sharetrader
Page 618 of 1418 FirstFirst ... 1185185686086146156166176186196206216226286687181118 ... LastLast
Results 6,171 to 6,180 of 14174
  1. #6171
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kerikeri
    Posts
    2,500

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mistaTea View Post
    No rain fade for me on my sweet Sky Sport NOW sub that I got an annual pass for - $299 at the time.

    Just an awesome user experience and an entertaining rugby match.
    I presume you mean the Hawkes Bay v Wellington game ?
    Agree...wasn't it great.

  2. #6172
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,914

    Default

    SKY need to get rid of Justin Marshall from their rugby coverage

    Must be costing them subscribers every time he opens his mouth
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #6173
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,951

    Default

    https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/...76RYQVMRHUY2Y/

    Sky entering broadband at the right time - usage forecast to spike to 1 gig per month for the average household.

    Consumers will want faster speeds at better prices.

    Hopefully using Feenix Communications as their partner proves to be a capital efficient way to enter the market. Entertainment and Sports bundles can be offered to existing satellite subs at very attractive bundle prices. And that will just be the beginning.

    I don't want a satellite sub because I live in a new development area that only has fibre as an option - this suburb is made for streaming. But once Sky release their streaming-internet bundles, I will almost certainly switch over if the pricing makes sense.

    A surprising thing about my area - there are a lot more satellite dishes on rooves than I would have predicted. When I go for walks, I like to look at the other properties, and as I do I try to see if there is a dish on the roof (making it highly likey they subscribe to Sky). As I say, this is a fibre-only area - so we are really set up for streaming. And even those who want traditional Sky channels could get it cheaper by streaming them via Vodafone TV.

    On average, I reckon at least 1 in 4 houses have satellite dishes. I think that is incredible for an area like this, and shows just how 'sticky' traditional Sky TV offerings are with a lot of consumers.

    The loyal, half a million strong satellite base has got to be one of the most undervalued assets in New Zealand.
    Last edited by mistaTea; 09-11-2020 at 01:48 PM.

  4. #6174
    Member Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    444

    Default

    https://itbrief.co.nz/story/new-zeal...ruption-report

    Article a few days old but just a reminder of how interesting things will/could be with Sky entering broadband/ and mobile.

  5. #6175
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    101

    Default

    OK, i'll bite. The whole broadband market is extremely competitive at the moment but its about to get turned on its head in the rural areas of NZ by Starlink: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoe...h=d8754941bb06 - NZ is in their sights and some believe they have ground stations planned here: https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesm...nk-new-zealand + https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/co...n_new_zealand/

    The latency of Starlink is actually theoretically going to be less than Fibre due to the sheer number of satellites they're putting up there - but it looks like it is not going to be too expensive either: https://arstechnica.com/information-...-500-up-front/ - $500 setup, $99 USD / month. That is obviously steep for metro areas, but if you're in a hard to reach part of the country / world that is a steal.

    I cannot see how Sky is going to make any money selling broadband honestly, even if they are reselling via Feenix as a virtual ISP. Margins are going to continue to get squeezed as a result of these new entrants and more consolidation will come to the NZ & global broadband market in the near future. Once again, I think its a case of too little to late for Sky here.

  6. #6176
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Posts
    122

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiGekko View Post
    OK, i'll bite. The whole broadband market is extremely competitive at the moment but its about to get turned on its head in the rural areas of NZ by Starlink: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoe...h=d8754941bb06 - NZ is in their sights and some believe they have ground stations planned here: https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesm...nk-new-zealand + https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/co...n_new_zealand/

    The latency of Starlink is actually theoretically going to be less than Fibre due to the sheer number of satellites they're putting up there - but it looks like it is not going to be too expensive either: https://arstechnica.com/information-...-500-up-front/ - $500 setup, $99 USD / month. That is obviously steep for metro areas, but if you're in a hard to reach part of the country / world that is a steal.

    I cannot see how Sky is going to make any money selling broadband honestly, even if they are reselling via Feenix as a virtual ISP. Margins are going to continue to get squeezed as a result of these new entrants and more consolidation will come to the NZ & global broadband market in the near future. Once again, I think its a case of too little to late for Sky here.
    It's not just about broadband, its the packages that Sky can upsell to the already 900k customers. Broadband is just a small added bonus.

  7. #6177
    Member Alpha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2020
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    444

    Default

    I thought we had already decided that it was not about them making money off the broadband piece but more about retaining existing customers. If it also allows them to win a few more by offering Sky great.
    Last edited by Alpha; 09-11-2020 at 03:41 PM.

  8. #6178
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpha View Post
    I thought we had already decided that it was not about them making money off the broadband piece but more about retaining existing customers. If it also allows them to win a few more by offering Sky great.
    Yes, those who still lament the profitability of the broadband component completely miss the point.

  9. #6179
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,951

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KiwiGekko View Post
    OK, i'll bite. The whole broadband market is extremely competitive at the moment but its about to get turned on its head in the rural areas of NZ by Starlink: https://www.forbes.com/sites/johnkoe...h=d8754941bb06 - NZ is in their sights and some believe they have ground stations planned here: https://www.tesmanian.com/blogs/tesm...nk-new-zealand + https://www.reddit.com/r/Starlink/co...n_new_zealand/

    The latency of Starlink is actually theoretically going to be less than Fibre due to the sheer number of satellites they're putting up there - but it looks like it is not going to be too expensive either: https://arstechnica.com/information-...-500-up-front/ - $500 setup, $99 USD / month. That is obviously steep for metro areas, but if you're in a hard to reach part of the country / world that is a steal.

    I cannot see how Sky is going to make any money selling broadband honestly, even if they are reselling via Feenix as a virtual ISP. Margins are going to continue to get squeezed as a result of these new entrants and more consolidation will come to the NZ & global broadband market in the near future. Once again, I think its a case of too little to late for Sky here.
    Investors still say that Chorus is worth over $4B. I would think that Chorus shares would be going down significantly if what you are saying (imminent mass exodus from fibre to internet via satellite) is a given.

  10. #6180
    Guru
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Posts
    3,951

    Default

    Saw some articles describing the ‘Biden Bounce’ in a number of share markets, including our own.

    Decided to take a peek at the Sky SP - and we are DOWN 1.34%.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA.

    Christ I almost wet myself!

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •