and hlg perception by the public could translate in time to $ loss too
Possible, but I don't think the public are tracking every single company and what they do. It seems to require media attention to focus this.
Although locally I notice specific industries can face ire. I personally kept track of which local accountants and lawyers claimed the subsidy. Found it to be generally a good indicator of the sort of people I'd want to work with
Proving conclusively that bull ... and W69 are full of shxt.
W69 - has Trevor Mallard paid back the $300k yet?
yes your correct in your 6 mth comparison but the comparison is in the time frame from when subsidies were starting to be paid back. if the comparison holds true bgp and whs will continue to out perform hlg in the future you can call it the bull theorum lol
yes your correct in your 6 mth comparison but the comparison is in the time frame from when subsidies were starting to be paid back. if the comparison holds true bgp and whs will continue to out perform hlg in the future you can call it the bull theorum lol
And since the market sell-off since 23 March :
BGP is up 118%
WHS is up 126%
and
HLG is up 322%
So you can keep your bull theorem to yourself (& W69 who has yet to answer about Trevor Mallard's $300k pay back).
So you can keep your bull theorem to yourself (& W69 who has yet to answer about Trevor Mallard's $300k pay back).
we talking about the future not the past , smart investors sold hlg for not paying the subsidy back and brought into the far superior companies who understand branding and have and probably will be rewarded according to the bull theorum
and hallensteins is up 6.5% so as you say winner it looks like the winners were the stocks that paid the wage subsidy back.
some posters dont get it but proof is in performance of the stocks. end of story
Originally Posted by winner69
Wow bull ....that’s spooky
My response is on WHS thread where you first posted .....HLG shareholders possibly $100m down the gurgler
Sorry guys, I'm dizzy from going around and around in circles so have lost count. Is this the tenth or eleventh time you guys have brought this spurious argument up ?
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
we talking about the future not the past , smart investors sold hlg for not paying the subsidy back and brought into the far superior companies who understand branding and have and probably will be rewarded according to the bull theorum
W69 and you have been so wrong about HLG, you can keep your bullshxt.
we talking about the future not the past , smart investors sold hlg for not paying the subsidy back and brought into the far superior companies who understand branding and have and probably will be rewarded according to the bull theorum
You're bull theorem has even less credibility than the Couta1 theorem
Ecclesiastes 11:2: “Divide your portion to seven, or even to eight, for you do not know what misfortune may occur on the earth.”
Ben Graham - In the short run the market is a voting machine but in the long run the market is a weighing machine
Bookmarks