sharetrader
Page 553 of 566 FirstFirst ... 53453503543549550551552553554555556557563 ... LastLast
Results 5,521 to 5,530 of 5655
  1. #5521
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    london, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    No surprise here. I also don't see farmers changing their spending habits in the current environment.

    Farmlands and Wrightsons carparks in the Bay are still pretty quiet.

    Share price overvalued?

  2. #5522
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,891

    Default

    Even though FY guidance down from that previously given pretty solid H2 forecasted with ebitda about the same as last years…..even though H1 was down 24%

    Things must be getting better
    Last edited by winner69; 27-02-2024 at 09:17 AM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #5523
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Even though FY guidance down from that previously pretty solid H2 forecasted with ebitda about the same as last years…..even though H1 was down 24%

    Things must be getting better
    Guidance of $50m vs market consensus of $53m - so steady as she goes.

    Cancelling the interim dividend however is unexpected. Not going to be popular with the dividend income investors who have funds invested in discretionary & non discretionary brokers' accounts (eg. Craigs & Forbar).

  4. #5524
    Guru
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,718

    Default

    And not so popular with some on the board?

    "❖The PGW Board has by a majority determined PGW will reinvest capital back into growing the business by suspending the interim dividend to avoid adding debt in the face of rising interest costs"

    Tensions?
    Good or bad for the company?

  5. #5525
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kiora View Post
    And not so popular with some on the board?

    "❖The PGW Board has by a majority determined PGW will reinvest capital back into growing the business by suspending the interim dividend to avoid adding debt in the face of rising interest costs"

    Tensions?
    Good or bad for the company?
    Good for the company imo as it shows that Agria (needing dividends) is not having its way. Could explain why there's a move against the independent directors - not good!

  6. #5526
    Dilettante
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Down & out
    Posts
    5,436

    Default

    So here is the reason for the major shareholder wanting Board changes, purely motivated by their own needs, not what is best for PGW. I'm happy to be out of PGW
    "Distributions
    Given the current challenges faced in the sector and broader economy and the impacts these have had on our business, the PGW Board has determined not to pay an interim dividend. The Board considers that this is an appropriate and prudent measure to take at the present time. At a broader level the PGW Board is also assessing its ongoing dividend payout ratio given the need to strike the right balance between sustainable distributions for shareholders whilst retaining sufficient earnings in the best interests of the company to allow it to effectively execute upon its strategy.”

  7. #5527
    ShareTrader Legend bull....'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    11,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toddy View Post
    No surprise here. I also don't see farmers changing their spending habits in the current environment.

    Farmlands and Wrightsons carparks in the Bay are still pretty quiet.

    Share price overvalued?
    yea i reckon pgw and skl are both overvalued at moment
    one step ahead of the herd

  8. #5528
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    london, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,067

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bull.... View Post
    yea i reckon pgw and skl are both overvalued at moment
    Skl have an attractive balance sheet though. So I don't see the sp coming under as much pressure as PGW.

  9. #5529
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,300

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    Interesting to plug this new EBITDA guidance into the 'Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss for FY2023' and the associated cost structures.

    Consolidated Statement of Profit and Loss

    FY2024 Forecast FY2023 Actual
    Operating EBITDA $52.000m $61.194m
    less Depreciation and Amortisation Expense $28.063m $28.063m
    equals EBIT $23.937m $33.509m
    less Net Interest and Finance Costs $9.573m $9.573m
    equals Profit Before Income tax $14.364m $23.936m
    less Income Tax Expense $4.022m $6.418m
    equals Profit Net of Income Tax $10.342m $17.518m

    Now: $10.342m/75.484m= 13.7cps

    As it happens 10.0cps has already been paid out during FY2023 as the final dividend for FY2022. So to keep that balance sheet intact, the final dividend paid during FY2024 (actually the interim dividend for FY2024) should be no more that 4cps. And 4cps is only a little down on the interim dividend paid in that same time space but a year earlier of 12cps. Hey, just a minute........
    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Guidance of $50m vs market consensus of $53m - so steady as she goes.

    Cancelling the interim dividend however is unexpected. Not going to be popular with the dividend income investors who have funds invested in discretionary & non discretionary brokers' accounts (eg. Craigs & Forbar).
    You forgot to mention that late last year PGW reduced their EBITDA guidance to $52m, so $50m is a second downgrade. What did you say about downgrades coming in threes? It would come as no surprise to me if the new $50m EBITDA guidance for the FY2024 year was not met. You also have to remember that traditionally most of the profit comes in the first half. So it wouldn't surprise me if PGW only breaks even on a NPAT basis for the year.

    I was predicting an interim dividend of no more than 4c. So with rural conditions softening, it is no real surprise there is no interim dividend.

    So am I selling out? Quite the reverse. I topped up my holding this morning. Looking through the next business cycle and averaging across the dividend stream, I reckon I am going to get a 10% gross yield. That is far too tasty a prize to leave on the table. Next plan is to free up some of my bank deposit money to buy some more.

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  10. #5530
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Mid of Middle_earth
    Posts
    1,025

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    ................

    So am I selling out? Quite the reverse. I topped up my holding this morning. Looking through the next business cycle and averaging across the dividend stream, I reckon I am going to get a 10% gross yield. That is far too tasty a prize to leave on the table. Next plan is to free up some of my bank deposit money to buy some more.

    SNOOPY
    As this one has been a long book-value-negative stock already in my portfolio, I might just follow you and further increase my holding also. SP is just too tempting not to.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •