sharetrader
Page 917 of 1418 FirstFirst ... 41781786790791391491591691791891992092192796710171417 ... LastLast
Results 9,161 to 9,170 of 14173
  1. #9161
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    850

    Default

    Selling at 17.9 on average and buying at 17

    Been taking kiltearns share off em.

  2. #9162
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    850

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Ah you beat me to it!

    ACC see value in the long term play...good endorsement for an entity that already has a lot of skin in the game to double down on their investment...
    They are also pro takeover right

  3. #9163
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Posts
    2,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Ah you beat me to it!

    ACC see value in the long term play...good endorsement for an entity that already has a lot of skin in the game to double down on their investment...
    Indeed - I view ACC investment moves as better "market commentary" than most analyst notes.

  4. #9164
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimdog31 View Post
    They are also pro takeover right
    ACC are patient, long term value-oriented investors.

    They would take a pragmatic view to assessing any 'transaction' that is presented (be it takeover, merger, JV or anything else).

    I hope ACC buy more.

  5. #9165
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,922

    Default

    I bet Ogg's heart skipped a beat when he saw there was a SKT announcement...

    Christ he must have felt deflated when it was just about ACC buying a few more shares!

  6. #9166
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ogg View Post
    I couldn't think of anything more lame then holding this stock long term.
    To be fair, I think you would consider holding ANY stock long term as "lame".

  7. #9167
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,886

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    ACC are patient, long term value-oriented investors.

    They would take a pragmatic view to assessing any 'transaction' that is presented (be it takeover, merger, JV or anything else).

    I hope ACC buy more.
    In love with ACC are we

    They hold some of almost every stock on the NZX ….got to do something with the levies eh.


    SKT is 0.4% of their NZ investments ….could say they are ‘overweight’ SKY …that’s good but probably a legacy issue.

    Wouldn’t read anything into ACC % increasing …as I said got to do something with the levies.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  8. #9168
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,922

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    I ….got to do something with the levies eh.
    Yes, true...although they wouldn't be putting more of those levies into Sky if they thought the business would be bankrupt in 5 years (which is what Mr Market thinks, given the current quoted value).

  9. #9169
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bolivia.
    Posts
    4,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    In love with ACC are we

    They hold some of almost every stock on the NZX ….got to do something with the levies eh.


    SKT is 0.4% of their NZ investments ….could say they are ‘overweight’ SKY …that’s good but probably a legacy issue.

    Wouldn’t read anything into ACC % increasing …as I said got to do something with the levies.
    Given that SKT market cap is $288m, and NZ Main Board is $186B, then Sky is approx 0.15490127% of the NZX market Cap.

    So ACC is indeed over-weight....

    Hold on, I have to go.....there is a train coming!

  10. #9170
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,922

    Default

    2Degrees full steam ahead for IPO before the year is out.

    $1.6B they reckon! For a business with far less FCF than Sky, yet much more positive sentiment towards it.

    I like the Sky UK model better anyway. They purchased a broadband service from Telefonica initially in 2013. Three years later they launched Sky Mobile as a MVNO utilising O2's infrastructure. Seems to have worked out for them pretty damn nicely.

    Now gee whizz, how on earth might Sky Network Television achieve this exact same outcome? Hmmmmn, anyone?

    Oh yes, that's right! Merge with Vocus.

    Hey presto! Sky have a broadband network!
    Hey presto! Sky can offer mobile as a MVNO using Spark's infrastructure.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •