-
19-05-2014, 04:44 PM
#6761
Originally Posted by baller18
My house officer friend is unsure if they are paid tests or not. However, given the time frame seems like must be trials.
I have also asked another friend who has worked as a gp for 5 years and has not heard of cxbladder prior to my message. He then goes on it won't be the first on the list if they are suspecting cancer.
We need to get those salespeople out there to the gp's!
He didnt happen to say what was first on the list by any chance, baller. Regardless, there are now probably five more doctors aware of cxbladders' existence thanks to your efforts.
Well done.
Just as a matter of interest, what health board is involved? Is it one of those already signed up?
-
19-05-2014, 10:17 PM
#6762
Originally Posted by Minerbarejet
He didnt happen to say what was first on the list by any chance, baller. Regardless, there are now probably five more doctors aware of cxbladders' existence thanks to your efforts.
Well done.
Just as a matter of interest, what health board is involved? Is it one of those already signed up?
Yup, auckland grafton hospital is where my friend works in. The gp works in the whitecross in northshore
-
20-05-2014, 06:27 AM
#6763
-
20-05-2014, 08:01 AM
#6764
What a thing to do to your four legged mates. Having them spend their lives sniffing buckets of pee as a lab test.
Wonder how many dogs you would need for 285000 tests annually. Be a heck of a food bill and animal rights might have something to say as well.
Better put it on paws, methinks
-
20-05-2014, 08:22 AM
#6765
Yes, I'm sure the women of the world will be very happy for trained dogs to sniff their crotches in the interest of science.
they are barking mad.....
-
20-05-2014, 12:58 PM
#6766
Junior Member
Does anybody know if there will be a trading halt when the next update comes out? if so for how long?
-
20-05-2014, 01:14 PM
#6767
Originally Posted by Minerbarejet
What a thing to do to your four legged mates. Having them spend their lives sniffing buckets of pee as a lab test.
Wonder how many dogs you would need for 285000 tests annually. Be a heck of a food bill and animal rights might have something to say as well.
Better put it on paws, methinks
Moosie is no gynecologist but he'll take a look into it.
-
20-05-2014, 03:53 PM
#6768
Member
And... we're back at a buck. Chart people, what does it all mean?
-
20-05-2014, 03:55 PM
#6769
-
20-05-2014, 04:12 PM
#6770
Originally Posted by turmeric
So is the logic here that the who ever just sold a bunch 200,000 odd is hoping to trigger stop losses and therefore by those shares back at sub $1?
This sounds like quite a risky tactic, IF no stop losses are triggered and the SP just bounces back.
Do people buy into this theory that such a tactic has just been employed here?
Or is it simply more likely someone wanting out?
This stock has had a large seller IMHO.since a month or so back.There seem to be many parcels in the 100,000 range.I think I mentioned it to Balance some weeks back on the 8th May thinking it was Masfen still selling.One thing,there are few grunty buyers.
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks