sharetrader
Page 106 of 234 FirstFirst ... 65696102103104105106107108109110116156206 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,060 of 2331

Thread: RAK Rakon

  1. #1051
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    Hey biker, you out before the Robinson's faecal matter hits the proverbial fan tomorrow?
    Have just read your post Moosie. Got out this morning. made 10% in a couple of months so not unhappy, but certainly not impressed with the announcement and continued dithering over a capital restructure. Will wait for the bottom of the rights issue and have another look then. Can see a bit of shareholder pain between now and then!
    Last edited by biker; 23-05-2013 at 10:31 AM. Reason: changed month to a couple of months

  2. #1052
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,884

    Default

    whether you look at look through profit, ebita before this and that, ebit, npat or any other angle it looks like they lost money last year .... even before the impairment charge

    Hows that for a conclusion

  3. #1053
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by turmeric View Post
    Imagine the pain of those that got in back when this thing was $3 evne $5 plus!! Makes me feel better that my realised losses on this thing were only in tha magnitude of 50% but I really do feel sorry for those that believed in this company and it's management and got screwed. But we all must ultimately be accountable for our own investment decisions. What a sad sad company - worst investment I've ever made by a long long way, just so glad I've washed my hands of it now.
    Yes I'm happy to have cut my losses and put the residual money into something with more potential than a dying company. Having said that, the very negative result will offer opportunities for speculators and traders.

    As mentioned by Sparky and othes, this profit downgrade will probably make Rakon a better value takeover target for the downstream network companies, like Huawei and the like. For one; they taking over Rakon will remove the sufferage from unfavourable currency conversion, which has been one of the factors to blame for Rakon's demise.

  4. #1054
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    83

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snapiti View Post
    Biker you must understand that a rights issue is unlikely as that will force the Robinson's as major shareholders to stump up with some of thier own money.
    They will continue to try and find a strategic partner but I think you will find they have been trying to do this unsuccessfully for sometime.
    I don't understand what you are saying. Rights issues gives you the right, rather than the obligation, to buy an issuance of shares. Rakon could very well issue rights, and the Robinson's need not take part.

    However I do agree with you in thinking Rakon will not issue rights, since I don't think there is much appetite for Rakon at the moment. Share issuance really only works when a company is thriving and needs funds to grow and fund their expansion; rather than getting funds to dig them out of a hole which they may still be stuck in even with more funds.

  5. #1055
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snapiti View Post
    Biker you must understand that a rights issue is unlikely as that will force the Robinson's as major shareholders to stump up with some of thier own money.
    They will continue to try and find a strategic partner but I think you will find they have been trying to do this unsuccessfully for sometime.
    I agree with the Robinson issue and hear there may be division within the family, hence the dithering, however I wouldn't discount entirely the possibility eventually of a deeply discounted rights issue. I guess what I'm saying is I will wait for the complete shakeout, see what results and have another look then. In the meantime I'm staying well clear.
    Last edited by biker; 23-05-2013 at 10:41 AM. Reason: layout

  6. #1056
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    Good on ya mate, at least someone is making money from the Robinson's stupidity. Going to catch the falling knife again?
    Answered in my previous post. These Robinson's do indeed seem to be a bunch of Turkeys. When I bought in I was prepared to give them the benefit of the doubt, having heard there may have been some positive management changes.
    No sign of that with this announcement!
    Last edited by biker; 23-05-2013 at 10:47 AM. Reason: typo

  7. #1057
    老外
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    1,000

    Default

    Just reading the report now... 4 hours behind in China!

    Volume of goods sold up a massive 73%. That's big numbers!
    Loss of 32 million. My god....
    Debt skyrocketing, virtually all monetary reserves gone.
    Hedging looks like it is (finally) under control.

    "deletion of the requirement for an independent valuer to conduct the valuation of investment property and property, plant and equipment;"

    Whaaaaaaattt??? The part that all shareholders should be interested in and ... nope, we aren't going to do it. Can they actually do that? Clearly this is an admission that their Assets are way over valued and that they don't want someone to come in and tell them the real value as it would affect their balance sheet poorly. Which makes you ask why? Could it be that they want to keep the Asset value high due to the chance of a takeover and therefore an offering above the worth of the company? Or could it be that they want to keep it high so that there is LESS chance of a takeover due to obviously overstated Assets?

    This company is imploding/imploded. Under current management, there is absolutely no way that anything can get any better. If you still hold their stock, RUN FOR THE HILLS!

  8. #1058
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,884

    Default

    C'mon fess up, who made this comment on the NBR website

    Rakon, once the tech market darling. Wind the tape forward five years from now and contemplate today's tech darlings - Xero, Diligent, SLI systems, Wynard, Aria, et al
    And the lesson is, easy come, easy go.

  9. #1059
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    chch, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    2,494

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by moosie_900 View Post
    Amen brother. Hold a stock and on a long enough timeline it will go to zero
    Only if you hold the wrong type of stock

  10. #1060
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Pourquoi?
    Posts
    873

    Default

    Run. Run very fast away.

    They are trying to win a war with the Japanese/koreans/taiwan/china in electronics manufacturing with no point of difference.

    Result is a huge cash burner that will be out of business in 2 yrs on present course.

    Hard to win against these guys.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •