas affiliates! History records that ICP Bio went broke and its assets were sold for scrap value.<br>
<br>History tells us a lot if but we care to learn.
<br><br>"If one does not learn from history, they are doomed to repeat it..."<br><br>I went into the old ICP Bio some years back. The production area is far far smaller than the the building they have. Pity they couldnt make it work, big market for NZ BSA - Proliant (and others) are the ones now capitalising on this market opportunity
-
18-06-2018, 02:48 PM
#16428
Originally Posted by kiwidollabill
<br><br>"If one does not learn from history, they are doomed to repeat it..."<br><br>I went into the old ICP Bio some years back. The production area is far far smaller than the the building they have. Pity they couldnt make it work, big market for NZ BSA - Proliant (and others) are the ones now capitalising on this market opportunity
I am intrigued about the SP increase this week
Is it ramping, misplaced optimism, conviction buying in anticipation of take over, or is good news on the horizon??
time will tell.
Disc : not a shareholder and do not intend to be one.
-
19-06-2018, 10:30 AM
#16429
PEB, " appears " to be off its recent lows !!
-
19-06-2018, 11:53 AM
#16430
Member
Is it still the dead cat bounce, or something more sustained?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks