sharetrader
Page 160 of 281 FirstFirst ... 60110150156157158159160161162163164170210260 ... LastLast
Results 1,591 to 1,600 of 2808
  1. #1591
    SRV is a God STRAT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Auckland, , New Zealand.
    Posts
    4,327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Great Gold Guru View Post
    PS. I had a look thru a couple of properties in Papatoetoe today. At 100% borrowing I need to buy at a 20% discount to CV to make them cashflow positive ( assuming 50wks per year occupancy ). The agent said that's not out of the question if you get the "right" vendor. Am looking in Avondale tomorrow. Can see the first offer going in on something before the end of the month ....
    Hi GGG,
    Just out of interest what made you choose those two areas?

  2. #1592
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    170

    Default

    Avondale is quite popular with buyers who have been priced out of Westmere,Waterview sort of area. Good schools , 10mins to CBD off-peak , train service , lots of good solid 40's and 50's houses which are the one's I like to buy , similar to quite a bit of the housing stock in Papatoetoe. My basic rule for purchasing over the next 12 months or so will be ....

    Possible rent per week must equal 1.5 x house price / 1000.

    So for instance if purchase for $280,000 then must be able to rent for $420/wk
    ( 280,000 / 1000 = 280 x 1.5 = 420 )

    $280,000 mortgage at 6% = $16,800
    Rates = $1600
    Insurance = $400
    R & M = $1200

    Total annual expenditure = $20,000

    Rent at $420/wk = $21,840

    Positive cashflow of $35pw at 100% gearing. ( $30-$50pw is my target )

    In both Papatoetoe and Avondale I beleive this equation to be possible , strong rental demand in both areas , good solid housing stock , plenty of choice , find the right vendor and keep making offers til one is accepted. Getting the finance will be the hard part but I have 8 other properties with an LVR at 65% over the portfolio so pretty sure if I buy at 10-20% under RV I will get most deals accross the line.

    Buying well and keeping good tenants is the key. I think that is not beyond most people.

  3. #1593
    Legend
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sth Island. New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,436

    Default

    [QUOTE=The Great Gold Guru;249384]

    $280,000 mortgage at 6% = $16,800
    Rates = $1600
    Insurance = $400
    R & M = $1200

    Total annual expenditure = $20,000

    Rent at $420/wk = $21,840

    QUOTE]


    Good luck GGG. Hope it works out well for you. I made my living for many years as a residential landlord. Can't say I'd bother these days as I see so many better, certainly easier, opportunities, and I don't like the look of the residential market. But I would say you should look very hard at your R and M. It's nowhere near enough. You might get by on it with a bit of luck (make that a lot of luck), but your properties will not be up to scratch after a short couple of years, and that's when the riff-raff tenants appear. And be careful budgeting on getting 52 weeks rent for the year. Even without vacancies you can lose out - tenants skipping, that sort of thing. Most often not worth chasing.

  4. #1594
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    New Zealand.
    Posts
    223

    Default

    FP
    You're absolutely right.

    À good friend has been selling down his portfolio of 25 props
    over the last 2 years-only 3 to go! He has actually redefined
    'residential landlord' as 'glorified cleaners'

  5. #1595
    Member Yossarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Great Gold Guru View Post
    Avondale is quite popular with buyers who have been priced out of Westmere,Waterview sort of area. Good schools , 10mins to CBD off-peak , train service , lots of good solid 40's and 50's houses which are the one's I like to buy , similar to quite a bit of the housing stock in Papatoetoe. My basic rule for purchasing over the next 12 months or so will be ....

    Possible rent per week must equal 1.5 x house price / 1000.

    So for instance if purchase for $280,000 then must be able to rent for $420/wk
    ( 280,000 / 1000 = 280 x 1.5 = 420 )

    $280,000 mortgage at 6% = $16,800
    Rates = $1600
    Insurance = $400
    R & M = $1200

    Total annual expenditure = $20,000

    Rent at $420/wk = $21,840

    Positive cashflow of $35pw at 100% gearing. ( $30-$50pw is my target )

    In both Papatoetoe and Avondale I beleive this equation to be possible , strong rental demand in both areas , good solid housing stock , plenty of choice , find the right vendor and keep making offers til one is accepted. Getting the finance will be the hard part but I have 8 other properties with an LVR at 65% over the portfolio so pretty sure if I buy at 10-20% under RV I will get most deals accross the line.

    Buying well and keeping good tenants is the key. I think that is not beyond most people.

    Is that 2 or 3 bedrooms? Regardless, the rent seems expensive for such a cheap property. Or maybe I'm just on a good deal. I would pay less well under "1 times" rent on your calcs.

    PS not that I'm saying you're wrong - just seems like a crap suburb to be a renter!

  6. #1596
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    170

    Default

    I agree, there are some suburbs where renting looks outrageously cheap ... obvious places are like St Heliers or Mission Bay where you can rent a house worth a couple of million for less than $1000pw ... meanwhile down the road in Papatoetoe you can rent a property out for 40% of that that is worth not much more than 10% of the house value.

    Horses for courses ... you'd never buy a rental in Mission Bay , if you could ( and that's the key ) you would buy in Papatoetoe rather than rent ... but alot of people just can't or don't want to buy. Opportunity !!

  7. #1597
    Member Yossarian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    178

    Default

    interesting that there is such a discrepancy. i guess as a general rule the 'nicer' suburbs are going to be 'cheaper' (compared to price to buy) on the whole.

  8. #1598
    Guru Dr_Who's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,045

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Great Gold Guru View Post
    I agree, there are some suburbs where renting looks outrageously cheap ... obvious places are like St Heliers or Mission Bay where you can rent a house worth a couple of million for less than $1000pw ... meanwhile down the road in Papatoetoe you can rent a property out for 40% of that that is worth not much more than 10% of the house value.

    Horses for courses ... you'd never buy a rental in Mission Bay , if you could ( and that's the key ) you would buy in Papatoetoe rather than rent ... but alot of people just can't or don't want to buy. Opportunity !!
    I have a couple of rentals in the Bays area (recently purchased), also have a couple out south. Found that it is much easier to get good tenants in the good areas, while it takes longer to find an ideal tenant out south.
    Having got ourselves into a debt-induced economic crisis, the only permanent way out is to reduce the debt – either directly by abolishing large slabs of it, or indirectly by inflating it away.

  9. #1599
    Senior Member upside_umop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    London, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,187

    Default

    it seems the governor has a similar view on interest rates with the damage it would cause households...

    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?p...Ajo&refer=home
    By the way - it's upside_down, not upside_umop

  10. #1600
    Legend minimoke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,502

    Default

    Oh dear Shrewdy. Median sales have moved up this month to $335,000 - $5,000 more than your price point. And up 2nd month in a row and 3% this year. We know that interest rates are way lower and banks lending criteria much harder. There are more buyers back in the market and days on market have dropped from 62 to 44. Demand is coming back to the market and we know what that means! Haven’t heard from Bernard Hickey (30% drop man) or Gareth Morgan (40% drop man) today. I wonder why?

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •