Thanks Ferg. Appreciate the corrections and pointers.
Have updated the dividend figures to reflect the stock exchange summary. I was using the annual report notes to the accounts which omitted the final dividend.
Have made a comment about the zero interest bearing debt. Thanks for the pointer.
My analysis was a bit of a rushed job on this company I fear! :-(
You're welcome. It didn't look rushed at all so don't worry about that. Plus I recommend you hang onto your spreadsheets, you don't want to give away your IP to roving [bands/gaggles/herds/gangs] of cheeky Mooses/Meeses.
You're welcome. It didn't look rushed at all so don't worry about that. Plus I recommend you hang onto your spreadsheets, you don't want to give away your IP to roving [bands/gaggles/herds/gangs] of cheeky Mooses/Meeses.
The meese have no shame
This one is probably quasi dyslexic . So after I spend an hour typing in the financials I get to spend another half an hour trying to figure out why nothing adds up right
winner(n), extracting specific PL items and doing some ratio drill downs certainly is a good analysis step.
A company that can expand Profit before tax and depreciation other revaluation rubbish without the ADMIN of the company expanding at the same rate as sales is a Winner(). There arnt many that can do it.
surely only close stores if they are unprofitable?
interesting time series, those will be gross wages right no impact from wage subsidies which I guess would be recorded elsewhere as grant income?
only final thought but new stores - they take about 3 years for a store to fully mature with sales ramping up each year. so if a burst of new stores, could impact the wages/revenue ratio. not sure that is the case here with steady as she goes new store approach
Originally Posted by Fiordland Moose
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks