sharetrader
Page 52 of 224 FirstFirst ... 24248495051525354555662102152 ... LastLast
Results 511 to 520 of 2956

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minimoke View Post
    ... and a six month PE loss of $191M and $55m in equity. And still the tax payers are going to provide support via the Extended Deposit Guarantee.
    Well I can't keep up. Today, just a few days later, the loss is now apparently $198.6m and equity is at $47.7m. How is it the Auditors can find another $7.6m of losses over a weekend yet SCF can't keep track of it themselves. It was only back in early April they thought the loss would be $154.9m. Thats another $44m in losses that has just appeared from nowhere.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Waitakere New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,083

    Default

    Minimoke It is my opinion the extended Govt. guarantee was the lesser of two evils. Otherwise SCF would collapse before the end of the present guarantee triggering massive Govt payments to depositors.
    Possum The Cat

  3. #3
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by POSSUM THE CAT View Post
    Minimoke It is my opinion the extended Govt. guarantee was the lesser of two evils. Otherwise SCF would collapse before the end of the present guarantee triggering massive Govt payments to depositors.
    Yes, I suspect you are probably right. It looks like Treasury is taking a pragmatic appraoch and trying to minimise exposure to tax payers. It looks like they figure they are up for $849m if SCF goes belly up pre October. So how can this postion be improved - well, by seeing SCF survive past 12 October when coverage is reduced and the deposit taker levy increases. It looks like a managed exit strategy for SCF - but not one they are telling people about.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    54

    Default

    Spot on Possum, the Govt needs SCF to get pass 12 Oct 2010,given the haste in which the original Gtee was drawn up and it never envisaged covering the current sencario. I still think SCF can go under before Oct 2010 due to over 1.2b due before that date and very little prospect of any funds of that level coming in. Remember all bonds are covered except SCFHA (equity), so a lot of water yet to flow under the bridge.

  5. #5
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,051

    Default

    A few weeks in one of their announcements they said equity now stands at $256m (or something liek that)

    Today they say -

    'Total equity in South Canterbury Finance is now $206.6 million, comprising
    $158.9 million of new capital subscribed in January and February and existing
    equity of $47.7 million as at 31 December 2009. The expected capital
    contribution announced by the Company on 31 March 2010 resulting from
    Torchlight Fund's proposed subscription for convertible notes in Southbury
    Corporation Limited will further enhance South Canterbury Finance's equity by
    at least $22 million

    Wonder what the number will be next month?


    Hope for the sake of the country (ie taxpayers) and punters they don't go broke

    But it seems to me it would be better if the government took over NOW as managers and then when the much vaunted 'silver lining from the global financial crisis will be a soundly based finance sector with integrity that supports economic growth and delivers reliable returns for investors' actually happens the taxpayer can get the reward for underwriting the rsik brought on by incompetence and all that

    I'm all for that

  6. #6
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,737

    Default

    Pragmatism wins the day.

    Let's hope SCF makes the best of the lifeline and survives.

    In fact, prospers so that NZ can prosper too with more NZ owned financial institutions prepared to lend to NZers.

    And to Hubbard - no more treating SCF as your private piggy bank.

  7. #7
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,323

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    And to Hubbard - no more treating SCF as your private piggy bank.
    Of course there are two ways to tackle the private piggy bank problem.

    1/ Take the Piggy Bank off the Hubbard mantelpiece.
    2/ Remove Hubbard's need by removing his pennies!

    Perhaps both solutions will come into play?

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    paraparaumu, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    426

    Default According to Sandy Maier

    on TV1's midday news, the phones were running red hot at SCF this morning with investors rushing to invest since the new prospectus has been released. Another one for the Tui's billboard?

  9. #9
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,051

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by QOH View Post
    on TV1's midday news, the phones were running red hot at SCF this morning with investors rushing to invest since the new prospectus has been released. Another one for the Tui's billboard?
    Jeez if SCF phones are running hot then the main link to Chris Lee's in Paraparaumu must have blown up with the locals telling him to reinvest their money as well

    Maybe 1/2 billion invested with them today?

  10. #10
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,051

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Jeez if SCF phones are running hot then the main link to Chris Lee's in Paraparaumu must have blown up with the locals telling him to reinvest their money as well

    Maybe 1/2 billion invested with them today?
    Finger in the dyke seems appropriate diescription

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •