sharetrader
Page 166 of 217 FirstFirst ... 66116156162163164165166167168169170176216 ... LastLast
Results 1,651 to 1,660 of 2166
  1. #1651
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin View Post
    Why NZR have to pay for it, not taxpayer?
    Because they make zillions of profit ...and should have 'invested' earlier to mitigate events like the current crisis. Shareholders can afford it.

    Anyway they'll pass the cost on which means the end consumers end up paying anyway.
    Last edited by winner69; 19-09-2017 at 03:34 PM.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  2. #1652
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,856

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Justin View Post
    Why NZR have to pay for it, not taxpayer?
    ,..maybe nationalise the whole industry instead
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  3. #1653
    Legend peat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Whanganui, New Zealand.
    Posts
    6,436

    Default

    perhaps a bit too much fancy going on in this thread

    A 2nd pipe isnt economic, perhaps the best solution is to expand the Wiri storage , because there is no problem with supply in the medium term, ships can do it if necessary , its more about the time it takes to reconfigure the delivery schedule and the initial delay in achieving that.

    I must say I'm amazed they can have different liquids in the pipeline and then monitor the 'interface'.
    For clarity, nothing I say is advice....

  4. #1654
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by peat View Post
    perhaps I must say I'm amazed they can have different liquids in the pipeline and then monitor the 'interface'.
    The different fuels used to separated by an interface of water and there is a manifold at each end, when the fuel load changes, the manifold is channeled so the interface liquid is put into a separate tank and then the successive fuel then directed to the appropriate storage tank - A1, Diesel, 91 octane... those are refined at Marsden Point but I lost track a while ago if 95/98 PULP is refined at Marsden Point as for some time it wasn't and mainly imported from refineries either in Australia or SE Asia

  5. #1655
    IMO
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Floating Anchor Shoals
    Posts
    9,732

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joshuatree View Post
    Under nationals drifting fiddling 9 year watch.

    [COLOR=rgb(21.093800%, 37.109400%, 57.031300%)]Minor refinery outage[/COLOR]19
    Outage scenario and expected response under status quo

    1. A minor refinery outage is an incident that disrupts the refinery for three weeks. Supply fromthe refinery will be re-established before supply could be fully re-established via imports.
    2. The following assumptions are made about the response to the incident:



    [IMG]file:///page25image6504[/IMG] ••
    •••

    refinery tankage and the RAP will be available within three days
    a number of oil companies will divert cargoes destined for other countries to NewZealand (two within the three week outage), and government will relax fuelspecifications if appropriate
    oil companies will draw down on normal buffer stock and safety stock in terminalsairline flight schedules will be rationalised
    airlines will bunker fuel into New Zealand.



    [COLOR=rgb(21.093800%, 37.109400%, 57.031300%)]Q14. Are there other factors that can be addressed to enable industry to betterrespond to a major refinery outage?[/COLOR]


    83. It is
    period, and thus that there may be brief stock outs in certain areas for short periods.



    estimated that two percent of normal petrol and diesel demand cannot be met over this


    84. While 24 percent of normal jet demand cannot be met over this period, it is assumed thatairlines would manage this shortfall by rationalising flights and bunkering

  6. #1656
    Speedy Az winner69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2001
    Location
    , , .
    Posts
    37,856

    Default

    That 2012 report was an updated version of a 2005 report ...with much the same conclusions

    What happened after 2005 mate?

    Couldn't have greedy ol companies and shareholders spending too much on infrastructure could we.
    “ At the top of every bubble, everyone is convinced it's not yet a bubble.”

  7. #1657
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    292

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by winner69 View Post
    That 2012 report was an updated version of a 2005 report ...with much the same conclusions

    What happened after 2005 mate?

    Couldn't have greedy ol companies and shareholders spending too much on infrastructure could we.
    The pipeline was constructed in the 80s and it's been operating out of sight, out of mind for 30 odd years. There are many examples of single point failures in infrastructure - South Australia had only one HT electricity interconnect with Victoria which failed completely with the loss of several transmission towers in a storm, this would have been less of an issue but SA had shut down most of the coal powered thermal stations and relied significantly on wind farms that had to be shut down in the storm.

    The Centennial Highway coming out of Wellington is another example where the capital could be cut off... the Cook Strait Power Cable, Southern Cross Cable, Auckland Harbour Bridge are infrastructure with high reliance and limited alternatives. We rely on critical infrastructure everyday - we can build resilience but try to explain to a consumer, ratepayer or taxpayer that they have to pay for it for surety of supply...

  8. #1658
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Wellington
    Posts
    2,453

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rep View Post
    The pipeline was constructed in the 80s and it's been operating out of sight, out of mind for 30 odd years. There are many examples of single point failures in infrastructure - South Australia had only one HT electricity interconnect with Victoria which failed completely with the loss of several transmission towers in a storm, this would have been less of an issue but SA had shut down most of the coal powered thermal stations and relied significantly on wind farms that had to be shut down in the storm.

    The Centennial Highway coming out of Wellington is another example where the capital could be cut off... the Cook Strait Power Cable, Southern Cross Cable, Auckland Harbour Bridge are infrastructure with high reliance and limited alternatives. We rely on critical infrastructure everyday - we can build resilience but try to explain to a consumer, ratepayer or taxpayer that they have to pay for it for surety of supply...
    They have upgraded the Cook Strait cables over the years ..not just one cable ....


    1. Five new power and telecommunication cables were laidin 1991, and a further two telecommunication cableswere laid in 2002. They lie unburied on the seabedacross Cook Strait.

      https://www.transpower.co.nz/sites/d...ion%202013.pdf


  9. #1659
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    258

    Default

    Everyone seems to only be worrying about another pipeline failure. I would think a failure in the refinery itself would be many times more likely.

  10. #1660
    Reincarnated Panthera Snow Leopard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Private Universe
    Posts
    5,860

    Cool If the odds are 1 in 1,000,000 then it happens 9 times out of 10

    Quote Originally Posted by Rep View Post
    ...South Australia had only one HT electricity interconnect with Victoria which failed completely with the loss of several transmission towers in a storm...
    You are definitely treading on my turf here and I can say quite categorically that you are completely wrong with that statement.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rep View Post
    this would have been less of an issue but SA had shut down most of the coal powered thermal stations and relied significantly on wind farms that had to be shut down in the storm...
    The wind farms, disconnected themselves from the grid, as a self protection measure, because of the high number of voltage dips in a short space of time.

    The interconnect was then forced to self protect and disconnect as well.

    Read the report here: https://www.aemo.com.au/-/media/File...ember-2016.pdf

    Best Wishes
    Paper Tiger
    om mani peme hum

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •