sharetrader
Page 275 of 840 FirstFirst ... 175225265271272273274275276277278279285325375775 ... LastLast
Results 2,741 to 2,750 of 8393
  1. #2741
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by janner View Post
    However.. It is not his money paying the bill..
    Hasn't stopped him getting into big trouble though has it lol
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  2. #2742
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    Classic...……………………………...lol.

  3. #2743
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Eastern BoP..
    Posts
    1,808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Hasn't stopped him getting into big trouble though has it lol
    Should that be a reason for mirth ???.

    But.. That is a little off topic.

  4. #2744
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Back on topic. History shows that the bond conversion period coincides with a low period in the SP and it rebounds later. I am going to run with that and complete my bond conversion option paperwork with full share conversion election and put it in the letterbox quickly before I change my mind. (This bob each way thing has possibly got a little out of hand and we need some push back and decisiveness)
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  5. #2745
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,852

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beagle View Post
    Back on topic. History shows that the bond conversion period coincides with a low period in the SP and it rebounds later. I am going to run with that and complete my bond conversion option paperwork with full share conversion election and put it in the letterbox quickly before I change my mind. (This bob each way thing has possibly got a little out of hand and we need some push back and decisiveness)
    Probably left it too late knowing NZ Post

    But then fate might make the right decision for you
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #2746
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Probably left it too late knowing NZ Post

    But then fate might make the right decision for you
    LOL yeah I probably have played Russian roulette with the post...bit like having a bob each way I suppose
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

  7. #2747
    percy
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    christchurch
    Posts
    17,240

    Default

    Reading the last few posts I find them funny as a play...….lol.


    All the time Turners are improving their business.

  8. #2748
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,730

    Default

    Wasn't Beagle talking about Quantum Physics just then , im a bit confused

  9. #2749
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,283

    Default Result FY2018 Revisited

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    I am not going through the full Buffett analysis for FY2018. The key sticking point is the far from stellar (based on a 15% target) return on equity over many years.

    FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018
    NPAT (Turners Limited) (A) $3.823m $12.210m $15.332m $16.789m $21.696m (e)
    Shareholder Equity (Turners Auctions :TUA) $13.378mm
    Shareholder Equity (Dorchester Pacific: DPC) $74.052m
    Shareholder Equity (Turners Limited: TNR) $121.002m $129.812m $171.716m $214.323m
    Total Combined Shareholder Equity (B) $92.430m $121.002m $129.812m $171.716m $214.323m
    Return On Equity (A)/(B) 4.1% 10.1% 11.8% 9.8% 10.1%

    (e) Profit for FY2018 assumed to be as declared in first FY2018 profit release statement. In past years the headline declared figure has required significant normalisation corrections once the detailed results are published.

    If we remember that the bare ROE figure for FY2017 was distorted because of the capital raising during that year, unfortunately ROE is going backwards, away from our 15% target. Granted I believe that 10.1% is still above the company's cost of capital, but perhaps not by much. The problem is if your return on equity is only just above your cost of capital the company becomes more vulnerable (to ongoing changes in the loan/car market in this instance). It then becomes plausible that return on equity could drop below the cost of capital. And this means the company could start destroying shareholder value, should the business cycle turn. So Warren Buffett would almost certainly not invest in this company. But that doesn't mean TRA isn't a satisfactory investment, using other investment criteria and different expectations.
    I make a point of not taking any Turners result at face value. It seems inevitable that once you delve into the results something comes out a bit smelly. And so it has proved with the FY2018 result. The key to 'cleaning out the garbage' is once again found under note 7 (the detail of the 'Profit Before Tax', and in particular the section marked 'Other Income'..

    There you will find a very significant figure of $2.664m which is a 'Fair Value Gain on Contingent Consideration.'

    Say what??? If there is a heading you can't understand, it often pays to look under the general heading of 'insurance' for further clarification. That took the nose of this hound to p76, and the heading 'Insurance Contracts' threw up the following detail.

    Change in Discount rate 3.08% to 2.61% (Insurance Contracts) -$0.120m
    Difference between Actual and Assumed Experience (Insurance Contracts) $2.491m
    Difference between Actual and Assumed Experience (Life Investments) $0.294m
    Total $2.665m

    Within the bounds of the third decimal place rounding error, this is in agreement with the $2.664m which is a 'Fair Value Gain on Contingent Consideration.' I don't think this is a co-incidence. While this extra profit is real, I believe it is due to the ups and downs of markets and/or settlements of insurance contracts. These kinds of gains are not sustainable year to year. So the underlying profit for TRA was significantly less than the headline figure quoted. The same can be said for the money made on the 'revaluation gains on investments', 'revaluation gain on investment property' and the 'gain on sale of property plant and equipment'. In my judgement the actual comparable net profit gain, the figure that should be used when comparing results from year to year should be adjusted from the headline figure as follows:

    Operating Net Profit = $23.192m - 0.72x$2.664m - ($0.590m+$0.820m+$1.000m) = $19.085m which is 18% lower than the headline figure.

    With 84.802m shares on issue at balance date this equates to 'earnings per share' of 22.5cps

    At today's trading price of $2.94, this puts TRA on an historical PE of 13.0

    That looks 'about right' and shows that at under $3, TRA may not be quite the bargain that some think. Maybe Mr Market knows what he is doing after all?

    The other element that must be factored into the 'profit growth' is the ever increasing number of shares on issue. I have added this information into the table below via an 'earnings per share' calculation..

    FY2014 FY2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018
    NPAT (Turners Limited) (A) $3.823m $8.595m $15.332m $16.789m $19.085m
    Shareholder Equity (Turners Auctions :TUA) $13.378mm
    Shareholder Equity (Dorchester Pacific: DPC) $74.052m
    Shareholder Equity (Turners Limited: TNR) $121.002m $129.812m $171.716m $214.323m
    Total Combined Shareholder Equity (B) $92.430m $121.002m $129.812m $171.716m $214.323m
    Shares on Issue EOFY {C} NM 63.077m 63.431m 74.524m 84.802m
    eps {A}/{C} NM 13.6c 24.2c 21.8c 22.5c
    Return On Equity (A)/(B) 4.1% 7.1% 11.8% 9.8% 8.9%

    Note: I have also now normalized the tax treatment of the FY2015 result, as this gives a better basis for comparison.

    It is interesting to see that while share price has gone nowhere over the last two years neither has Operating NPAT. And that correlation might not be a co-incidence!

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 01-10-2018 at 02:15 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  10. #2750
    ShareTrader Legend Beagle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Auckland
    Posts
    21,362

    Default

    Good you've got the time to get your snout deep in the accounts mate. I don't know how you get the time for all this but I for one am glad you do and I am also glad I have a very modest stake in these. Looks like as I suspected all along Colonial Motors is better value.
    Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.
    Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •