sharetrader
  1. #12131
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    And the takeover and M&A scenario which will play out - sooner or later.
    I was reflecting more on the general negative sentiment from the likes of Arie Dekker etc in the NBR article...

    A few things stand out.

    First, it is baffling that they continue to refuse to give Sky much credit for incredible progress. Sky currently have ~1M customer relationships which is far more than they ever had during their monopoly days. That is astounding given there is so much more competition these days and highlights that there is a huge demand for Sky TV's services (particularly streaming which is seeing double digit growth year on year). Then there is the fact that Sky continue to be able to sign deals with premium content owners. So clearly there is a demand from the owners of content to use Sky's services rather than launch their own OTT service in an already crowded market. At any point these guys could not renew their deal with Sky and enter the market with their own app - but the vast majority don't (and never will imo).
    Revenue is increasing, Sky has launched complimentary services (broadband and there is scope for mobile in the future). Earnings and cash flows seem to have stabilised despite inflation in rights costs.

    Second, they keep saying how doomed Sky is as a content aggregator (a sentiment I clearly do not share) but then when it is suggested that Sky do something big to secure their future by branching out into something like a merger with a telco, then they immediately poo-poo the idea with very questionable rationale. So according to the Arie's of the world Sky TV is doomed to extinction in its current state but shouldn't be able to transform into a business that owns hard telco assets.

    So what should Sky do instead then? Well, Arie and the others never state what the solution is. I guess they think there is no solution and Sky just needs to go bankrupt even though all the evidence we observe does not support this conclusion.

    It will be very hard for Sky to get a fair valuation on the public markets given the state of sentiment. Ultimately, I do believe Sky needs to continue on the path they are on (in terms of making improvements and progress) with a view to sell the business. That sale could be to someone like 2D or it could be to Private Equity. Either way, I think Sky will have a better time focussing on the business as a private enterprise.
    Last edited by mistaTea; 24-03-2022 at 11:51 AM. Reason: clarification

  2. #12132
    Investor
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    5,648

    Default

    Bolly bands getting squeezed for a break out to $3....

  3. #12133
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sb9 View Post
    Bolly bands getting squeezed for a break out to $3....
    Stop saying "Sky" and "three dollars" in the same sentence.

    You know it makes me horny.

  4. #12134
    Investor
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    5,648

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Stop saying "Sky" and "three dollars" in the same sentence.

    You know it makes me horny.
    Haha, we're surely on the move now, trading depth fully loaded...

  5. #12135
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    221

    Default

    Sky will get to $3.2 by June 2022.

  6. #12136
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,956

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by snigmac View Post
    Sky will get to $3.2 by June 2022.
    I need Stallion to verify this...

  7. #12137
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2021
    Location
    Christchurch
    Posts
    221

    Default

    I'll add that, in my opinion Sky will get to $3.2 by June, without a merger of acquisition

  8. #12138
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    107

    Default

    $2.80 as of now, getting there!

  9. #12139
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    1,267

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    I need Stallion to verify this...
    I will start off by saying that technical analysis isn't overly reliable at predicting exactly how far a move will go, especially when there is very little resistance. TA is however reliable (when used correctly) at identifying higher probability and good risk/reward setups, then helping time an exit.

    Assuming we have a monthly bullflag on our hands here, then using the measure rule we would expect to $3.40-$3.50 as a price target before further monthly consolidation. I also look to previous price support/resistance areas to look for consolidation. There is no notable resistance up until the $3.80-$4 area as the price fell through there so quickly. This does not mean a new resistance won't be formed in this area - maybe a psychological level like $3.00 or $3.50.

    Ultimately though I am not trading this stock and have just tucked away a maximum portfolio position. I only check in on the chart to ensure there are no TA red flags. Only thing required to make money here is patience.

  10. #12140
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,743

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sb9 View Post
    Bolly bands getting squeezed for a break out to $3....
    Sounds like a bondage session
    50 shades of Blue........sky

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •