sharetrader
Page 2124 of 2125 FirstFirst ... 11241624202420742114212021212122212321242125 LastLast
Results 21,231 to 21,240 of 21246
  1. #21231
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    217

    Default

    I'm surprised that Novitas hasn't released a decision yet, it's almost as they want to stretch the coverage.

  2. #21232
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    Nelson NZ
    Posts
    25

    Default



    On March 21, 2024, the House Energy & Commerce committee held a 3-hour hearing on the FDA's plan to regulate LDTs. Here are some resources, including a Zip file with all major documents.###The three hour session is online at YouTube here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQOYPjdTMzU(The YouTube program notes give access to an online YT auto transcript).The House home page for the hearing

  3. #21233
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    492

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roskat View Post


    [FONT="]On March 21, 2024, the House Energy & Commerce committee held a 3-hour hearing on the FDA's plan to regulate LDTs. Here are some resources, including a Zip file with all major documents.###The three hour session is online at YouTube here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sQOYPjdTMzU(The YouTube program notes give access to an online YT auto transcript).The House home page for the hearing
    [/FONT]
    Thanks - very interesting commentary from Mrs Rodgers on just how slow the FDA is. She should run for President!
    Unfortunately is sums up how dinosaurous the American systems are.

  4. #21234
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Is there any indication of how long the hearings will take to wrap up? Is there any chance that they won't be able to conclude the matter until after July 2024, in which case the LCD might not be able to move forward and would be automatically canceled after July 2024?

  5. #21235
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    964

    Default

    With both CMS and then perhaps the FDA getting in the way of commercial uptake of cxbladder, Pacific Edgecmight not be too happy with this study just released:

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...89537024001457

    We know that Cytology and cystoscopy remain the gold standard in diagnosis of bladder cancer. Cytology is highly specific but lacks sensitivity, and hence the development of tumour markers such as cxbladder.
    Well these clever fellows have used Ai to improve analysis of cytology and the results after a four year large cohort study suggest significant improvement in sensitivity, above that of Fish and Cxbladder.
    As with all these things, further studies are needed but I am really starting to think that we have missed the boat here

  6. #21236
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by psychic View Post
    With both CMS and then perhaps the FDA getting in the way of commercial uptake of cxbladder, Pacific Edgecmight not be too happy with this study just released:

    https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...89537024001457

    We know that Cytology and cystoscopy remain the gold standard in diagnosis of bladder cancer. Cytology is highly specific but lacks sensitivity, and hence the development of tumour markers such as cxbladder.
    Well these clever fellows have used Ai to improve analysis of cytology and the results after a four year large cohort study suggest significant improvement in sensitivity, above that of Fish and Cxbladder.
    As with all these things, further studies are needed but I am really starting to think that we have missed the boat here
    The AI appears to use information from a cytology and cystoscopy, which are both invasive tests. I think this test is neutral when it comes to what PEB are doing.

  7. #21237
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    964

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snigmac View Post
    The AI appears to use information from a cytology and cystoscopy, which are both invasive tests. I think this test is neutral when it comes to what PEB are doing.
    Couldn't agree less!

  8. #21238
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    217

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snigmac View Post
    The AI appears to use information from a cytology and cystoscopy, which are both invasive tests. I think this test is neutral when it comes to what PEB are doing.
    Looks like I missed that the AI used images from cytology tests only which aren't invasive. It sounds like a fair bit of work is still required re the AI power of this test though.

  9. #21239
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    485

    Default

    A lot of the commentary about the efficacy of CXB references the original test suite. The enhanced CXB tests are a step up in sensitivity and NPV / PPV. NPV on CXB+ is 100%. That said, I'm not sure how much the enhanced tests are being promoted by PEB. A lot hinges on the Novitas outcome

  10. #21240
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,456

    Default

    Latest qr test numbers holding steady but cannot read anything into this as imo PEB's future is out of its hands for now !

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •