sharetrader
Page 228 of 1418 FirstFirst ... 1281782182242252262272282292302312322382783287281228 ... LastLast
Results 2,271 to 2,280 of 14173
  1. #2271
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,930

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Reason why it is a 2.83 : 1 rights issue is because the underwriters are only prepared to back the deal on such a basis. It’s pointing a gun to the head of existing shareholders.
    Agreed, they have essentially forced existing retail shareholders to participate by going 1 : 2.83.

    You can apply for up to 20% more than your allotment too. So wealthy shareholders who take up their allotment and then some will probably end up doing very well out of this, whereas the shareholders with limited means that are unable to participate will do terribly.

  2. #2272
    Legend Balance's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    21,636

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    Agreed, they have essentially forced existing retail shareholders to participate by going 1 : 2.83.

    You can apply for up to 20% more than your allotment too. So wealthy shareholders who take up their allotment and then some will probably end up doing very well out of this, whereas the shareholders with limited means that are unable to participate will do terribly.
    Yup - like the punters who piled in the last few weeks.

  3. #2273
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    681

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Certainly nothing to indicate positive news pushing the sp up!

    Lol how about the sudden distribution over the last 12 days .

    NZX is a bit of a joke of an exchange isn’t it . Yeah sure no one knew about the capital raising at sub 20c and that had nothing to do with the heavy distribution of shares!!!

  4. #2274
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Balance View Post
    Reason why it is a 2.83 : 1 rights issue is because the underwriters are only prepared to back the deal on such a basis. It’s pointing a gun to the head of existing shareholders.
    I think its disgraceful and disrespectful to existing shareholders. Not everyone can write a cheque for the required amount. Institutions are basically giving the middle finger to this issue, the size of the placement redefines the meaning of the word pathetic.

    The systemic problem I see is that management think live sport is the panacea for all their woes. Oh wait...now its broadband. They literally seem to have no idea that many people subscribe to watch anything else but sport on Sky. Disc: Sky subscriber without sport. (watching vastly overpaid, spoiled and idolized athletes chasing silly balls around is a hugely overrated form of entertainment in my opinion. Who cares who wins, what does it really matter....).
    Last edited by Beagle; 21-05-2020 at 03:43 PM.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  5. #2275
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Have I understood this correctly .... if I had a 100 shares, I can apply for 283 additional shares? and if successful I'll end up with 383 shares?

  6. #2276
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theace View Post
    Have I understood this correctly .... if I had a 100 shares, I can apply for 283 additional shares? and if successful I'll end up with 383 shares?
    Yep ...but you need to send them $34 as well.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  7. #2277
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    1,778

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by theace View Post
    Have I understood this correctly .... if I had a 100 shares, I can apply for 283 additional shares? and if successful I'll end up with 383 shares?
    Technically you can apply for 339 shares and pay them $41. Might only get 283 though and a $7 refund.

  8. #2278
    Advanced Member airedale's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Above the high tide mark.
    Posts
    1,509

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flyer View Post
    I own 61000 shares, does this mean at 2.83/1 I can get 172630 new shares for 12c = $20715.60c

    Add to what my existing worth is ($20130) so $40845.60/233630 = $0.174c per share in theory after the new raising.

    Is this correct?
    The thing that I take from this fund raising, leaving aside any consideration of earlier buys, is that this is fully underwritten at 12 cents. So somebody {instos, fund managers, professionals etc.} is willing to take a punt at that price. So if the price gets to .174 cents again you will be back in profit. 12 cents to 18 cents, will it make 50%.? after the fund raising. I think so, you pays your money and takes a chance.

  9. #2279
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,896

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by airedale View Post
    The thing that I take from this fund raising, leaving aside any consideration of earlier buys, is that this is fully underwritten at 12 cents. So somebody {instos, fund managers, professionals etc.} is willing to take a punt at that price. So if the price gets to .174 cents again you will be back in profit. 12 cents to 18 cents, will it make 50%.? after the fund raising. I think so, you pays your money and takes a chance.
    Like the the use of the term fund raising .....like a charity need some cash to stay afloat.
    Last edited by winner69; 21-05-2020 at 07:24 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  10. #2280
    Senior Member moimoi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2000
    Posts
    549

    Default

    Well done to the contrarian buyers of the bonds over the past couple of months.

    They look to have a better chance of being made whole now via the wipe-out of the equity.

    GLTA.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •