sharetrader
Page 5 of 143 FirstFirst 1234567891555105 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 1426
  1. #41
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Rif-Raf

    NAV just keeps creeping up $1.73/$1.37 Gap of around 25c below diluted NAV
    Well done Carmel - you're delivering
    more like 11% isn't it
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  2. #42
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    NAV 1.7515 /Diluted NAV 1.3861 A 12.7% discount reduced from 15.02% a month ago. KFL has bought a 6% stake in DGL. What do you think of DGL?

  3. #43
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    KFL
    05/07/2006
    DIVIDEND

    REL: 1003 HRS Kingfish Limited

    DIVIDEND: KFL: Special Dividend Announced

    NEWS RELEASE 5 JULY
    2006

    KINGFISH TO PAY SHAREHOLDERS SPECIAL DIVIDEND

    Listed investment company Kingfish is to pay shareholders a special dividend
    after a year of outstanding returns. Kingfish grew its net asset value by
    24% in the year to 31 March 2006.

    Announcing the special dividend at its annual shareholders meeting, Kingfish
    chairman Robert Challinor said shareholders holding shares by the record date
    of 21 July 2006, would receive a fully imputed dividend payout of 2.5 cents
    per share.

    "The board has elected and is able to pay this special dividend because
    Kingfish has received greater than expected dividend income over the past
    couple of months," Mr Challinor said. The most significant portion of this
    additional dividend income was from a special dividend declared by Waste
    Management as part of its recent amalgamation with Transpacific Industries
    Group.

    Kingfish director Carmel Fisher said the special dividend was in line with
    the Kingfish dividend policy of distributing income after deducting operating
    and management costs, including tax and financing costs.

    Ms Fisher told shareholders at the annual meeting the March 2006 year had
    been a year of impressive performance with the Kingfish portfolio yielding
    strong results despite a challenging economic climate. Net asset value rose
    24% to $1.58 per share in the year to 31 March 2006, compared with the share
    market benchmark increase of 14%. Since balance date, the Kingfish net asset
    value has increased to $1.7825 as at 30 June 2006.

    "Our performance has exceeded a buoyant share market, reflecting the growth
    prospects of the companies in our portfolio," Ms Fisher said. During the
    year, Ryman Healthcare and Mainfreight had been star performers with the
    share prices of each lifting more than 70%.

  4. #44
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by sniper

    quote:Originally posted by Paper Tiger

    quote:Originally posted by sniper

    Accidents waiting to happen - that's how I would describe some of KFL's investments and investment strategy. TUA, RBD, WHS, BGR, KID, POD etc make for a parade of uglies invested in by KFL. What else lurks in the portfolio? That's why the share will always trade at a discount.
    KFL was at the end of February invested in CTL, CVT, FRE, MFT, MHI, NZX, PPL, RYM, SOE, WAM according to the Fisher Funds Newsletter.

    So now is your chance to prove that you are more than a backward looking whinger and tell us which of these are the accidents waiting to happen and why.
    Could be NZX, could be CTL, could be SOE, could be FRE. History says that there's a strong likelihood that one or more will blow up in the next 12 months.

    Would you invest in a company when it has that kind of track record? [^]
    Did you mean blow UP, as in increase?[^]
    Treetops

  5. #45
    Legend shasta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    5,914

    Default

    Treetops, the DGL purchase intrigues me as a KFL holder.

    If they meet/beat there forecasts & the Oyster Bay type fiasco's are out the way, this could surprise in a year or two.

    Personally, i question the DGL & RAK purchases & am waiting to see what they do with the WAM money.

    The special dividend & share buyback has breathed some life into KFL recently, as its now at its 12 month high, where to from here though?

    Disc: Happy holder

  6. #46
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by shasta

    Treetops, the DGL purchase intrigues me as a KFL holder.

    If they meet/beat there forecasts & the Oyster Bay type fiasco's are out the way, this could surprise in a year or two.

    Personally, i question the DGL & RAK purchases & am waiting to see what they do with the WAM money.

    The special dividend & share buyback has breathed some life into KFL recently, as its now at its 12 month high, where to from here though?

    Disc: Happy holder
    Me too. How much they have invested in Rak and DGL I'm not sure but it will be small in KFL. Fisher funds probably has most. So far so good anyway.

    You are right Shasta. A large component of the WAM money is still not revealed. The five largest portfolio holdings at 28 June 2006 ([u]just before the WAM payout</u>) are approximately as
    follows:

    Ryman Healthcare -17.7%
    Mainfreight - 13.7%
    Waste Management - 13.5%
    Pumpkin Patch - 11.0%
    Freightways - 9.6%
    So it was 13.5% of the portfolio and a 2.5% spec. div. isn't much.
    Some will go into the buyback. I guess its time for Carmel to show how good or bad [}] she really is. It's getting to that point where really good investments are few and far between. I liked RAK and DGL as exporters and our dollar still has further to fall. Rak in particular could be a real winner. Personally I couldn't take the risk with them as individual shares, but as a small part of a managed portfolio I'm more at ease. For the larger investor with more time and expertise I'm sure buying the individual shares is better. For me I'm very satisfied with the proportion of each share in the portfolio. Which is best out of RYM FRE and MFT. MFT and FRE today!

    I would like to thank [u]D_Pick </u>for his original posting on 4/12/05 It alerted me to cash in. What the discount is now we will find out tomorrow.

    Treetops

  7. #47
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2001
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    115

    Default

    A pleasure Treetops

    KFL have had a good run. However they do have an underlying portfolio of quality stocks with good future potential and high return on equity. Which obviously has been attractive to other investors

    How they reinvest WAM monies will be interesting.

  8. #48
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    , Auckland , New Zealand.
    Posts
    337

    Default

    On another thread Treetops has been advising me to put some of my ex-WAM cash into KFL. Why would I?

    I have a lot of respect for chairman Rob Challinor and Carmel Fisher no doubt knows her job. Their policy appears to have been to invest in small to mid-cap stocks, putting growth potential ahead of dividend income. But since listing in March 2004 at $1 the company's performance has been less than spectacular. The current s p of 125 represents pretty ordinary growth over 28 months. Especially when the div yield is so modest - less than 3% until the 2.5c spec div announced yesterday boosted the potential yield to 4.88%. I'd be cheesed off if my own portfolio didn't do much better than that.

    One wonders how much get swallowed up in "operating and management costs, including tax and financing costs", to quote from yesterday's announcement. I prefer the fun of making my own decisions while avoiding those pesky "operating and management costs".

  9. #49
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    quote:Originally posted by Lawso

    On another thread Treetops has been advising me to put some of my ex-WAM cash into KFL. Why would I?

    I have a lot of respect for chairman Rob Challinor and Carmel Fisher no doubt knows her job. Their policy appears to have been to invest in small to mid-cap stocks, putting growth potential ahead of dividend income. But since listing in March 2004 at $1 the company's performance has been less than spectacular. The current s p of 125 represents pretty ordinary growth over 28 months. Especially when the div yield is so modest - less than 3% until the 2.5c spec div announced yesterday boosted the potential yield to 4.88%. I'd be cheesed off if my own portfolio didn't do much better than that.

    One wonders how much get swallowed up in "operating and management costs, including tax and financing costs", to quote from yesterday's announcement. I prefer the fun of making my own decisions while avoiding those pesky "operating and management costs".
    Lawso
    Are you not forgetting the free Warrants worth 34c and I think the shares sold at IPO for 97c.
    http://www.kingfishlimited.co.nz/200...esentation.ppt

    Anyway good things come to those with patience. I also advise GPG for diversity. I bought in at 93c early Dec05 and 102 Feb 06 and and don't have any warrants which are doing even better. If I had bought those at 14cents I would be really happy now but I still wonder about warrants. The time restrints give me the geebies and thats why I don't bet on the TAB. I'm a cautious person at heart you see and grabbed at KFL then because it had shares most of the sharetrader bloggers recommended and was at discount and had a buyback going all which I had experienced as positive. If anyone is to be praised for my "luck" it is the people like you with more experience than me that discuss things. D_Pick,PT, Macdunk, Phaedrus even Sniper! I'm on a learning curve but I know for sure I would rather be in KFL and GPG than trying to pick an individual share or three right now. It's clearly not for you and I respect that. One other reason I liked KFL was it was getting a tax break on its long term holdings CG's but I may be wrong there. The other was the prospect of a falling dollar which came much sooner than I expected but still has more room to run and it has a good export component. The management fees are linked to success and being a fair man if Carmel can make me happy I don't mind her enjoying some as well. Go Carmel! I would sooner be in KFL or GPG than a totally unregulated finance company. Don't take that literally. But it is still the wild west for them. You get my gist. The govt. needs to get its act together fast and something is coming out in Sept. Too late for many though as laws take yonks to enact. Al the best with your choices and do have fun. I agree with that.
    Treetops

  10. #50
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand
    Posts
    249

    Default

    NTA: KFL: Kingfish NAV $1.8147 at 5 July 2006 02:31pm
    KFL
    06/07/2006
    NTA

    REL: 1431 HRS Kingfish Limited

    NTA: KFL: Kingfish NAV $1.8147 at 5 July 2006

    The unaudited net asset value per ordinary share of the Company as at 5 July
    2006 was $1.8147
    [u]The unaudited diluted net asset value per ordinary share as at 5 July 2006
    was $1.4186.
    </u> This diluted net asset value describes the effect if all
    warrants in existence were exercised today at $1.00. At 30 June 2006,
    54,911,007 warrants remain to be exercised on 31 March 07 and/or 31 March
    2008.

    The net asset values per share are after the deduction of treasury stock and
    warrants acquired and subsequently cancelled under the Kingfish buyback
    announced on 26 October 2005.

    The net asset values are after including accruals for any performance fee
    payable to the Manager.

    The unaudited net asset value per ordinary share excluding performance fees
    as at 5 July 2006 was $1.8261 (fully diluted $1.4245).

    The five largest portfolio holdings at 5 July 2006 are approximately as
    follows:

    Ryman Healthcare - 17.7%
    Mainfreight - 14.8%
    Pumpkin Patch - 10.0%
    Metlifecare -10.4%
    Freightways - 9.8%

    End
    End CA:00133756 For:KFL Type:NTA Time:2006-07-06:14:31:03


    It appears to be at 1.30 at low volume but a bid of 1.32 and offer 1.35 High depth buy of 225k and 4k sell KFLWA at 35c Someone likes this share as well Lawso I would advise you have missed the boat on this one. Wait for bad news.
    At 132 they are at a 7% discount to unaudited diluted net asset value to ordinary share Perhaps we need to start a new thread. KFL Warrants or head shares? [?] Perhaps someone with knowledge on this and could help me out. [8)] [:I]

    Treetops
    At 136 a 4% disc to dil NAV unless the NAV has already risen. Quite possible! The KFL Warrants are at 36c Some sellers coming in at 135

    Looks like a good rise for the day. Note [u]CTL merger </u>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/st...ectID=10389957
    Good or bad. Does look like a lot of selling pressure. I'm sure Sniper or some FA will let me know if it's

    T

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •