-
30-05-2011, 04:19 PM
#561
So hardly anybody left to do the hard work .... calling in contractors to help .... maybe the corporate undertakers would be a better bet
Betcha the tea lady has gone .... oops I forgot they couldn't afford one
What an utter disaster this whole fiasco has been
-
30-05-2011, 04:29 PM
#562
Any chance they'd get RECL in to manage the AFI assets?
-
30-05-2011, 06:06 PM
#563
Originally Posted by Lizard
Any chance they'd get RECL in to manage the AFI assets?
Yeah right !!! assets?? !
-
30-05-2011, 06:35 PM
#564
Originally Posted by percy
Yeah right !!! assets?? !
Could make life easier .... some of the assets in RECL are also encumbered to Allied Finance .... those who wanted cash went to anyone ... and they all fell over themselves to lend the money
-
05-07-2011, 04:44 PM
#565
Originally Posted by winner69
So hardly anybody left to do the hard work .... calling in contractors to help ....
Steve Morrison heard your call - he's just taken up the job as head of Allied Farmers Rural. Before you can blink, a big chunk of that job gone now the merchandising division is to be closed down.
-
03-08-2011, 04:23 PM
#566
I see the rural stores are gone. Is this the whole of the Rural Services segment of ALF? Would that mean the remaining business is now pretty much just the Asset Management business, or sell down of ex-Hanover assets?
If I was a shareholder, I would find today's announcement a little info-lite. Are they in quiet liquidation mode, and, if so, wouldn't this sale require shareholder approval under rule 9.1.1 (a)? I guess they can get away with not needing a vote under 9.1.1 (b) if the assets were sold for less than $10m?
Hard to see why anyone is paying more than NTA for shares (around 0.6cps) - I would have thought a discount would apply and a price of 0.4cps or below would be more fitting.
-
03-08-2011, 04:43 PM
#567
Hard to see why anyone is paying more than NTA for shares (around 0.6cps)
not hard at all up to 1 on the news
-
03-08-2011, 04:47 PM
#568
Originally Posted by Kees
Hard to see why anyone is paying more than NTA for shares (around 0.6cps)
not hard at all up to 1 on the news
Kees, I am genuinely interested in how you would justify 1cps?
-
03-08-2011, 04:59 PM
#569
Originally Posted by Lizard
Kees, I am genuinely interested in how you would justify 1cps?
With respect to Kees, doesn't matter what he thinks. The market has come in with a trade at 1 cent. Thats the current valuation of this stock.
-
03-08-2011, 04:59 PM
#570
Even taking the NTA at 0.6c a share seems a bit risky. NTA was 7c a year ago.... just keeps falling with the write downs on the hanover loans
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
Bookmarks