sharetrader
Page 340 of 840 FirstFirst ... 240290330336337338339340341342343344350390440 ... LastLast
Results 3,391 to 3,400 of 8393
  1. #3391
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Here’s a nice piece of poetry about the moon ....a bit lonely is the moon
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  2. #3392
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,732

    Default

    lol

  3. #3393
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Snoops ....do you ever consider “equity risk premium”?


    PWC in a recent report (to be updated) had Turners WACC at 9.4%, one analyst had it at 10.1% and Turners appear to use a higher number than those internally.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  4. #3394
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    397

    Default

    Winner that is how my DCF model works (haven't done one for TRA as I don't know how to value finance and insurance parts of business).

    The more debt the higher the cost of equity. Although I feel like that for finance companies the debt probably needs to be netted out against whatever secures it with some judgement about the risk to the value of whatever secures it.

  5. #3395
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Share price on a roll ..positive momentum building

    I feel a guidance upgrade coming next week

    Very solid result + profit upgrade = 25% quick win for winner
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  6. #3396
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Share price on a roll ..positive momentum building

    I feel a guidance upgrade coming next week

    Very solid result + profit upgrade = 25% quick win for winner
    At $2.65 it has just clawed itself of a 2 year low of $2.57. Nothing to get excited about.

  7. #3397
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Snoops ....do you ever consider “equity risk premium”?

    PWC in a recent report (to be updated) had Turners WACC at 9.4%, one analyst had it at 10.1% and Turners appear to use a higher number than those internally.
    I would be interested in finding out where you saw that "Turners appear to use a higher (WACC) number (9.4% and 10.1%) than those internally."

    In the meantime here is what your favourite website Investopedia says on the topic.

    ------

    Equity Component of WACC Formula

    It is a common misconception that equity capital has no concrete cost that the company must pay after it has listed its shares on the exchange. In reality, there is a cost of equity.

    Since shareholders remain invested in expectations of certain returns on their investments in a company, the shareholders' expected rate of return is a cost from the company's perspective. It is because if the company fails to deliver this expected return, shareholders will simply sell off their shares which will lead to a decrease in share price and in the company’s overall valuation. The cost of equity is essentially the amount that a company must spend in order to maintain a share price that will keep its investors satisfied and invested.

    ------

    What the above explanation doesn't say is that unless the company concerned needs to raise capital by issuing new shares, the quoted share price has no effect on the day to day running of the company at all. This is the situation with Turners Automotive Group today.

    To answer the question "What do Turners need to Spend?" (to support the share price) the answer is "All the big spending is already done." They have the retail sales footprint already. They have the ability to finance their retail sales already. They have the insurance add business to clip that ticket. And they have the debt collection agency to pick up any accounts seriously in arrears. There is work to do to optimise the integration of all the above.

    At the corporate level, TRA can decrease their interest costs by securitising their loans. They can pocket a development margin on any new property they develop. Both are works in progress.

    The question I ask then is this. If all of this spending is done and only incremental spending is to come, what is the 'hidden spending needed' to justify a WACC of 9.4% to 10.1% going forwards? Furthermore if there are no plans to raise more capital why does the value of the WACC matter at all?

    SNOOPY
    Last edited by Snoopy; 23-11-2018 at 02:04 PM.
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  8. #3398
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Snoops ....I thought I told you investopedia was bad for your health
    Last edited by winner69; 23-11-2018 at 01:51 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  9. #3399
    On the doghouse
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    , , New Zealand.
    Posts
    9,285

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    Snoops ....I thought I told you investopedia was bad for your health
    What bit of their treatise on the Cost of Equity do you disagree with?

    SNOOPY
    Watch out for the most persistent and dangerous version of Covid-19: B.S.24/7

  10. #3400
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,853

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Snoopy View Post
    What bit of their treatise on the Cost of Equity do you disagree with?

    SNOOPY
    Ok ...I’ve read it a bit more carefully ...but even though they say that equity has a cost I think they confuse the issue with that bit about the amount needed to be spent to maintain the share price so that shareholders are happy.

    Maybe that last bit confused you as well. I don’t know but your added comments although sort of make sense they don’t address the ‘cost of equity’ per se.

    To me that cost of equity is the risk adjusted return that a shareholder needs (to remain happy as investopedia says). Let’s say in Turners case thats 10% (for ease of calculating) then Turners essentially have a ‘cost’ of $21.4m.

    To save others getting bored I’ll PM you how I see Turners ROIC
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •