-
01-11-2023, 10:20 PM
#1731
Originally Posted by n908671
Help me get my head around this.
Is the inefficiency because of the tax losses carried over, they will not pay tax on profits until these losses are used up. Therefore there will be no imputation credits attached to the dividends so shareholders get hit the full whammy tax on the dividends.
You are on the right track.
In order to attach imputation credits, you must have paid tax / have tax paid income.
ALF is sitting on a massive pile of tax losses. Therefore, there is no tax to pay on its profit before tax, and thus can't attach imputation credits.
That doesn't stop the company from paying unimputed dividends. They are free to do so. Many do.
But the existence of those tax losses also provide a financial incentive for the company to potentially grow by acquisition, using sensible amounts of debt, as the cashflow from its operations will be quite strong (given it doesn't have to pay tax) and it can use those strong cashflows to quickly paydown any debt. I suspect that is why WAF has bought in. The nature of ALF's rural land management business is quite cashflow positive as well.
-
02-11-2023, 07:04 AM
#1732
Originally Posted by Muse
You are on the right track.
In order to attach imputation credits, you must have paid tax / have tax paid income.
ALF is sitting on a massive pile of tax losses. Therefore, there is no tax to pay on its profit before tax, and thus can't attach imputation credits.
That doesn't stop the company from paying unimputed dividends. They are free to do so. Many do.
But the existence of those tax losses also provide a financial incentive for the company to potentially grow by acquisition, using sensible amounts of debt, as the cashflow from its operations will be quite strong (given it doesn't have to pay tax) and it can use those strong cashflows to quickly paydown any debt. I suspect that is why WAF has bought in. The nature of ALF's rural land management business is quite cashflow positive as well.
The problem with companies that pay unimputed dividends, is that they have to pay the RWT amount to the IRD in cash. Effectively giving away cash for nothing. It is a losing situation in the NZ tax regime. It would be better for them to return cash via other means, like a share buy back or as Muse has pointed out, grow by acquisition. Or do what SKT did and pay back capital.
-
20-11-2023, 11:38 AM
#1733
Share price performing better after acquisitions of shares
-
21-11-2023, 09:04 PM
#1734
-
11-01-2024, 09:08 AM
#1735
It looks like the share price could breakout anytime
-
14-01-2024, 02:52 PM
#1736
My target price is 1.50 by 31.12.24
-
14-01-2024, 05:17 PM
#1737
Member
Originally Posted by WAIKEN
My target price is 1.50 by 31.12.24
Interested as to how you came up with that figure?
-
14-01-2024, 06:08 PM
#1738
EPS currently at 11.59c and it is growing average over 20% in the last a few years if it kept going $1.50 is very reasonable
-
19-01-2024, 08:43 AM
#1739
-
19-01-2024, 09:02 AM
#1740
Yes very positive in deep
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks