sharetrader
Page 23 of 846 FirstFirst ... 131920212223242526273373123523 ... LastLast
Results 221 to 230 of 8453
  1. #221
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    Hey Dsurf, are you a DPC shareholder?

    I must admit, I got this one wrong. Should have seen the writing on the wall when Bridgecorp was in trouble. Thank God I only hold a small amount.

    Anyone has a valuation on their assets?

    Yeah, I have..well... sort of.
    Having referred to the FYR report March 07 booklet many times lately I have put in a place where I can access it easily for reference..I have now misplaced it!!!........but from memory the NTA then was somewhere around the $1.87 to 1.92 mark..since then with the new accounting rules (from NZ GAAP to NZ IFRS) the NTA was revised downwards by $5.4M (15cents/s) to $1.72 or there abouts.
    Lately DB has a DPC NTA/s of $1.67 on their website.

    With the latest announcement 29 Nov 07.The report says that the Total Equity $64.362M up from $54.495M last year.

    Note the new wording TE not NTA
    Last year there were less shares on issue... so..

    As of 29 Nov $64.362M TE / 36.299M shares on issue = $1.77/share

    I have no idea how close this is to being accurate as I don't know what TE is comprised of .
    I need a lot of time (which I haven't got) to sort out the facts from this complex maze of figures (as to date I can't find the latest detailed version). Why do they make it so complicated is beyond me.

    If my figures are accurate, it shows that there has been no asset burning so far.

    Hope this helps somewhat.
    Last edited by Hoop; 09-12-2007 at 02:09 PM.

  2. #222
    Guru Dr_Who's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,045

    Default

    If the NTA is only $1.77, so why did Bridgecorp, STL, VIK and HG pay well over $2.00 for it?
    Having got ourselves into a debt-induced economic crisis, the only permanent way out is to reduce the debt – either directly by abolishing large slabs of it, or indirectly by inflating it away.

  3. #223
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    london, , United Kingdom.
    Posts
    1,135

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    If the NTA is only $1.77, so why did Bridgecorp, STL, VIK and HG pay well over $2.00 for it?
    Dr, Who knows what kind of back hander deals went on during those P party's on the million dollar boats and in the million dollar houses in Auckland.

    Its best just not to ask the question and stay away from the 'shady' companies. And I managed to say all of that without mentioning that Marc character also.

    Party at Ridges house tonight to celebrate Brent Todd avoiding the lock up.
    Toddy

  4. #224
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    38,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Toddy View Post

    Party at Ridges house tonight to celebrate Brent Todd avoiding the lock up.
    but Brent will be down at Cowboy doing his bouncing job .......... he's allowed to do that as clean mats cars during the day ..... suppose that Mat has to go down to bring him home or is brent allowed to drive home

  5. #225
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    Hey Dsurf, are you a DPC shareholder?

    I must admit, I got this one wrong. Should have seen the writing on the wall when Bridgecorp was in trouble. Thank God I only hold a small amount.

    Anyone has a valuation on their assets?
    I have been a couple of times in the past " lost the faith " after the 2006 AGM when the new CEO outlined a new strategy of rebalancing the loan portfolio away from motor vehicles - it turned out after questioning from a shareholder that all they had done was not re-invest the money.

    then there was the Rod Petrovich vs the board spat - very unprofessional - was obvious that there was no alignment of shareholder & management / board interests. Also obvious it was a "jobs for boys club with little controls"

    Then there was the clincher - the backward D new logo

    Do not hold currently - will not until the management are replaced!

  6. #226
    Guru
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Hamilton New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,251

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    If the NTA is only $1.77, so why did Bridgecorp, STL, VIK and HG pay well over $2.00 for it?
    ???
    ??? hmmmm...OK.. Answer ..probably for the same reason that investors want to buy FBU shares for 1161 cents when the NTA/s is 334cents
    Last edited by Hoop; 10-12-2007 at 10:49 AM.

  7. #227
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    This time last year VIK paid over $2.00 for DPC and now they are selling DPC at 84 cents... ROFL! What a laugh! So who still owns VIK shares?

    disc: DPC shareholder
    I wonder what St Lawrence paid. Funny how they are having a rights issue - must be short of cash. If the rights are not taken up maybe they will join VIK & be a seller also!!!

  8. #228
    Senior Member Nitaa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    937

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    This time last year VIK paid over $2.00 for DPC and now they are selling DPC at 84 cents... ROFL! What a laugh! So who still owns VIK shares?

    disc: DPC shareholder
    and maybe B King will come in and buy DPC with his own money at 60cps rather than the calamity of errors with Viking

  9. #229
    Guru Dr_Who's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,045

    Default

    Hey guys, DPC at these levels you are getting over 10% div! In the half yr announcement the board confirms Full yr profit of $6 m, so div should be around 8-9 cps.

    Also interesting to see one of the directors slowly accummulation more shares on the market.

    disc: Shareholder
    Having got ourselves into a debt-induced economic crisis, the only permanent way out is to reduce the debt – either directly by abolishing large slabs of it, or indirectly by inflating it away.

  10. #230
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Auckland, New Zealand.
    Posts
    256

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr_Who View Post
    Hey guys, DPC at these levels you are getting over 10% div! In the half yr announcement the board confirms Full yr profit of $6 m, so div should be around 8-9 cps.
    A net profit after tax of $6 million would be earnings of 16.5c per share, so a 9c dividend would be a relatively modest payout ratio of 55%. So it's possible that they could pitch the dividend even higher than that.

    Assuming a 9c dividend, they would be yielding 10.8% net, or over 15% gross at their current price of 83c.

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •