sharetrader
Page 67 of 177 FirstFirst ... 175763646566676869707177117167 ... LastLast
Results 661 to 670 of 1766
  1. #661
    Share Collector
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    ALF010 into shares .... is that another trillion shares to be issued?
    Depends on average of 20 days VWAP, although that's half in the bag at this point... and the price used is 95% of that value - calculate the number by dividing into $12.6m

    Given another 1095m shares to be issued to bonus and PAR rights holders, the market cap is effectively around $6m at 0.2cps...so the noteholders probably going to end up with a little under two-thirds of ALF. Glad the Hanover investors don't mind sharing around the $110m of net assets they are now recognised as having brought to the table...

  2. #662
    Share Collector
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    One thing I think needs to be asked here is how ALF can issue the 977m+ shares to PAR holders. They eventually end up with nearly as much of the company as Hanover investors, yet put in only $2.3m c.f. Hanover investors nearly $110m. Shareholders never got a vote on this and now won't - which appears a bit outrageous.

    Earlier, this was going to be included in a shareholder vote at the upcoming meeting, due to the 20% limit on new issues, but now it seems they have been able to bypass this, as they can include the shares from the ALF010 conversion.

    It is probably splitting hairs, given this farcical situation can only occur because the company is close to worthless. But this process does seem to have circumvented listing rules by effectively issuing shares under a placement that now equate to almost 50% of the shares that were on issue at the time of placement, yet shareholders don't get the chance to vote on this.

    Oh, and it would have to be presumed that the allocation of these unissued shares is contributing to the effective share price (theoretically one-third lower than it would be without them) and therefore the VWAP at which the ALF010's will end up converting. A "double whammy" for existing holders in the dilution.
    Last edited by Lizard; 06-11-2011 at 09:27 AM.

  3. #663
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    ALF issue of shares and dilution of some holdings sems to parallel the Zimbabwe inflation rate

  4. #664
    Share Collector
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Porirua
    Posts
    3,509

    Default

    Looks like ACC took might have taken the major part of that placement last year, as appear to have been allocated quite a few shares under the PAR rights.

  5. #665
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lizard View Post
    Looks like ACC took might have taken the major part of that placement last year, as appear to have been allocated quite a few shares under the PAR rights.
    I think we will find ACC is propping up quite a number of companies. (inc Syft, Dominion Finance, Just Water, Energy Mad, Ecoya, Whoosh, Sealegs, NZO, Pike, Abano and Methven)

  6. #666
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Liz - I haven't been able to keep up ... so how nany shares did they end up with before the consolidation .... billions or trillions or zillions

    All I know that ALF shareprice is now 5 cents ... much higher than the beginning of the year so should save my bacon in the NZX comp

  7. #667
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    389

    Default

    After consolidation at 100:1, ALF shares were traded at 6 cents each. This is equivalent to 0.006 cents before consolidation.

  8. #668
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    699

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newman View Post
    After consolidation at 100:1, ALF shares were traded at 6 cents each. This is equivalent to 0.006 cents before consolidation.
    so ALF has a market cap for 1.5 million not 150 million ?

  9. #669
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2001
    Posts
    1,981

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Newman View Post
    After consolidation at 100:1, ALF shares were traded at 6 cents each. This is equivalent to 0.006 cents before consolidation.
    Given it was 100 to 1 then the 6 cents today relates to 0.06 not 0.006 as that would be 1000 to one.
    So just before considalation it was on average .3 of a cent it has now lost 4/5 of its value since considalation. Is that correct or have i got it wrong somewhere.
    The idea of considalation from my experience is the allow further lose of value. Below .1 of a cent the company can no longer trade so consolidation is necessary to continue DOWN the slippery path.
    Are these cals as others see it??
    digger

  10. #670
    Guru Xerof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    3,005

    Default

    Yes digger, nothing wrong with your logic.

    I'm wondering why the price would collapse today in particular - surely nobody sold at these 'higher' prices without knowing there was a consolidation, but to me that seems to be what has happened, or its a couple of the bond holders getting their cash out

    with 58k of sales today, the MC has collapsed by 70% of what it was yesterday.....

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •